Beyond Single Character: Evaluating MLLMs for Sentence-Level Oracle Bone Inscription Understanding

Existing AI-assisted oracle bone inscription (OBI) visual recognition and understanding studies mainly focus on character-level, ignoring the long-form textual coherence and contextual dependencies embedded in complete divination charges. Recently, the powerful visual perception capabilities of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have opened new possibilities for OBI information processing. In this work, we introduce S-OBI, a novel benchmark for evaluating MLLMs in Sentence-level OBI understanding. Instead of using noisy and incomplete rubbings as the visual input, S-OBI synthesizes clear and standardized sentence-level OBI instances through glyph substitution and composition. According to 95 original rubbings with translations that have been identified, corrected, and verified by experts, we replace characters in the original rubbings with corresponding clean glyph samples sourced from existing OBI datasets while preserving the overall inscriptional structure and semantic organization. This mitigates the influence of low-level distortions and enables a more focused evaluation of sentence-level OBI understanding. Based on this, we design semantic matching, semantic slot extraction, and contextual reasoning tasks and obtain 695 question-answer pairs. Experiments reveal the inferiority of contemporary MLLMs on sentence-level OBI understanding. In particular, visual perception errors in unmasked regions propagate through the reasoning chain, leading to erroneous predictions for masked characters, which indicates that sentence-level OBI understanding in current models remains strongly dependent on character-level recognition. Overall, S-OBI provides a diagnostic benchmark for evaluating whether MLLMs can move beyond isolated character recognition toward structured inscription-level understanding.

GeoR-Bench: Evaluating Geoscience Visual Reasoning

Geoscience intelligence is expected to understand, reason about, and predict earth system changes to support human decision-making in critical domains such as disaster response, climate adaptation and environmental protection. Although current research has shown promising progress on specific geoscience tasks, such as remote sensing interpretation, geographic question-answering, existing benchmarks remain largely task-specific which failing to capture the open-ended real world geoscience problems. As a result, it remains unclear how far current AI systems are from achieving genuine geoscience intelligence. To address this gap, we present \textbf{GeoR-Bench}, a \underline{Bench}mark for evaluating \underline{Geo}science visual \underline{R}easoning through reasoning informed visual editing tasks. GeoR-Bench contains 440 curated samples spanning 6 geoscience categories and 24 task types, covering earth observation imagery and structured scientific representations such as maps and diagrams. We evaluate outputs along three dimensions, including reasoning, consistency, and quality. Benchmark results of 21 closed- and open-source multimodal models reveal that geoscience reasoning remains a critical bottleneck. The highest-performing model achieves 42.7\% overall strict accuracy, while the best open-source models only get 10.3\%. Notably, the visual consistency and image quality of the outputs frequently surpass their scientific accuracy. Ultimately, these findings indicate that current models generate superficially plausible results but fail to capture underlying earth science processes.

ORBIT: Scalable and Verifiable Data Generation for Search Agents on a Tight Budget

Search agents, which integrate language models (LMs) with web search, are becoming crucial for answering complex user queries. Constructing training datasets for deep research tasks, involving multi-step retrieval and reasoning, remains challenging due to expensive human annotation, or cumbersome prerequisites. In this work, we introduce ORBIT, a training dataset with 20K reasoning-intensive queries with short verifiable answers, generated using a frugal framework without relying on paid API services. The modular framework relies on four stages: seed creation, question-answer pair generation, and two stages of verification: self and external. ORBIT spans 15 domains and each training pair requires 4-5 reasoning steps, with external search verification required from the complete web. We train Qwen3-4B as the base model on ORBIT using GRPO and evaluate it on Wikipedia question answering tasks. Extensive experiment results demonstrate that ORBIT-4B achieves strong performance among sub-4B LLMs as search agents, proving the utility of synthetic datasets. Our framework, code and datasets are open-sourced and available publicly.

A^3: Towards Advertising Aesthetic Assessment

Advertising images significantly impact commercial conversion rates and brand equity, yet current evaluation methods rely on subjective judgments, lacking scalability, standardized criteria, and interpretability. To address these challenges, we present A^3 (Advertising Aesthetic Assessment), a comprehensive framework encompassing four components: a paradigm (A^3-Law), a dataset (A^3-Dataset), a multimodal large language model (A^3-Align), and a benchmark (A^3-Bench). Central to A^3 is a theory-driven paradigm, A^3-Law, comprising three hierarchical stages: (1) Perceptual Attention, evaluating perceptual image signals for their ability to attract attention; (2) Formal Interest, assessing formal composition of image color and spatial layout in evoking interest; and (3) Desire Impact, measuring desire evocation from images and their persuasive impact. Building on A^3-Law, we construct A^3-Dataset with 120K instruction-response pairs from 30K advertising images, each richly annotated with multi-dimensional labels and Chain-of-Thought (CoT) rationales. We further develop A^3-Align, trained under A^3-Law with CoT-guided learning on A^3-Dataset. Extensive experiments on A^3-Bench demonstrate that A^3-Align achieves superior alignment with A^3-Law compared to existing models, and this alignment generalizes well to quality advertisement selection and prescriptive advertisement critique, indicating its potential for broader deployment. Dataset, code, and models can be found at: https://github.com/euleryuan/A3-Align.

