Benchmarking LLM Guardrails in Handling Multilingual Toxicity

With the ubiquity of Large Language Models (LLMs), guardrails have become crucial to detect and defend against toxic content. However, with the increasing pervasiveness of LLMs in multilingual scenarios, their effectiveness in handling multilingual toxic inputs remains unclear. In this work, we introduce a comprehensive multilingual test suite, spanning seven datasets and over ten languages, to benchmark the performance of state-of-the-art guardrails. We also investigates the resilience of guardrails against recent jailbreaking techniques, and assess the impact of in-context safety policies and language resource availability on guardrails' performance. Our findings show that existing guardrails are still ineffective at handling multilingual toxicity and lack robustness against jailbreaking prompts. This work aims to identify the limitations of guardrails and to build a more reliable and trustworthy LLMs in multilingual scenarios.

Understanding Calibration for Multilingual Question Answering Models

Multilingual pre-trained language models are incredibly effective at Question Answering (QA), a core task in Natural Language Understanding, achieving high accuracies on several multilingual benchmarks. However, little is known about how well they are calibrated. In this paper, we study the calibration properties of several pre-trained multilingual large language models (LLMs) on a variety of question-answering tasks. We perform extensive experiments, spanning both extractive and generative QA model designs and diverse languages, spanning both high-resource and low-resource ones. We study different dimensions of calibration in in-distribution, out-of-distribution, and cross-lingual transfer settings, and investigate strategies to improve it, including post-hoc methods and regularized fine-tuning. We demonstrate automatically translated data augmentation as a highly effective technique to improve model calibration. We also conduct a number of ablation experiments to study the effect of model size on calibration and how multilingual models compare with their monolingual counterparts for diverse tasks and languages.

Using Semantic Information for Defining and Detecting OOD Inputs

As machine learning models continue to achieve impressive performance across different tasks, the importance of effective anomaly detection for such models has increased as well. It is common knowledge that even well-trained models lose their ability to function effectively on out-of-distribution inputs. Thus, out-of-distribution (OOD) detection has received some attention recently. In the vast majority of cases, it uses the distribution estimated by the training dataset for OOD detection. We demonstrate that the current detectors inherit the biases in the training dataset, unfortunately. This is a serious impediment, and can potentially restrict the utility of the trained model. This can render the current OOD detectors impermeable to inputs lying outside the training distribution but with the same semantic information (e.g. training class labels). To remedy this situation, we begin by defining what should ideally be treated as an OOD, by connecting inputs with their semantic information content. We perform OOD detection on semantic information extracted from the training data of MNIST and COCO datasets and show that it not only reduces false alarms but also significantly improves the detection of OOD inputs with spurious features from the training data.

In and Out-of-Domain Text Adversarial Robustness via Label Smoothing

Recently it has been shown that state-of-the-art NLP models are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where the predictions of a model can be drastically altered by slight modifications to the input (such as synonym substitutions). While several defense techniques have been proposed, and adapted, to the discrete nature of text adversarial attacks, the benefits of general-purpose regularization methods such as label smoothing for language models, have not been studied. In this paper, we study the adversarial robustness provided by various label smoothing strategies in foundational models for diverse NLP tasks in both in-domain and out-of-domain settings. Our experiments show that label smoothing significantly improves adversarial robustness in pre-trained models like BERT, against various popular attacks. We also analyze the relationship between prediction confidence and robustness, showing that label smoothing reduces over-confident errors on adversarial examples.

Memory Classifiers: Two-stage Classification for Robustness in Machine Learning

The performance of machine learning models can significantly degrade under distribution shifts of the data. We propose a new method for classification which can improve robustness to distribution shifts, by combining expert knowledge about the ``high-level" structure of the data with standard classifiers. Specifically, we introduce two-stage classifiers called \textit{memory classifiers}. First, these identify prototypical data points -- \textit{memories} -- to cluster the training data. This step is based on features designed with expert guidance; for instance, for image data they can be extracted using digital image processing algorithms. Then, within each cluster, we learn local classifiers based on finer discriminating features, via standard models like deep neural networks. We establish generalization bounds for memory classifiers. We illustrate in experiments that they can improve generalization and robustness to distribution shifts on image datasets. We show improvements which push beyond standard data augmentation techniques.