Dormant: Defending against Pose-driven Human Image Animation

Pose-driven human image animation has achieved tremendous progress, enabling the generation of vivid and realistic human videos from just one single photo. However, it conversely exacerbates the risk of image misuse, as attackers may use one available image to create videos involving politics, violence and other illegal content. To counter this threat, we propose Dormant, a novel protection approach tailored to defend against pose-driven human image animation techniques. Dormant applies protective perturbation to one human image, preserving the visual similarity to the original but resulting in poor-quality video generation. The protective perturbation is optimized to induce misextraction of appearance features from the image and create incoherence among the generated video frames. Our extensive evaluation across 8 animation methods and 4 datasets demonstrates the superiority of Dormant over 6 baseline protection methods, leading to misaligned identities, visual distortions, noticeable artifacts, and inconsistent frames in the generated videos. Moreover, Dormant shows effectiveness on 6 real-world commercial services, even with fully black-box access.

Making Them Ask and Answer: Jailbreaking Large Language Models in Few Queries via Disguise and Reconstruction

In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated notable success across various tasks, but the trustworthiness of LLMs is still an open problem. One specific threat is the potential to generate toxic or harmful responses. Attackers can craft adversarial prompts that induce harmful responses from LLMs. In this work, we pioneer a theoretical foundation in LLMs security by identifying bias vulnerabilities within the safety fine-tuning and design a black-box jailbreak method named DRA (Disguise and Reconstruction Attack), which conceals harmful instructions through disguise and prompts the model to reconstruct the original harmful instruction within its completion. We evaluate DRA across various open-source and close-source models, showcasing state-of-the-art jailbreak success rates and attack efficiency. Notably, DRA boasts a 90\% attack success rate on LLM chatbots GPT-4.

Evaluating Decision Optimality of Autonomous Driving via Metamorphic Testing

Autonomous Driving System (ADS) testing is crucial in ADS development, with the current primary focus being on safety. However, the evaluation of non-safety-critical performance, particularly the ADS's ability to make optimal decisions and produce optimal paths for autonomous vehicles (AVs), is equally vital to ensure the intelligence and reduce risks of AVs. Currently, there is little work dedicated to assessing ADSs' optimal decision-making performance due to the lack of corresponding oracles and the difficulty in generating scenarios with non-optimal decisions. In this paper, we focus on evaluating the decision-making quality of an ADS and propose the first method for detecting non-optimal decision scenarios (NoDSs), where the ADS does not compute optimal paths for AVs. Firstly, to deal with the oracle problem, we propose a novel metamorphic relation (MR) aimed at exposing violations of optimal decisions. The MR identifies the property that the ADS should retain optimal decisions when the optimal path remains unaffected by non-invasive changes. Subsequently, we develop a new framework, Decictor, designed to generate NoDSs efficiently. Decictor comprises three main components: Non-invasive Mutation, MR Check, and Feedback. The Non-invasive Mutation ensures that the original optimal path in the mutated scenarios is not affected, while the MR Check is responsible for determining whether non-optimal decisions are made. To enhance the effectiveness of identifying NoDSs, we design a feedback metric that combines both spatial and temporal aspects of the AV's movement. We evaluate Decictor on Baidu Apollo, an open-source and production-grade ADS. The experimental results validate the effectiveness of Decictor in detecting non-optimal decisions of ADSs. Our work provides valuable and original insights into evaluating the non-safety-critical performance of ADSs.

DataElixir: Purifying Poisoned Dataset to Mitigate Backdoor Attacks via Diffusion Models

Dataset sanitization is a widely adopted proactive defense against poisoning-based backdoor attacks, aimed at filtering out and removing poisoned samples from training datasets. However, existing methods have shown limited efficacy in countering the ever-evolving trigger functions, and often leading to considerable degradation of benign accuracy. In this paper, we propose DataElixir, a novel sanitization approach tailored to purify poisoned datasets. We leverage diffusion models to eliminate trigger features and restore benign features, thereby turning the poisoned samples into benign ones. Specifically, with multiple iterations of the forward and reverse process, we extract intermediary images and their predicted labels for each sample in the original dataset. Then, we identify anomalous samples in terms of the presence of label transition of the intermediary images, detect the target label by quantifying distribution discrepancy, select their purified images considering pixel and feature distance, and determine their ground-truth labels by training a benign model. Experiments conducted on 9 popular attacks demonstrates that DataElixir effectively mitigates various complex attacks while exerting minimal impact on benign accuracy, surpassing the performance of baseline defense methods.

