Multi-Representation Genetic Programming: A Case Study on Tree-based and Linear Representations

Existing genetic programming (GP) methods are typically designed based on a certain representation, such as tree-based or linear representations. These representations show various pros and cons in different domains. However, due to the complicated relationships among representation and fitness landscapes of GP, it is hard to intuitively determine which GP representation is the most suitable for solving a certain problem. Evolving programs (or models) with multiple representations simultaneously can alternatively search on different fitness landscapes since representations are highly related to the search space that essentially defines the fitness landscape. Fully using the latent synergies among different GP individual representations might be helpful for GP to search for better solutions. However, existing GP literature rarely investigates the simultaneous effective use of evolving multiple representations. To fill this gap, this paper proposes a multi-representation GP algorithm based on tree-based and linear representations, which are two commonly used GP representations. In addition, we develop a new cross-representation crossover operator to harness the interplay between tree-based and linear representations. Empirical results show that navigating the learned knowledge between basic tree-based and linear representations successfully improves the effectiveness of GP with solely tree-based or linear representation in solving symbolic regression and dynamic job shop scheduling problems.

Sharpness-Aware Minimization in Genetic Programming

Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) was recently introduced as a regularization procedure for training deep neural networks. It simultaneously minimizes the fitness (or loss) function and the so-called fitness sharpness. The latter serves as a measure of the nonlinear behavior of a solution and does so by finding solutions that lie in neighborhoods having uniformly similar loss values across all fitness cases. In this contribution, we adapt SAM for tree Genetic Programming (TGP) by exploring the semantic neighborhoods of solutions using two simple approaches. By capitalizing upon perturbing input and output of program trees, sharpness can be estimated and used as a second optimization criterion during the evolution. To better understand the impact of this variant of SAM on TGP, we collect numerous indicators of the evolutionary process, including generalization ability, complexity, diversity, and a recently proposed genotype-phenotype mapping to study the amount of redundancy in trees. The experimental results demonstrate that using any of the two proposed SAM adaptations in TGP allows (i) a significant reduction of tree sizes in the population and (ii) a decrease in redundancy of the trees. When assessed on real-world benchmarks, the generalization ability of the elite solutions does not deteriorate.

Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Evolutionary Feature Construction in Regression

In recent years, genetic programming (GP)-based evolutionary feature construction has achieved significant success. However, a primary challenge with evolutionary feature construction is its tendency to overfit the training data, resulting in poor generalization on unseen data. In this research, we draw inspiration from PAC-Bayesian theory and propose using sharpness-aware minimization in function space to discover symbolic features that exhibit robust performance within a smooth loss landscape in the semantic space. By optimizing sharpness in conjunction with cross-validation loss, as well as designing a sharpness reduction layer, the proposed method effectively mitigates the overfitting problem of GP, especially when dealing with a limited number of instances or in the presence of label noise. Experimental results on 58 real-world regression datasets show that our approach outperforms standard GP as well as six state-of-the-art complexity measurement methods for GP in controlling overfitting. Furthermore, the ensemble version of GP with sharpness-aware minimization demonstrates superior performance compared to nine fine-tuned machine learning and symbolic regression algorithms, including XGBoost and LightGBM.

On The Nature Of The Phenotype In Tree Genetic Programming

In this contribution, we discuss the basic concepts of genotypes and phenotypes in tree-based GP (TGP), and then analyze their behavior using five benchmark datasets. We show that TGP exhibits the same behavior that we can observe in other GP representations: At the genotypic level trees show frequently unchecked growth with seemingly ineffective code, but on the phenotypic level, much smaller trees can be observed. To generate phenotypes, we provide a unique technique for removing semantically ineffective code from GP trees. The approach extracts considerably simpler phenotypes while not being limited to local operations in the genotype. We generalize this transformation based on a problem-independent parameter that enables a further simplification of the exact phenotype by coarse-graining to produce approximate phenotypes. The concept of these phenotypes (exact and approximate) allows us to clarify what evolved solutions truly predict, making GP models considered at the phenotypic level much better interpretable.

