On Effects of Steering Latent Representation for Large Language Model Unlearning

Representation Misdirection for Unlearning (RMU), which steers model representation in the intermediate layer to a target random representation, is an effective method for large language model (LLM) unlearning. Despite its high performance, the underlying cause and explanation remain underexplored. In this paper, we first theoretically demonstrate that steering forget representations in the intermediate layer reduces token confidence, causing LLMs to generate wrong or nonsense responses. Second, we investigate how the coefficient influences the alignment of forget-sample representations with the random direction and hint at the optimal coefficient values for effective unlearning across different network layers. Third, we show that RMU unlearned models are robust against adversarial jailbreak attacks. Last, our empirical analysis shows that RMU is less effective when applied to the middle and later layers in LLMs. To resolve this drawback, we propose Adaptive RMU -- a simple yet effective alternative method that makes unlearning effective with most layers. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Adaptive RMU significantly improves the unlearning performance compared to prior art while incurring no additional computational cost.

Wicked Oddities: Selectively Poisoning for Effective Clean-Label Backdoor Attacks

Deep neural networks are vulnerable to backdoor attacks, a type of adversarial attack that poisons the training data to manipulate the behavior of models trained on such data. Clean-label attacks are a more stealthy form of backdoor attacks that can perform the attack without changing the labels of poisoned data. Early works on clean-label attacks added triggers to a random subset of the training set, ignoring the fact that samples contribute unequally to the attack's success. This results in high poisoning rates and low attack success rates. To alleviate the problem, several supervised learning-based sample selection strategies have been proposed. However, these methods assume access to the entire labeled training set and require training, which is expensive and may not always be practical. This work studies a new and more practical (but also more challenging) threat model where the attacker only provides data for the target class (e.g., in face recognition systems) and has no knowledge of the victim model or any other classes in the training set. We study different strategies for selectively poisoning a small set of training samples in the target class to boost the attack success rate in this setting. Our threat model poses a serious threat in training machine learning models with third-party datasets, since the attack can be performed effectively with limited information. Experiments on benchmark datasets illustrate the effectiveness of our strategies in improving clean-label backdoor attacks.

A Cosine Similarity-based Method for Out-of-Distribution Detection

The ability to detect OOD data is a crucial aspect of practical machine learning applications. In this work, we show that cosine similarity between the test feature and the typical ID feature is a good indicator of OOD data. We propose Class Typical Matching (CTM), a post hoc OOD detection algorithm that uses a cosine similarity scoring function. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmarks show that CTM outperforms existing post hoc OOD detection methods.

Class based Influence Functions for Error Detection

Influence functions (IFs) are a powerful tool for detecting anomalous examples in large scale datasets. However, they are unstable when applied to deep networks. In this paper, we provide an explanation for the instability of IFs and develop a solution to this problem. We show that IFs are unreliable when the two data points belong to two different classes. Our solution leverages class information to improve the stability of IFs. Extensive experiments show that our modification significantly improves the performance and stability of IFs while incurring no additional computational cost.

Towards Using Data-Centric Approach for Better Code Representation Learning

Despite the recent trend of creating source code models and applying them to software engineering tasks, the quality of such models is insufficient for real-world application. In this work, we focus on improving existing code learning models from the data-centric perspective instead of designing new source code models. We shed some light on this direction by using a so-called data-influence method to identify noisy samples of pre-trained code learning models. The data-influence method is to assess the similarity of a target sample to the correct samples to determine whether or not such the target sample is noisy. The results of our evaluation show that data-influence methods can identify noisy samples for the code classification and defection prediction tasks. We envision that the data-centric approach will be a key driver for developing source code models that are useful in practice.

Toward a Generalization Metric for Deep Generative Models

Measuring the generalization capacity of Deep Generative Models (DGMs) is difficult because of the curse of dimensionality. Evaluation metrics for DGMs like Inception Score, Frechet Inception Distance, Precision-Recall, and Neural Net Divergence try to estimate the distance between the generated distribution and the target distribution using a polynomial number of samples. These metrics are the target of researchers when designing new models. Despite the claims, it is still unclear how well they can measure the generalization capacity of a model. In this paper, we investigate the capacity of these metrics in measuring the generalization capacity. We introduce a framework for comparing the robustness of evaluation metrics. We show that better scores in these metrics do not imply better generalization. They can be fooled easily by a generator that memorizes a small subset of the training set. We propose a fix to the NND metric to make it more robust to noise in the generated data.

Improving Generalization and Stability of Generative Adversarial Networks

Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) are one of the most popular tools for learning complex high dimensional distributions. However, generalization properties of GANs have not been well understood. In this paper, we analyze the generalization of GANs in practical settings. We show that discriminators trained on discrete datasets with the original GAN loss have poor generalization capability and do not approximate the theoretically optimal discriminator. We propose a zero-centered gradient penalty for improving the generalization of the discriminator by pushing it toward the optimal discriminator. The penalty guarantees the generalization and convergence of GANs. Experiments on synthetic and large scale datasets verify our theoretical analysis.

On catastrophic forgetting and mode collapse in Generative Adversarial Networks

Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) are one of the most prominent tools for learning complicated distributions. However, problems such as mode collapse and catastrophic forgetting, prevent GAN from learning the target distribution. These problems are usually studied independently from each other. In this paper, we show that both problems are present in GAN and their combined effect makes the training of GAN unstable. We also show that methods such as gradient penalties and momentum based optimizers can improve the stability of GAN by effectively preventing these problems from happening. Finally, we study a mechanism for mode collapse to occur and propagate in feedforward neural networks.