Good-looking but Lacking Faithfulness: Understanding Local Explanation Methods through Trend-based Testing

While enjoying the great achievements brought by deep learning (DL), people are also worried about the decision made by DL models, since the high degree of non-linearity of DL models makes the decision extremely difficult to understand. Consequently, attacks such as adversarial attacks are easy to carry out, but difficult to detect and explain, which has led to a boom in the research on local explanation methods for explaining model decisions. In this paper, we evaluate the faithfulness of explanation methods and find that traditional tests on faithfulness encounter the random dominance problem, \ie, the random selection performs the best, especially for complex data. To further solve this problem, we propose three trend-based faithfulness tests and empirically demonstrate that the new trend tests can better assess faithfulness than traditional tests on image, natural language and security tasks. We implement the assessment system and evaluate ten popular explanation methods. Benefiting from the trend tests, we successfully assess the explanation methods on complex data for the first time, bringing unprecedented discoveries and inspiring future research. Downstream tasks also greatly benefit from the tests. For example, model debugging equipped with faithful explanation methods performs much better for detecting and correcting accuracy and security problems.

ConFL: Constraint-guided Fuzzing for Machine Learning Framework

As machine learning gains prominence in various sectors of society for automated decision-making, concerns have risen regarding potential vulnerabilities in machine learning (ML) frameworks. Nevertheless, testing these frameworks is a daunting task due to their intricate implementation. Previous research on fuzzing ML frameworks has struggled to effectively extract input constraints and generate valid inputs, leading to extended fuzzing durations for deep execution or revealing the target crash. In this paper, we propose ConFL, a constraint-guided fuzzer for ML frameworks. ConFL automatically extracting constraints from kernel codes without the need for any prior knowledge. Guided by the constraints, ConFL is able to generate valid inputs that can pass the verification and explore deeper paths of kernel codes. In addition, we design a grouping technique to boost the fuzzing efficiency. To demonstrate the effectiveness of ConFL, we evaluated its performance mainly on Tensorflow. We find that ConFL is able to cover more code lines, and generate more valid inputs than state-of-the-art (SOTA) fuzzers. More importantly, ConFL found 84 previously unknown vulnerabilities in different versions of Tensorflow, all of which were assigned with new CVE ids, of which 3 were critical-severity and 13 were high-severity. We also extended ConFL to test PyTorch and Paddle, 7 vulnerabilities are found to date.

SSL-WM: A Black-Box Watermarking Approach for Encoders Pre-trained by Self-supervised Learning

Recent years have witnessed significant success in Self-Supervised Learning (SSL), which facilitates various downstream tasks. However, attackers may steal such SSL models and commercialize them for profit, making it crucial to protect their Intellectual Property (IP). Most existing IP protection solutions are designed for supervised learning models and cannot be used directly since they require that the models' downstream tasks and target labels be known and available during watermark embedding, which is not always possible in the domain of SSL. To address such a problem especially when downstream tasks are diverse and unknown during watermark embedding, we propose a novel black-box watermarking solution, named SSL-WM, for protecting the ownership of SSL models. SSL-WM maps watermarked inputs by the watermarked encoders into an invariant representation space, which causes any downstream classifiers to produce expected behavior, thus allowing the detection of embedded watermarks. We evaluate SSL-WM on numerous tasks, such as Computer Vision (CV) and Natural Language Processing (NLP), using different SSL models, including contrastive-based and generative-based. Experimental results demonstrate that SSL-WM can effectively verify the ownership of stolen SSL models in various downstream tasks. Furthermore, SSL-WM is robust against model fine-tuning and pruning attacks. Lastly, SSL-WM can also evade detection from evaluated watermark detection approaches, demonstrating its promising application in protecting the IP of SSL models.