Discovering Adaptable Symbolic Algorithms from Scratch

Autonomous robots deployed in the real world will need control policies that rapidly adapt to environmental changes. To this end, we propose AutoRobotics-Zero (ARZ), a method based on AutoML-Zero that discovers zero-shot adaptable policies from scratch. In contrast to neural network adaption policies, where only model parameters are optimized, ARZ can build control algorithms with the full expressive power of a linear register machine. We evolve modular policies that tune their model parameters and alter their inference algorithm on-the-fly to adapt to sudden environmental changes. We demonstrate our method on a realistic simulated quadruped robot, for which we evolve safe control policies that avoid falling when individual limbs suddenly break. This is a challenging task in which two popular neural network baselines fail. Finally, we conduct a detailed analysis of our method on a novel and challenging non-stationary control task dubbed Cataclysmic Cartpole. Results confirm our findings that ARZ is significantly more robust to sudden environmental changes and can build simple, interpretable control policies.

Active Learning in Genetic Programming: Guiding Efficient Data Collection for Symbolic Regression

This paper examines various methods of computing uncertainty and diversity for active learning in genetic programming. We found that the model population in genetic programming can be exploited to select informative training data points by using a model ensemble combined with an uncertainty metric. We explored several uncertainty metrics and found that differential entropy performed the best. We also compared two data diversity metrics and found that correlation as a diversity metric performs better than minimum Euclidean distance, although there are some drawbacks that prevent correlation from being used on all problems. Finally, we combined uncertainty and diversity using a Pareto optimization approach to allow both to be considered in a balanced way to guide the selection of informative and unique data points for training.

Phenotype Search Trajectory Networks for Linear Genetic Programming

Genotype-to-phenotype mappings translate genotypic variations such as mutations into phenotypic changes. Neutrality is the observation that some mutations do not lead to phenotypic changes. Studying the search trajectories in genotypic and phenotypic spaces, especially through neutral mutations, helps us to better understand the progression of evolution and its algorithmic behaviour. In this study, we visualise the search trajectories of a genetic programming system as graph-based models, where nodes are genotypes/phenotypes and edges represent their mutational transitions. We also quantitatively measure the characteristics of phenotypes including their genotypic abundance (the requirement for neutrality) and Kolmogorov complexity. We connect these quantified metrics with search trajectory visualisations, and find that more complex phenotypes are under-represented by fewer genotypes and are harder for evolution to discover. Less complex phenotypes, on the other hand, are over-represented by genotypes, are easier to find, and frequently serve as stepping-stones for evolution.

An Artificial Chemistry Implementation of a Gene Regulatory Network

Gene Regulatory Networks are networks of interactions in biological organisms responsible for determining the production levels of proteins and peptides. Proteins are workers of a cell factory, and their production defines the goal of a cell and its development. Various attempts have been made to model such networks both to understand these biological systems better and to use inspiration from understanding them to solve computational problems. In this work, a biologically more realistic model for gene regulatory networks is proposed, which incorporates Cellular Automata and Artificial Chemistry to model the interactions between regulatory proteins called the Transcription Factors and the regulatory sites of genes. The result of this work shows complex dynamics close to what can be observed in nature. Here, an analysis of the impact of the initial states of the system on the produced dynamics is performed, showing that such evolvable models can be directed towards producing desired protein dynamics.

Correlation versus RMSE Loss Functions in Symbolic Regression Tasks

The use of correlation as a fitness function is explored in symbolic regression tasks and the performance is compared against the typical RMSE fitness function. Using correlation with an alignment step to conclude the evolution led to significant performance gains over RMSE as a fitness function. Using correlation as a fitness function led to solutions being found in fewer generations compared to RMSE, as well it was found that fewer data points were needed in the training set to discover the correct equations. The Feynman Symbolic Regression Benchmark as well as several other old and recent GP benchmark problems were used to evaluate performance.

Genetic Improvement in the Shackleton Framework for Optimizing LLVM Pass Sequences

Genetic improvement is a search technique that aims to improve a given acceptable solution to a problem. In this paper, we present the novel use of genetic improvement to find problem-specific optimized LLVM pass sequences. We develop a pass-level patch representation in the linear genetic programming framework, Shackleton, to evolve the modifications to be applied to the default optimization pass sequences. Our GI-evolved solution has a mean of 3.7% runtime improvement compared to the -O3 optimization level in the default code generation options which optimizes on runtime. The proposed GI method provides an automatic way to find a problem-specific optimization sequence that improves upon a general solution without any expert domain knowledge. In this paper, we discuss the advantages and limitations of the GI feature in the Shackleton Framework and present our results.