Abstract:As an emerging task that integrates perception and reasoning, topology reasoning in autonomous driving scenes has recently garnered widespread attention. However, existing work often emphasizes "perception over reasoning": they typically boost reasoning performance by enhancing the perception of lanes and directly adopt MLP to learn lane topology from lane query. This paradigm overlooks the geometric features intrinsic to the lanes themselves and are prone to being influenced by inherent endpoint shifts in lane detection. To tackle this issue, we propose an interpretable method for lane topology reasoning based on lane geometric distance and lane query similarity, named TopoLogic. This method mitigates the impact of endpoint shifts in geometric space, and introduces explicit similarity calculation in semantic space as a complement. By integrating results from both spaces, our methods provides more comprehensive information for lane topology. Ultimately, our approach significantly outperforms the existing state-of-the-art methods on the mainstream benchmark OpenLane-V2 (23.9 v.s. 10.9 in TOP$_{ll}$ and 44.1 v.s. 39.8 in OLS on subset_A. Additionally, our proposed geometric distance topology reasoning method can be incorporated into well-trained models without re-training, significantly boost the performance of lane topology reasoning. The code is released at https://github.com/Franpin/TopoLogic.
Abstract:Computational spectral imaging is drawing increasing attention owing to the snapshot advantage, and amplitude, phase, and wavelength encoding systems are three types of representative implementations. Fairly comparing and understanding the performance of these systems is essential, but challenging due to the heterogeneity in encoding design. To overcome this limitation, we propose the unified encoding model (UEM) that covers all physical systems using the three encoding types. Specifically, the UEM comprises physical amplitude, physical phase, and physical wavelength encoding models that can be combined with a digital decoding model in a joint encoder-decoder optimization framework to compare the three systems under a unified experimental setup fairly. Furthermore, we extend the UEMs to ideal versions, namely, ideal amplitude, ideal phase, and ideal wavelength encoding models, which are free from physical constraints, to explore the full potential of the three types of computational spectral imaging systems. Finally, we conduct a holistic comparison of the three types of computational spectral imaging systems and provide valuable insights for designing and exploiting these systems in the future.
Abstract:Oriented object detection has been developed rapidly in the past few years, where rotation equivariant is crucial for detectors to predict rotated bounding boxes. It is expected that the prediction can maintain the corresponding rotation when objects rotate, but severe mutational in angular prediction is sometimes observed when objects rotate near the boundary angle, which is well-known boundary discontinuity problem. The problem has been long believed to be caused by the sharp loss increase at the angular boundary during training, and widely used IoU-like loss generally deal with this problem by loss-smoothing. However, we experimentally find that even state-of-the-art IoU-like methods do not actually solve the problem. On further analysis, we find the essential cause of the problem lies at discontinuous angular ground-truth(box), not just discontinuous loss. There always exists an irreparable gap between continuous model ouput and discontinuous angular ground-truth, so angular prediction near the breakpoints becomes highly unstable, which cannot be eliminated just by loss-smoothing in IoU-like methods. To thoroughly solve this problem, we propose a simple and effective Angle Correct Module (ACM) based on polar coordinate decomposition. ACM can be easily plugged into the workflow of oriented object detectors to repair angular prediction. It converts the smooth value of the model output into sawtooth angular value, and then IoU-like loss can fully release their potential. Extensive experiments on multiple datasets show that whether Gaussian-based or SkewIoU methods are improved to the same performance of AP50 and AP75 with the enhancement of ACM.
Abstract:Label distribution learning (LDL) is a new machine learning paradigm for solving label ambiguity. Since it is difficult to directly obtain label distributions, many studies are focusing on how to recover label distributions from logical labels, dubbed label enhancement (LE). Existing LE methods estimate label distributions by simply building a mapping relationship between features and label distributions under the supervision of logical labels. They typically overlook the fact that both features and logical labels are descriptions of the instance from different views. Therefore, we propose a novel method called Contrastive Label Enhancement (ConLE) which integrates features and logical labels into the unified projection space to generate high-level features by contrastive learning strategy. In this approach, features and logical labels belonging to the same sample are pulled closer, while those of different samples are projected farther away from each other in the projection space. Subsequently, we leverage the obtained high-level features to gain label distributions through a welldesigned training strategy that considers the consistency of label attributes. Extensive experiments on LDL benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of our method.
Abstract:Label distribution learning (LDL) is an interpretable and general learning paradigm that has been applied in many real-world applications. In contrast to the simple logical vector in single-label learning (SLL) and multi-label learning (MLL), LDL assigns labels with a description degree to each instance. In practice, two challenges exist in LDL, namely, how to address the dimensional gap problem during the learning process of LDL and how to exactly recover label distributions from existing logical labels, i.e., Label Enhancement (LE). For most existing LDL and LE algorithms, the fact that the dimension of the input matrix is much higher than that of the output one is alway ignored and it typically leads to the dimensional reduction owing to the unidirectional projection. The valuable information hidden in the feature space is lost during the mapping process. To this end, this study considers bidirectional projections function which can be applied in LE and LDL problems simultaneously. More specifically, this novel loss function not only considers the mapping errors generated from the projection of the input space into the output one but also accounts for the reconstruction errors generated from the projection of the output space back to the input one. This loss function aims to potentially reconstruct the input data from the output data. Therefore, it is expected to obtain more accurate results. Finally, experiments on several real-world datasets are carried out to demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method for both LE and LDL.
Abstract:Recently, label distribution learning (LDL) has drawn much attention in machine learning, where LDL model is learned from labeled instances. Different from single-label and multi-label annotations, label distributions describe the instance by multiple labels with different intensities and accommodates to more general conditions. As most existing machine learning datasets merely provide logical labels, label distributions are unavailable in many real-world applications. To handle this problem, we propose two novel label enhancement methods, i.e., Label Enhancement with Sample Correlations (LESC) and generalized Label Enhancement with Sample Correlations (gLESC). More specifically, LESC employs a low-rank representation of samples in the feature space, and gLESC leverages a tensor multi-rank minimization to further investigate sample correlations in both the feature space and label space. Benefit from the sample correlation, the proposed method can boost the performance of LE. Extensive experiments on 14 benchmark datasets demonstrate that LESC and gLESC can achieve state-of-the-art results as compared to previous label enhancement baselines.