Learning Program Semantics with Code Representations: An Empirical Study

Program semantics learning is the core and fundamental for various code intelligent tasks e.g., vulnerability detection, clone detection. A considerable amount of existing works propose diverse approaches to learn the program semantics for different tasks and these works have achieved state-of-the-art performance. However, currently, a comprehensive and systematic study on evaluating different program representation techniques across diverse tasks is still missed. From this starting point, in this paper, we conduct an empirical study to evaluate different program representation techniques. Specifically, we categorize current mainstream code representation techniques into four categories i.e., Feature-based, Sequence-based, Tree-based, and Graph-based program representation technique and evaluate its performance on three diverse and popular code intelligent tasks i.e., {Code Classification}, Vulnerability Detection, and Clone Detection on the public released benchmark. We further design three {research questions (RQs)} and conduct a comprehensive analysis to investigate the performance. By the extensive experimental results, we conclude that (1) The graph-based representation is superior to the other selected techniques across these tasks. (2) Compared with the node type information used in tree-based and graph-based representations, the node textual information is more critical to learning the program semantics. (3) Different tasks require the task-specific semantics to achieve their highest performance, however combining various program semantics from different dimensions such as control dependency, data dependency can still produce promising results.

DeepObliviate: A Powerful Charm for Erasing Data Residual Memory in Deep Neural Networks

Machine unlearning has great significance in guaranteeing model security and protecting user privacy. Additionally, many legal provisions clearly stipulate that users have the right to demand model providers to delete their own data from training set, that is, the right to be forgotten. The naive way of unlearning data is to retrain the model without it from scratch, which becomes extremely time and resource consuming at the modern scale of deep neural networks. Other unlearning approaches by refactoring model or training data struggle to gain a balance between overhead and model usability. In this paper, we propose an approach, dubbed as DeepObliviate, to implement machine unlearning efficiently, without modifying the normal training mode. Our approach improves the original training process by storing intermediate models on the hard disk. Given a data point to unlearn, we first quantify its temporal residual memory left in stored models. The influenced models will be retrained and we decide when to terminate the retraining based on the trend of residual memory on-the-fly. Last, we stitch an unlearned model by combining the retrained models and uninfluenced models. We extensively evaluate our approach on five datasets and deep learning models. Compared to the method of retraining from scratch, our approach can achieve 99.0%, 95.0%, 91.9%, 96.7%, 74.1% accuracy rates and 66.7$\times$, 75.0$\times$, 33.3$\times$, 29.4$\times$, 13.7$\times$ speedups on the MNIST, SVHN, CIFAR-10, Purchase, and ImageNet datasets, respectively. Compared to the state-of-the-art unlearning approach, we improve 5.8% accuracy, 32.5$\times$ prediction speedup, and reach a comparable retrain speedup under identical settings on average on these datasets. Additionally, DeepObliviate can also pass the backdoor-based unlearning verification.

Towards Privacy and Security of Deep Learning Systems: A Survey

Deep learning has gained tremendous success and great popularity in the past few years. However, recent research found that it is suffering several inherent weaknesses, which can threaten the security and privacy of the stackholders. Deep learning's wide use further magnifies the caused consequences. To this end, lots of research has been conducted with the purpose of exhaustively identifying intrinsic weaknesses and subsequently proposing feasible mitigation. Yet few is clear about how these weaknesses are incurred and how effective are these attack approaches in assaulting deep learning. In order to unveil the security weaknesses and aid in the development of a robust deep learning system, we are devoted to undertaking a comprehensive investigation on attacks towards deep learning, and extensively evaluating these attacks in multiple views. In particular, we focus on four types of attacks associated with security and privacy of deep learning: model extraction attack, model inversion attack, poisoning attack and adversarial attack. For each type of attack, we construct its essential workflow as well as adversary capabilities and attack goals. Many pivot metrics are devised for evaluating the attack approaches, by which we perform a quantitative and qualitative analysis. From the analysis, we have identified significant and indispensable factors in an attack vector, \eg, how to reduce queries to target models, what distance used for measuring perturbation. We spot light on 17 findings covering these approaches' merits and demerits, success probability, deployment complexity and prospects. Moreover, we discuss other potential security weaknesses and possible mitigation which can inspire relevant researchers in this area.