WAT: Improve the Worst-class Robustness in Adversarial Training

Deep Neural Networks (DNN) have been shown to be vulnerable to adversarial examples. Adversarial training (AT) is a popular and effective strategy to defend against adversarial attacks. Recent works (Benz et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2021; Tian et al., 2021) have shown that a robust model well-trained by AT exhibits a remarkable robustness disparity among classes, and propose various methods to obtain consistent robust accuracy across classes. Unfortunately, these methods sacrifice a good deal of the average robust accuracy. Accordingly, this paper proposes a novel framework of worst-class adversarial training and leverages no-regret dynamics to solve this problem. Our goal is to obtain a classifier with great performance on worst-class and sacrifice just a little average robust accuracy at the same time. We then rigorously analyze the theoretical properties of our proposed algorithm, and the generalization error bound in terms of the worst-class robust risk. Furthermore, we propose a measurement to evaluate the proposed method in terms of both the average and worst-class accuracies. Experiments on various datasets and networks show that our proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art approaches.

Planning Automated Driving with Accident Experience Referencing and Common-sense Inferencing

Although a typical autopilot system far surpasses humans in term of sensing accuracy, performance stability and response agility, such a system is still far behind humans in the wisdom of understanding an unfamiliar environment with creativity, adaptivity and resiliency. Current AD brains are basically expert systems featuring logical computations, which resemble the thinking flow of a left brain working at tactical level. A right brain is needed to upgrade the safety of automated driving vehicle onto next generation by making intuitive strategical judgements that can supervise the tactical action planning. In this work, we present the concept of an Automated Driving Strategical Brain (ADSB): a framework of a scene perception and scene safety evaluation system that works at a higher abstraction level, incorporating experience referencing, common-sense inferring and goal-and-value judging capabilities, to provide a contextual perspective for decision making within automated driving planning. The ADSB brain architecture is made up of the Experience Referencing Engine (ERE), the Common-sense Referencing Engine (CIE) and the Goal and Value Keeper (GVK). 1,614,748 cases from FARS/CRSS database of NHTSA in the period 1975 to 2018 are used for the training of ERE model. The kernel of CIE is a trained model, COMET-BART by ATOMIC, which can be used to provide directional advice when tactical-level environmental perception conclusions are ambiguous; it can also use future scenario models to remind tactical-level decision systems to plan ahead of a perceived hazard scene. GVK can take in any additional expert-hand-written rules that are of qualitative nature. Moreover, we believe that with good scalability, the ADSB approach provides a potential solution to the problem of long-tail corner cases encountered in the validation of a rule-based planning algorithm.

SOTIF Entropy: Online SOTIF Risk Quantification and Mitigation for Autonomous Driving

Autonomous driving confronts great challenges in complex traffic scenarios, where the risk of Safety of the Intended Functionality (SOTIF) can be triggered by the dynamic operational environment and system insufficiencies. The SOTIF risk is reflected not only intuitively in the collision risk with objects outside the autonomous vehicles (AVs), but also inherently in the performance limitation risk of the implemented algorithms themselves. How to minimize the SOTIF risk for autonomous driving is currently a critical, difficult, and unresolved issue. Therefore, this paper proposes the "Self-Surveillance and Self-Adaption System" as a systematic approach to online minimize the SOTIF risk, which aims to provide a systematic solution for monitoring, quantification, and mitigation of inherent and external risks. The core of this system is the risk monitoring of the implemented artificial intelligence algorithms within the AV. As a demonstration of the Self-Surveillance and Self-Adaption System, the risk monitoring of the perception algorithm, i.e., YOLOv5 is highlighted. Moreover, the inherent perception algorithm risk and external collision risk are jointly quantified via SOTIF entropy, which is then propagated downstream to the decision-making module and mitigated. Finally, several challenging scenarios are demonstrated, and the Hardware-in-the-Loop experiments are conducted to verify the efficiency and effectiveness of the system. The results demonstrate that the Self-Surveillance and Self-Adaption System enables dependable online monitoring, quantification, and mitigation of SOTIF risk in real-time critical traffic environments.

Eco-Mobility-on-Demand Fleet Control with Ride-Sharing

Shared Mobility-on-Demand using automated vehicles can reduce energy consumption and cost for future mobility. However, its full potential in energy saving has not been fully explored. An algorithm to minimize fleet fuel consumption while satisfying customers travel time constraints is developed in this paper. Numerical simulations with realistic travel demand and route choice are performed, showing that if fuel consumption is not considered, the MOD service can increase fleet fuel consumption due to increased empty vehicle mileage. With fuel consumption as part of the cost function, we can reduce total fuel consumption by 12 percent while maintaining a high level of mobility service.