Reasoning based on symbolic and parametric knowledge bases: a survey

Reasoning is fundamental to human intelligence, and critical for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning refers to drawing new conclusions based on existing knowledge, which can support various applications like clinical diagnosis, basic education, and financial analysis. Though a good number of surveys have been proposed for reviewing reasoning-related methods, none of them has systematically investigated these methods from the viewpoint of their dependent knowledge base. Both the scenarios to which the knowledge bases are applied and their storage formats are significantly different. Hence, investigating reasoning methods from the knowledge base perspective helps us better understand the challenges and future directions. To fill this gap, this paper first classifies the knowledge base into symbolic and parametric ones. The former explicitly stores information in human-readable symbols, and the latter implicitly encodes knowledge within parameters. Then, we provide a comprehensive overview of reasoning methods using symbolic knowledge bases, parametric knowledge bases, and both of them. Finally, we identify the future direction toward enhancing reasoning capabilities to bridge the gap between human and machine intelligence.

Toxicity Detection towards Adaptability to Changing Perturbations

Toxicity detection is crucial for maintaining the peace of the society. While existing methods perform well on normal toxic contents or those generated by specific perturbation methods, they are vulnerable to evolving perturbation patterns. However, in real-world scenarios, malicious users tend to create new perturbation patterns for fooling the detectors. For example, some users may circumvent the detector of large language models (LLMs) by adding `I am a scientist' at the beginning of the prompt. In this paper, we introduce a novel problem, i.e., continual learning jailbreak perturbation patterns, into the toxicity detection field. To tackle this problem, we first construct a new dataset generated by 9 types of perturbation patterns, 7 of them are summarized from prior work and 2 of them are developed by us. We then systematically validate the vulnerability of current methods on this new perturbation pattern-aware dataset via both the zero-shot and fine tuned cross-pattern detection. Upon this, we present the domain incremental learning paradigm and the corresponding benchmark to ensure the detector's robustness to dynamically emerging types of perturbed toxic text. Our code and dataset are provided in the appendix and will be publicly available at GitHub, by which we wish to offer new research opportunities for the security-relevant communities.

Enhancing Relation Extraction via Supervised Rationale Verification and Feedback

Despite the rapid progress that existing automated feedback methods have made in correcting the output of large language models (LLMs), these methods cannot be well applied to the relation extraction (RE) task due to their designated feedback objectives and correction manner. To address this problem, we propose a novel automated feedback framework for RE, which presents a rationale supervisor to verify the rationale and provide re-selected demonstrations as feedback to correct the initial prediction. Specifically, we first design a causal intervention and observation method for to collect biased/unbiased rationales for contrastive training the rationale supervisor. Then, we present a verification-feedback-correction procedure to iteratively enhance LLMs' capability of handling the RE task. Extensive experiments prove that our proposed framework significantly outperforms existing methods.

Large Language Models as Counterfactual Generator: Strengths and Weaknesses

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in a range of natural language understanding and generation tasks. Yet, their ability to generate counterfactuals, which can be used for areas like data augmentation, remains under-explored. This study aims to investigate the counterfactual generation capabilities of LLMs and analysis factors that influence this ability. First, we evaluate how effective are LLMs in counterfactual generation through data augmentation experiments for small language models (SLMs) across four tasks: sentiment analysis, natural language inference, named entity recognition, and relation extraction. While LLMs show promising enhancements in various settings, they struggle in complex tasks due to their self-limitations and the lack of logical guidance to produce counterfactuals that align with commonsense. Second, our analysis reveals the pivotal role of providing accurate task definitions and detailed step-by-step instructions to LLMs in generating counterfactuals. Interestingly, we also find that LLMs can generate reasonable counterfactuals even with unreasonable demonstrations, which illustrates that demonstrations are primarily to regulate the output format.This study provides the first comprehensive insight into counterfactual generation abilities of LLMs, and offers a novel perspective on utilizing LLMs for data augmentation to enhance SLMs.

Back to Reality: Leveraging Pattern-driven Modeling to Enable Affordable Sentiment Dependency Learning

Aspect-based Sentiment Classification (ABSC) is a challenging sub-task of traditional sentiment analysis. Due to the difficulty of handling potential correlations among sentiment polarities of multiple aspects, i.e., sentiment dependency, recent popular works tend to exploit syntactic information guiding sentiment dependency parsing. However, syntax information (e.g., syntactic dependency trees) usually occupies expensive computational resources in terms of the operation of the adjacent matrix. Instead, we define the consecutive aspects with the same sentiment as the sentiment cluster in the case that we find that most sentiment dependency occurs between adjacent aspects. Motivated by this finding, we propose the sentiment patterns (SP) to guide the model dependency learning. Thereafter, we introduce the local sentiment aggregating (LSA) mechanism to focus on learning the sentiment dependency in the sentiment cluster. The LSA is more efficient than existing dependency tree-based models due to the absence of additional dependency matrix constructing and modeling. Furthermore, we propose differential weighting for aggregation window building to measure the importance of sentiment dependency. Experiments on four public datasets show that our models achieve state-of-the-art performance with especially improvement on learning sentiment cluster.