A Two-Stage Imaging Framework Combining CNN and Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Full-Inverse Tomography: A Case Study in Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT)

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are a machine learning technique for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) by incorporating PDEs as loss terms in neural networks and minimizing the loss function during training. Tomographic imaging, a method to reconstruct internal properties from external measurement data, is highly complex and ill-posed, making it an inverse problem. Recently, PINNs have shown significant potential in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and have advantages in solving inverse problems. However, existing research has primarily focused on semi-inverse Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT), where internal electric potentials are accessible. The practical full inverse EIT problem, where only boundary voltage measurements are available, remains challenging. To address this, we propose a two-stage hybrid learning framework combining Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and PINNs to solve the full inverse EIT problem. This framework integrates data-driven and model-driven approaches, combines supervised and unsupervised learning, and decouples the forward and inverse problems within the PINN framework in EIT. Stage I: a U-Net constructs an end-to-end mapping from boundary voltage measurements to the internal potential distribution using supervised learning. Stage II: a Multilayer Perceptron (MLP)-based PINN takes the predicted internal potentials as input to solve for the conductivity distribution through unsupervised learning.

Diffusion Models as Optimizers for Efficient Planning in Offline RL

Diffusion models have shown strong competitiveness in offline reinforcement learning tasks by formulating decision-making as sequential generation. However, the practicality of these methods is limited due to the lengthy inference processes they require. In this paper, we address this problem by decomposing the sampling process of diffusion models into two decoupled subprocesses: 1) generating a feasible trajectory, which is a time-consuming process, and 2) optimizing the trajectory. With this decomposition approach, we are able to partially separate efficiency and quality factors, enabling us to simultaneously gain efficiency advantages and ensure quality assurance. We propose the Trajectory Diffuser, which utilizes a faster autoregressive model to handle the generation of feasible trajectories while retaining the trajectory optimization process of diffusion models. This allows us to achieve more efficient planning without sacrificing capability. To evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the Trajectory Diffuser, we conduct experiments on the D4RL benchmarks. The results demonstrate that our method achieves $\it 3$-$\it 10 \times$ faster inference speed compared to previous sequence modeling methods, while also outperforming them in terms of overall performance. https://github.com/RenMing-Huang/TrajectoryDiffuser Keywords: Reinforcement Learning and Efficient Planning and Diffusion Model

SoK: Comparing Different Membership Inference Attacks with a Comprehensive Benchmark

Membership inference (MI) attacks threaten user privacy through determining if a given data example has been used to train a target model. However, it has been increasingly recognized that the "comparing different MI attacks" methodology used in the existing works has serious limitations. Due to these limitations, we found (through the experiments in this work) that some comparison results reported in the literature are quite misleading. In this paper, we seek to develop a comprehensive benchmark for comparing different MI attacks, called MIBench, which consists not only the evaluation metrics, but also the evaluation scenarios. And we design the evaluation scenarios from four perspectives: the distance distribution of data samples in the target dataset, the distance between data samples of the target dataset, the differential distance between two datasets (i.e., the target dataset and a generated dataset with only nonmembers), and the ratio of the samples that are made no inferences by an MI attack. The evaluation metrics consist of ten typical evaluation metrics. We have identified three principles for the proposed "comparing different MI attacks" methodology, and we have designed and implemented the MIBench benchmark with 84 evaluation scenarios for each dataset. In total, we have used our benchmark to fairly and systematically compare 15 state-of-the-art MI attack algorithms across 588 evaluation scenarios, and these evaluation scenarios cover 7 widely used datasets and 7 representative types of models. All codes and evaluations of MIBench are publicly available at https://github.com/MIBench/MIBench.github.io/blob/main/README.md.