UniDial-EvalKit: A Unified Toolkit for Evaluating Multi-Faceted Conversational Abilities

Benchmarking AI systems in multi-turn interactive scenarios is essential for understanding their practical capabilities in real-world applications. However, existing evaluation protocols are highly heterogeneous, differing significantly in dataset formats, model interfaces, and evaluation pipelines, which severely impedes systematic comparison. In this work, we present UniDial-EvalKit (UDE), a unified evaluation toolkit for assessing interactive AI systems. The core contribution of UDE lies in its holistic unification: it standardizes heterogeneous data formats into a universal schema, streamlines complex evaluation pipelines through a modular architecture, and aligns metric calculations under a consistent scoring interface. It also supports efficient large-scale evaluation through parallel generation and scoring, as well as checkpoint-based caching to eliminate redundant computation. Validated across diverse multi-turn benchmarks, UDE not only guarantees high reproducibility through standardized workflows and transparent logging, but also significantly improves evaluation efficiency and extensibility. We make the complete toolkit and evaluation scripts publicly available to foster a standardized benchmarking ecosystem and accelerate future breakthroughs in interactive AI.

InterveneBench: Benchmarking LLMs for Intervention Reasoning and Causal Study Design in Real Social Systems

Causal inference in social science relies on end-to-end, intervention-centered research-design reasoning grounded in real-world policy interventions, but current benchmarks fail to evaluate this capability of large language models (LLMs). We present InterveneBench, a benchmark designed to assess such reasoning in realistic social settings. Each instance in InterveneBench is derived from an empirical social science study and requires models to reason about policy interventions and identification assumptions without access to predefined causal graphs or structural equations. InterveneBench comprises 744 peer-reviewed studies across diverse policy domains. Experimental results show that state-of-the-art LLMs struggle under this setting. To address this limitation, we further propose a multi-agent framework, STRIDES. It achieves significant performance improvements over state-of-the-art reasoning models. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/Sii-yuning/STRIDES.

AgentIR: Reasoning-Aware Retrieval for Deep Research Agents

Deep Research agents are rapidly emerging as primary consumers of modern retrieval systems. Unlike human users who issue and refine queries without documenting their intermediate thought processes, Deep Research agents generate explicit natural language reasoning before each search call, revealing rich intent and contextual information that existing retrievers entirely ignore. To exploit this overlooked signal, we introduce: (1) Reasoning-Aware Retrieval, a retrieval paradigm that jointly embeds the agent's reasoning trace alongside its query; and (2) DR-Synth, a data synthesis method that generates Deep Research retriever training data from standard QA datasets. We demonstrate that both components are independently effective, and their combination yields a trained embedding model, AgentIR-4B, with substantial gains. On the challenging BrowseComp-Plus benchmark, AgentIR-4B achieves 68\% accuracy with the open-weight agent Tongyi-DeepResearch, compared to 50\% with conventional embedding models twice its size, and 37\% with BM25. Code and data are available at: https://texttron.github.io/AgentIR/.

SafeSci: Safety Evaluation of Large Language Models in Science Domains and Beyond

The success of large language models (LLMs) in scientific domains has heightened safety concerns, prompting numerous benchmarks to evaluate their scientific safety. Existing benchmarks often suffer from limited risk coverage and a reliance on subjective evaluation. To address these problems, we introduce SafeSci, a comprehensive framework for safety evaluation and enhancement in scientific contexts. SafeSci comprises SafeSciBench, a multi-disciplinary benchmark with 0.25M samples, and SafeSciTrain, a large-scale dataset containing 1.5M samples for safety enhancement. SafeSciBench distinguishes between safety knowledge and risk to cover extensive scopes and employs objective metrics such as deterministically answerable questions to mitigate evaluation bias. We evaluate 24 advanced LLMs, revealing critical vulnerabilities in current models. We also observe that LLMs exhibit varying degrees of excessive refusal behaviors on safety-related issues. For safety enhancement, we demonstrate that fine-tuning on SafeSciTrain significantly enhances the safety alignment of models. Finally, we argue that knowledge is a double-edged sword, and determining the safety of a scientific question should depend on specific context, rather than universally categorizing it as safe or unsafe. Our work provides both a diagnostic tool and a practical resource for building safer scientific AI systems.

STAR : Bridging Statistical and Agentic Reasoning for Large Model Performance Prediction

As comprehensive large model evaluation becomes prohibitively expensive, predicting model performance from limited observations has become essential. However, existing statistical methods struggle with pattern shifts, data sparsity, and lack of explanation, while pure LLM methods remain unreliable. We propose STAR, a framework that bridges data-driven STatistical expectations with knowledge-driven Agentic Reasoning. STAR leverages specialized retrievers to gather external knowledge and embeds semantic features into Constrained Probabilistic Matrix Factorization (CPMF) to generate statistical expectations with uncertainty. A reasoning module guided by Expectation Violation Theory (EVT) then refines predictions through intra-family analysis, cross-model comparison, and credibility-aware aggregation, producing adjustments with traceable explanations. Extensive experiments show that STAR consistently outperforms all baselines on both score-based and rank-based metrics, delivering a 14.46% gain in total score over the strongest statistical method under extreme sparsity, with only 1--2 observed scores per test model.

GTPred: Benchmarking MLLMs for Interpretable Geo-localization and Time-of-capture Prediction

Geo-localization aims to infer the geographic location where an image was captured using observable visual evidence. Traditional methods achieve impressive results through large-scale training on massive image corpora. With the emergence of multi-modal large language models (MLLMs), recent studies have explored their applications in geo-localization, benefiting from improved accuracy and interpretability. However, existing benchmarks largely ignore the temporal information inherent in images, which can further constrain the location. To bridge this gap, we introduce GTPred, a novel benchmark for geo-temporal prediction. GTPred comprises 370 globally distributed images spanning over 120 years. We evaluate MLLM predictions by jointly considering year and hierarchical location sequence matching, and further assess intermediate reasoning chains using meticulously annotated ground-truth reasoning processes. Experiments on 8 proprietary and 7 open-source MLLMs show that, despite strong visual perception, current models remain limited in world knowledge and geo-temporal reasoning. Results also demonstrate that incorporating temporal information significantly enhances location inference performance.