Picture for Ranganath Krishnan

Ranganath Krishnan

Intel Labs, Oregon

Learning Conformal Abstention Policies for Adaptive Risk Management in Large Language and Vision-Language Models

Add code
Feb 08, 2025
Viaarxiv icon

SPARC: Subspace-Aware Prompt Adaptation for Robust Continual Learning in LLMs

Add code
Feb 05, 2025
Viaarxiv icon

Enhancing Trust in Large Language Models with Uncertainty-Aware Fine-Tuning

Add code
Dec 03, 2024
Figure 1 for Enhancing Trust in Large Language Models with Uncertainty-Aware Fine-Tuning
Figure 2 for Enhancing Trust in Large Language Models with Uncertainty-Aware Fine-Tuning
Figure 3 for Enhancing Trust in Large Language Models with Uncertainty-Aware Fine-Tuning
Figure 4 for Enhancing Trust in Large Language Models with Uncertainty-Aware Fine-Tuning
Viaarxiv icon

Parameter-Efficient Active Learning for Foundational models

Add code
Jun 14, 2024
Viaarxiv icon

HEAL: Brain-inspired Hyperdimensional Efficient Active Learning

Add code
Feb 17, 2024
Figure 1 for HEAL: Brain-inspired Hyperdimensional Efficient Active Learning
Figure 2 for HEAL: Brain-inspired Hyperdimensional Efficient Active Learning
Figure 3 for HEAL: Brain-inspired Hyperdimensional Efficient Active Learning
Figure 4 for HEAL: Brain-inspired Hyperdimensional Efficient Active Learning
Viaarxiv icon

Reliable Multimodal Trajectory Prediction via Error Aligned Uncertainty Optimization

Add code
Dec 09, 2022
Figure 1 for Reliable Multimodal Trajectory Prediction via Error Aligned Uncertainty Optimization
Figure 2 for Reliable Multimodal Trajectory Prediction via Error Aligned Uncertainty Optimization
Figure 3 for Reliable Multimodal Trajectory Prediction via Error Aligned Uncertainty Optimization
Figure 4 for Reliable Multimodal Trajectory Prediction via Error Aligned Uncertainty Optimization
Viaarxiv icon

Improving Robustness and Efficiency in Active Learning with Contrastive Loss

Add code
Sep 13, 2021
Figure 1 for Improving Robustness and Efficiency in Active Learning with Contrastive Loss
Figure 2 for Improving Robustness and Efficiency in Active Learning with Contrastive Loss
Figure 3 for Improving Robustness and Efficiency in Active Learning with Contrastive Loss
Figure 4 for Improving Robustness and Efficiency in Active Learning with Contrastive Loss
Viaarxiv icon

Mitigating Sampling Bias and Improving Robustness in Active Learning

Add code
Sep 13, 2021
Figure 1 for Mitigating Sampling Bias and Improving Robustness in Active Learning
Figure 2 for Mitigating Sampling Bias and Improving Robustness in Active Learning
Figure 3 for Mitigating Sampling Bias and Improving Robustness in Active Learning
Figure 4 for Mitigating Sampling Bias and Improving Robustness in Active Learning
Viaarxiv icon

Improving model calibration with accuracy versus uncertainty optimization

Add code
Dec 14, 2020
Figure 1 for Improving model calibration with accuracy versus uncertainty optimization
Figure 2 for Improving model calibration with accuracy versus uncertainty optimization
Figure 3 for Improving model calibration with accuracy versus uncertainty optimization
Figure 4 for Improving model calibration with accuracy versus uncertainty optimization
Viaarxiv icon

Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty

Add code
Nov 15, 2020
Figure 1 for Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty
Figure 2 for Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty
Figure 3 for Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty
Figure 4 for Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty
Viaarxiv icon