SAB-LVLM: Significance-Aware Binarization for Large Vision-Language Models

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in multimodal understanding, yet their enormous parameter scale and cross-modal computation incur substantial memory and latency overhead, severely limiting real-world deployment on resource-constrained devices. Binarization offers an attractive solution by drastically reducing storage and computational costs. However, existing binarization methods neglect the varying importance of weights across different layers and modalities. This causes parameters irrelevant to downstream tasks to be unnecessarily retained, whereas modality-critical weights may not be adequately optimized, resulting in significant performance degradation. To address these challenges, we develop a novel \underline{S}ignificance-\underline{A}ware \underline{B}inarization for \underline{L}arge \underline{V}ision-\underline{L}anguage \underline{M}odels (SAB-LVLM). Specifically, after constructing Hessian matrices for textual and visual inputs, we propose a spatial significance map to distinguish full-precision weights activated under a single modality from those activated across modalities. We then devise a modality-guided integration strategy to obtain the significance-aware binarization map, which measures weight significance across layers and modalities. Subsequently, this binarization map is incorporated into the binarization objective as an error reweighting term, and binarization fitting is performed through an alternating significance-weighted update scheme. Extensive experiments illustrate the superiority of our SAB-LVLM over existing binary PTQ methods under an approximately 1-bit compression constraint. Our code is accessible at https://github.com/LyuQi127/SAB_LVLM.

Paying More Attention to Visual Tokens in Self-Evolving Large Multimodal Models

Recently, self-evolving large multimodal models (LMMs) have received attention for improving visual reasoning in a purely unsupervised setting. However, multi-role self-play and self-consistency reward schemes in existing self-evolving LMMs optimize answer agreement without ensuring the decoder attends to visual content, relying instead on statistical language priors to produce self consistent outputs. This leads to a persistent failure mode we term visual under-conditioning, where the decoder relies on language priors rather than the image during generation, manifesting as insufficient attention to visual tokens. As a result, current self-evolving LMMs struggle on vision--language understanding tasks such as image captioning and visual question answering. To address this, we propose VISE (Visual Invariance Self-Evolution), a purely unsupervised self-evolving framework that directly regularizes the model's visual conditioning policy through two complementary invariance-based rewards: a geometric invariance reward that enforces spatial consistency under known transformations, and a semantic invariance reward that penalizes evidence-agnostic generation by requiring the model to recognize the absence of evidence when predicted regions are perturbed. VISE operates within a single model without specialist roles, external reward models, or annotations, and is trained on raw unlabeled images. Experiments on 18 benchmarks demonstrate the efficacy of our approach. Using Qwen3-VL-2B as the base model, VISE achieves gains of $+16.85$ CIDEr on COCO and $+19.66$ CIDEr on TextCaps, reduces object hallucination by $5.0$ Chair-I points, and generalizes across four model families and scales. Our code and models are available at https://mbzuai-oryx.github.io/VISE

Ask, Solve, Generate: Self-Evolving Unified Multimodal Understanding and Generation via Self-Consistency Rewards

Most unified large multimodal models (LMMs) that support both visual understanding and image generation still rely on curated post-training supervision, such as human annotations, preference labels, or external reward models. We ask whether a unified LMM can improve both abilities autonomously using only unlabeled images. We propose a self-evolving training framework with three internal roles: a Proposer that generates visual questions, a Solver that answers and evaluates them, and a Generator that synthesizes images. Training uses only self-derived consistency signals, without human annotations, preference labels, or task-trained external reward/judge models. To stabilize learning, we introduce Solver Token Entropy (STE), a continuous difficulty signal based on token-level prediction uncertainty that remains useful even when sample-level consistency becomes unreliable. For image generation, we design a multi-scale internal evaluation scheme that combines question-answer fidelity scoring with cycle-consistent captioning. This creates a solver-mediated coupling, where better visual understanding enables more reliable generation assessment and stronger internal training signals. The framework preserves the same role decomposition, reward logic, and training schedule across diffusion-based BLIP3o, rectified-flow BAGEL, and autoregressive VARGPT-v1.1 architectures, requiring only each backbone's native prompting and generation interface. Across eight understanding metrics, our method consistently improves over the corresponding base models. On BAGEL, it achieves a $+3.5\%$ absolute gain on MMMU and improves GenEval image generation performance from $82\%$ to $85\%$. Code and models are publicly released.

