Evaluating the Robustness of Deep-Learning Algorithm-Selection Models by Evolving Adversarial Instances

Deep neural networks (DNN) are increasingly being used to perform algorithm-selection in combinatorial optimisation domains, particularly as they accommodate input representations which avoid designing and calculating features. Mounting evidence from domains that use images as input shows that deep convolutional networks are vulnerable to adversarial samples, in which a small perturbation of an instance can cause the DNN to misclassify. However, it remains unknown as to whether deep recurrent networks (DRN) which have recently been shown promise as algorithm-selectors in the bin-packing domain are equally vulnerable. We use an evolutionary algorithm (EA) to find perturbations of instances from two existing benchmarks for online bin packing that cause trained DRNs to misclassify: adversarial samples are successfully generated from up to 56% of the original instances depending on the dataset. Analysis of the new misclassified instances sheds light on the `fragility' of some training instances, i.e. instances where it is trivial to find a small perturbation that results in a misclassification and the factors that influence this. Finally, the method generates a large number of new instances misclassified with a wide variation in confidence, providing a rich new source of training data to create more robust models.

Identifying Easy Instances to Improve Efficiency of ML Pipelines for Algorithm-Selection

Algorithm-selection (AS) methods are essential in order to obtain the best performance from a portfolio of solvers over large sets of instances. However, many AS methods rely on an analysis phase, e.g. where features are computed by sampling solutions and used as input in a machine-learning model. For AS to be efficient, it is therefore important that this analysis phase is not computationally expensive. We propose a method for identifying easy instances which can be solved quickly using a generalist solver without any need for algorithm-selection. This saves computational budget associated with feature-computation which can then be used elsewhere in an AS pipeline, e.g., enabling additional function evaluations on hard problems. Experiments on the BBOB dataset in two settings (batch and streaming) show that identifying easy instances results in substantial savings in function evaluations. Re-allocating the saved budget to hard problems provides gains in performance compared to both the virtual best solver (VBS) computed with the original budget, the single best solver (SBS) and a trained algorithm-selector.

Improving Algorithm-Selection and Performance-Prediction via Learning Discriminating Training Samples

The choice of input-data used to train algorithm-selection models is recognised as being a critical part of the model success. Recently, feature-free methods for algorithm-selection that use short trajectories obtained from running a solver as input have shown promise. However, it is unclear to what extent these trajectories reliably discriminate between solvers. We propose a meta approach to generating discriminatory trajectories with respect to a portfolio of solvers. The algorithm-configuration tool irace is used to tune the parameters of a simple Simulated Annealing algorithm (SA) to produce trajectories that maximise the performance metrics of ML models trained on this data. We show that when the trajectories obtained from the tuned SA algorithm are used in ML models for algorithm-selection and performance prediction, we obtain significantly improved performance metrics compared to models trained both on raw trajectory data and on exploratory landscape features.

On the Utility of Probing Trajectories for Algorithm-Selection

Machine-learning approaches to algorithm-selection typically take data describing an instance as input. Input data can take the form of features derived from the instance description or fitness landscape, or can be a direct representation of the instance itself, i.e. an image or textual description. Regardless of the choice of input, there is an implicit assumption that instances that are similar will elicit similar performance from algorithm, and that a model is capable of learning this relationship. We argue that viewing algorithm-selection purely from an instance perspective can be misleading as it fails to account for how an algorithm `views' similarity between instances. We propose a novel `algorithm-centric' method for describing instances that can be used to train models for algorithm-selection: specifically, we use short probing trajectories calculated by applying a solver to an instance for a very short period of time. The approach is demonstrated to be promising, providing comparable or better results to computationally expensive landscape-based feature-based approaches. Furthermore, projecting the trajectories into a 2-dimensional space illustrates that functions that are similar from an algorithm-perspective do not necessarily correspond to the accepted categorisation of these functions from a human perspective.

