Enhancing Relation Extraction via Supervised Rationale Verification and Feedback

Despite the rapid progress that existing automated feedback methods have made in correcting the output of large language models (LLMs), these methods cannot be well applied to the relation extraction (RE) task due to their designated feedback objectives and correction manner. To address this problem, we propose a novel automated feedback framework for RE, which presents a rationale supervisor to verify the rationale and provide re-selected demonstrations as feedback to correct the initial prediction. Specifically, we first design a causal intervention and observation method for to collect biased/unbiased rationales for contrastive training the rationale supervisor. Then, we present a verification-feedback-correction procedure to iteratively enhance LLMs' capability of handling the RE task. Extensive experiments prove that our proposed framework significantly outperforms existing methods.

Large Language Models as Counterfactual Generator: Strengths and Weaknesses

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in a range of natural language understanding and generation tasks. Yet, their ability to generate counterfactuals, which can be used for areas like data augmentation, remains under-explored. This study aims to investigate the counterfactual generation capabilities of LLMs and analysis factors that influence this ability. First, we evaluate how effective are LLMs in counterfactual generation through data augmentation experiments for small language models (SLMs) across four tasks: sentiment analysis, natural language inference, named entity recognition, and relation extraction. While LLMs show promising enhancements in various settings, they struggle in complex tasks due to their self-limitations and the lack of logical guidance to produce counterfactuals that align with commonsense. Second, our analysis reveals the pivotal role of providing accurate task definitions and detailed step-by-step instructions to LLMs in generating counterfactuals. Interestingly, we also find that LLMs can generate reasonable counterfactuals even with unreasonable demonstrations, which illustrates that demonstrations are primarily to regulate the output format.This study provides the first comprehensive insight into counterfactual generation abilities of LLMs, and offers a novel perspective on utilizing LLMs for data augmentation to enhance SLMs.

Back to Reality: Leveraging Pattern-driven Modeling to Enable Affordable Sentiment Dependency Learning

Aspect-based Sentiment Classification (ABSC) is a challenging sub-task of traditional sentiment analysis. Due to the difficulty of handling potential correlations among sentiment polarities of multiple aspects, i.e., sentiment dependency, recent popular works tend to exploit syntactic information guiding sentiment dependency parsing. However, syntax information (e.g., syntactic dependency trees) usually occupies expensive computational resources in terms of the operation of the adjacent matrix. Instead, we define the consecutive aspects with the same sentiment as the sentiment cluster in the case that we find that most sentiment dependency occurs between adjacent aspects. Motivated by this finding, we propose the sentiment patterns (SP) to guide the model dependency learning. Thereafter, we introduce the local sentiment aggregating (LSA) mechanism to focus on learning the sentiment dependency in the sentiment cluster. The LSA is more efficient than existing dependency tree-based models due to the absence of additional dependency matrix constructing and modeling. Furthermore, we propose differential weighting for aggregation window building to measure the importance of sentiment dependency. Experiments on four public datasets show that our models achieve state-of-the-art performance with especially improvement on learning sentiment cluster.