CORTEX: A Structured Reasoning Benchmark for Trustworthy 3D Chest CT MLLMs

Reasoning in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) has shown strong promise in medical imaging. However, this reasoning is usually free-form text judged only by its final answer, making it hard to interpret and verify, especially in 3D radiology, where a diagnosis should be traceable to evidence in the scan. Existing chest CT question-answering datasets compound this by reducing expert radiology reports to answer-only pairs, dropping the reasoning that links findings to conclusions and omitting the patient history clinicians rely on. As a result, reasoning-capable 3D chest CT MLLMs remain out of reach, as neither the structured supervision needed to train them nor the protocol needed to verify their reasoning yet exists. We introduce CORTEX (Clinically Organized Reasoning and sTructured EXplanation), a structured reasoning benchmark for 3D chest CT. For each question, CORTEX restores the missing reasoning as a four-stage diagnostic trace mirroring a radiologist's workflow: task understanding, visual observation, diagnostic reasoning, and answer synthesis. We generate these traces using frontier large language models with broad medical and general-domain knowledge, then filter and verify them with a stage-level evaluation protocol combining automated rubric scoring with expert radiologist review. Crucially, both the reasoning structure and evaluation rubrics are designed in close collaboration with clinicians. Built on CT-RATE, a large, publicly available chest CT dataset without reasoning annotations, CORTEX comprises 76,177 validated reasoning traces across open-ended VQA, closed-ended VQA, and report generation, providing both the structured supervision and the stage-level evaluation protocol needed to build and evaluate trustworthy reasoning models for 3D chest CT. Our dataset and evaluation code will be made publicly available upon acceptance.

FlexPooling with Simple Auxiliary Classifiers in Deep Networks

In computer vision, the basic pipeline of most convolutional neural networks consists of multiple feature extraction layers, where the input signal is downsampled to a lower resolution in each subsequent layer. This downsampling process is commonly referred to as pooling, which is an essential operation in CNNs. Pooling improves robustness against transformations, reduces the number of trainable parameters, increases the receptive field, and lowers computation time. Since pooling is a lossy process but remains important for extracting high-level information from low-level representations, it is important to preserve the most prominent information from previous activations to improve network discriminability. Standard pooling is usually performed using dense pooling methods, such as max pooling or average pooling, or through strided convolutional kernels. In this paper, we propose a simple yet effective adaptive pooling method, called FlexPooling, which generalizes average pooling by learning a weighted average over activations jointly with the rest of the network. We further show that attaching Simple Auxiliary Classifiers (SAC) to the CNN improves performance and demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed method compared with standard pooling methods. Experiments on multiple popular image classification datasets show that FlexPooling consistently outperforms baseline networks, achieving approximately 1 to 3 percent improvement in accuracy.

TerraBench: Can Agents Reason Over Heterogeneous Earth-System Data?

Climate and environmental decision-making increasingly requires reasoning across heterogeneous inputs, including gridded physical data, satellite imagery, geospatial context, and simulator outputs. Weather and climate foundation models can forecast well, but do not reason interactively in language, while large language models (LLMs) reason in language but cannot operate directly on high-dimensional Earth-system data. As a result, real scientific workflows in Earth-science remain underserved. We introduce TerraBench, a benchmark for grounded Earth-science reasoning, built on TerraAgent, a ReAct-style executable framework that interleaves reasoning, tool calls, and observations to couple LLM planning with scientific tools for environmental retrieval, geospatial processing, simulation, and artifact-backed computation. TerraBench unifies analysis of Earth observation imagery, gridded data, GIS reasoning and simulation in a single executable interface, whereas prior benchmarks isolate these capabilities into narrow individual tasks. It is also the first in this space to pair process-level tool-use metrics with tolerance-aware numeric scoring. The benchmark comprises 403 extensive agentic tasks across three tracks (Fundamentals, Simulator-Grounded, and Document-Grounded Verification) and eight application domains with 24,500 verified execution steps. These results indicate that reliable Earth-science agents must go beyond tool access to coordinate heterogeneous workflows, parameterize tools precisely, and preserve artifact provenance.

Beyond False Stability: High-Noise Drift Gating for Test-Time Adversarial Defenses in Vision-Language Models

Vision-language models (VLMs) such as CLIP show strong zero-shot generalization but remain highly vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Adversarial training improves robustness but is computationally expensive, motivating test-time defenses. Recent approaches exploit how CLIP's visual representations respond to stochastic perturbations: aggregating predictions across noisy views, constructing Gaussian noise-averaged anchors and interpolating features toward them, or applying counter-perturbations. These strategies improve robustness but often degrade clean accuracy, yielding an unfavorable clean-robust trade-off. We revisit stochastic test-time defenses and identify an underexplored noise-regime transition in CLIP's representation space. Prior work explored perturbations mainly in the weak-noise regime, where adversarial examples can appear unusually stable (false stability). Our analysis shows this reverses as perturbation strength grows: beyond the weak-noise regime, adversarial representations become markedly more unstable than clean ones, giving a clearer separation signal. The transition is consistent across uniform and Gaussian noise, photometric and geometric transforms, datasets, and diverse attacks. It largely disappears in adversarially trained models, suggesting it is tied to the fragile local-basin geometry of adversarial representations in non-robust CLIP. We propose a training-free, plug-in drift-gated mechanism that uses high-noise feature drift as a lightweight gating signal to trigger existing test-time defenses only when adversarial-like instability is detected. Across 13 datasets it consistently improves the clean-robust trade-off. On eight fine-grained datasets, mean clean+adversarial accuracy rises from 65.7% to 71.4% for counterattack defenses and 68.4% to 73.2% for noise-anchoring; on ImageNet and four shifted variants, from 56.1% to 66.2% and 62.1% to 67.6%.

