Model-diff: A Tool for Comparative Study of Language Models in the Input Space

Comparing two (large) language models (LMs) side-by-side and pinpointing their prediction similarities and differences on the same set of inputs are crucial in many real-world scenarios, e.g., one can test if a licensed model was potentially plagiarized by another. Traditional analysis compares the LMs' outputs on some benchmark datasets, which only cover a limited number of inputs of designed perspectives for the intended applications. The benchmark datasets cannot prepare data to cover the test cases from unforeseen perspectives which can help us understand differences between models unbiasedly. In this paper, we propose a new model comparative analysis setting that considers a large input space where brute-force enumeration would be infeasible. The input space can be simply defined as all token sequences that a LM would produce low perplexity on -- we follow this definition in the paper as it would produce the most human-understandable inputs. We propose a novel framework \our that uses text generation by sampling and deweights the histogram of sampling statistics to estimate prediction differences between two LMs in this input space efficiently and unbiasedly. Our method achieves this by drawing and counting the inputs at each prediction difference value in negative log-likelihood. Experiments reveal for the first time the quantitative prediction differences between LMs in a large input space, potentially facilitating the model analysis for applications such as model plagiarism.

OMNIINPUT: A Model-centric Evaluation Framework through Output Distribution

We propose a novel model-centric evaluation framework, OmniInput, to evaluate the quality of an AI/ML model's predictions on all possible inputs (including human-unrecognizable ones), which is crucial for AI safety and reliability. Unlike traditional data-centric evaluation based on pre-defined test sets, the test set in OmniInput is self-constructed by the model itself and the model quality is evaluated by investigating its output distribution. We employ an efficient sampler to obtain representative inputs and the output distribution of the trained model, which, after selective annotation, can be used to estimate the model's precision and recall at different output values and a comprehensive precision-recall curve. Our experiments demonstrate that OmniInput enables a more fine-grained comparison between models, especially when their performance is almost the same on pre-defined datasets, leading to new findings and insights for how to train more robust, generalizable models.

A greedy constructive algorithm for the optimization of neural network architectures

In this work we propose a new method to optimize the architecture of an artificial neural network. The algorithm proposed, called Greedy Search for Neural Network Architecture, aims to minimize the complexity of the architecture search and the complexity of the final model selected without compromising the predictive performance. The reduction of the computational cost makes this approach appealing for two reasons. Firstly, there is a need from domain scientists to easily interpret predictions returned by a deep learning model and this tends to be cumbersome when neural networks have complex structures. Secondly, the use of neural networks is challenging in situations with compute/memory limitations. Promising numerical results show that our method is competitive against other hyperparameter optimization algorithms for attainable performance and computational cost. We also generalize the definition of adjusted score from linear regression models to neural networks. Numerical experiments are presented to show that the adjusted score can boost the greedy search to favor smaller architectures over larger ones without compromising the predictive performance.