Automated Algorithm Selection for Radar Network Configuration

The configuration of radar networks is a complex problem that is often performed manually by experts with the help of a simulator. Different numbers and types of radars as well as different locations that the radars shall cover give rise to different instances of the radar configuration problem. The exact modeling of these instances is complex, as the quality of the configurations depends on a large number of parameters, on internal radar processing, and on the terrains on which the radars need to be placed. Classic optimization algorithms can therefore not be applied to this problem, and we rely on "trial-and-error" black-box approaches. In this paper, we study the performances of 13~black-box optimization algorithms on 153~radar network configuration problem instances. The algorithms perform considerably better than human experts. Their ranking, however, depends on the budget of configurations that can be evaluated and on the elevation profile of the location. We therefore also investigate automated algorithm selection approaches. Our results demonstrate that a pipeline that extracts instance features from the elevation of the terrain performs on par with the classical, far more expensive approach that extracts features from the objective function.

Towards Explainable Exploratory Landscape Analysis: Extreme Feature Selection for Classifying BBOB Functions

Facilitated by the recent advances of Machine Learning (ML), the automated design of optimization heuristics is currently shaking up evolutionary computation (EC). Where the design of hand-picked guidelines for choosing a most suitable heuristic has long dominated research activities in the field, automatically trained heuristics are now seen to outperform human-derived choices even for well-researched optimization tasks. ML-based EC is therefore not any more a futuristic vision, but has become an integral part of our community. A key criticism that ML-based heuristics are often faced with is their potential lack of explainability, which may hinder future developments. This applies in particular to supervised learning techniques which extrapolate algorithms' performance based on exploratory landscape analysis (ELA). In such applications, it is not uncommon to use dozens of problem features to build the models underlying the specific algorithm selection or configuration task. Our goal in this work is to analyze whether this many features are indeed needed. Using the classification of the BBOB test functions as testbed, we show that a surprisingly small number of features -- often less than four -- can suffice to achieve a 98\% accuracy. Interestingly, the number of features required to meet this threshold is found to decrease with the problem dimension. We show that the classification accuracy transfers to settings in which several instances are involved in training and testing. In the leave-one-instance-out setting, however, classification accuracy drops significantly, and the transformation-invariance of the features becomes a decisive success factor.

Linear Matrix Factorization Embeddings for Single-objective Optimization Landscapes

Automated per-instance algorithm selection and configuration have shown promising performances for a number of classic optimization problems, including satisfiability, AI planning, and TSP. The techniques often rely on a set of features that measure some characteristics of the problem instance at hand. In the context of black-box optimization, these features have to be derived from a set of $(x,f(x))$ samples. A number of different features have been proposed in the literature, measuring, for example, the modality, the separability, or the ruggedness of the instance at hand. Several of the commonly used features, however, are highly correlated. While state-of-the-art machine learning techniques can routinely filter such correlations, they hinder explainability of the derived algorithm design techniques. We therefore propose in this work to pre-process the measured (raw) landscape features through representation learning. More precisely, we show that a linear dimensionality reduction via matrix factorization significantly contributes towards a better detection of correlation between different problem instances -- a key prerequisite for successful automated algorithm design.

Exploratory Landscape Analysis is Strongly Sensitive to the Sampling Strategy

Exploratory landscape analysis (ELA) supports supervised learning approaches for automated algorithm selection and configuration by providing sets of features that quantify the most relevant characteristics of the optimization problem at hand. In black-box optimization, where an explicit problem representation is not available, the feature values need to be approximated from a small number of sample points. In practice, uniformly sampled random point sets and Latin hypercube constructions are commonly used sampling strategies. In this work, we analyze how the sampling method and the sample size influence the quality of the feature value approximations and how this quality impacts the accuracy of a standard classification task. While, not unexpectedly, increasing the number of sample points gives more robust estimates for the feature values, to our surprise we find that the feature value approximations for different sampling strategies do not converge to the same value. This implies that approximated feature values cannot be interpreted independently of the underlying sampling strategy. As our classification experiments show, this also implies that the feature approximations used for training a classifier must stem from the same sampling strategy as those used for the actual classification tasks. As a side result we show that classifiers trained with feature values approximated by Sobol' sequences achieve higher accuracy than any of the standard sampling techniques. This may indicate improvement potential for ELA-trained machine learning models.