Operation-Guided Progressive Human-to-AI Text Transformation Benchmark for Multi-Granularity AI-Text Detection

As AI writing assistants become increasingly integrated into real-world drafting and revision workflows, many documents are no longer purely human-written or AI-generated, but instead result from progressive human-AI co-editing. However, existing AI-text detection benchmarks largely focus on final outputs and provide limited understanding of how AI authorship signals emerge, accumulate, or disappear throughout the revision process. We introduce OpAI-Bench, an operation-guided benchmark for studying progressive human-to-AI text transformation across document, sentence, token, and span granularities. Starting from human-written documents, OpAI-Bench constructs nine sequentially revised versions for each sample under predefined AI coverage levels and five representative AI edit operations, covering four domains while preserving complete authorship provenance at multiple granularities. The benchmark supports comprehensive evaluation with 8 document-level detectors, 7 sentence-level detectors, and 2 fine-grained token/span-level detectors. Experiments reveal that AI-text detectability is governed not only by the proportion of AI-edited content, but also by edit operation, domain, and cumulative revision history. Interestingly, we notice that mixed-authorship intermediate versions are often harder to detect than both fully human and heavily AI-edited endpoints, exposing non-monotonic detection patterns missed by existing benchmarks. OpAI-Bench provides a controlled testbed for analyzing whether, when, and how AI-assisted writing becomes detectable under realistic progressive editing scenarios. Our code and benchmark are available at https://github.com/VILA-Lab/OpAI-Bench.

Crafting Your Evolving Dreams: Concept-Incremental Versatile Customization

Custom diffusion models (CDMs) have garnered significant interest owing to their remarkable capacity for generating personalized concepts. However, the majority of CDMs unrealistically presume that the user's collection of personalized concepts is static and incapable of incremental growth over time. Furthermore, they exhibit significant catastrophic forgetting and concept neglect of previously learned concepts when incrementally learning a sequence of new ones. To resolve the above challenges, we develop a novel Continually Customizable Diffusion Model (CCDM), enabling users to perform concept-incremental versatile customization. Specifically, we design an attribute-decoupled LoRA (AD-LoRA) module and a relevance-guided AD-LoRA aggregation strategy to mitigate catastrophic forgetting. They can preserve concept-specific attributes of each task and leverage beneficial inter-task correlations to enhance the continual learning of new customization tasks. Additionally, to address the challenge of concept neglect, we propose a controllable regional context synthesis strategy that performs multi-concept composition in alignment with user-provided conditions. This strategy enhances the overall consistency in multi-concept synthesis by guaranteeing semantic independence between user-defined regions and their smooth boundary transitions. Experiments show our CCDM exhibits significant improvements over baseline methods.

Investigating Adversarial Robustness of Multi-modal Large Language Models

Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) achieve strong performance on vision-language tasks, but incorporating visual inputs through a vision encoder (e.g., CLIP) substantially expands the attack surface, making these models vulnerable to visual adversarial perturbations. Prior defenses typically preserve compatibility with pretrained MLLMs by enforcing strict alignment to CLIP's original embedding space during adversarial fine-tuning; while practical, this constraint fundamentally limits achievable robustness. We present a systematic investigation of adversarial robustness in MLLMs. We first introduce a diagnostic CLIP-alignment protocol that predicts, prior to full MLLM training, which robust vision encoders will transfer effectively to the multimodal setting, revealing that large-scale multimodal adversarial pretraining, rather than unimodal scale alone, is the critical factor for strong robustness transfer. Integrating such encoders into MLLMs via end-to-end multimodal training yields average gains of 28 CIDEr points on captioning and 11.7% VQA accuracy under strong adversarial attacks compared to constrained plug-and-play baselines. We further show that adversarial training applied directly to a standard non-robust MLLM degrades both clean and adversarial performance, establishing robust visual representations as a strict prerequisite, while end-to-end adversarial training from a robust backbone delivers additional gains of 1.9 CIDEr points and 4.3% VQA accuracy. Beyond training-time defenses, lightweight test-time visual stochastic transformations serve as an effective black-box defense for non-robust MLLMs, elevating adversarial performance from near-zero to levels comparable with robust models. Finally, we show that our robust models substantially reduce toxic generation under white-box visual jailbreak attacks. Code and pretrained weights will be released publicly.