That Sounds Right: Auditory Self-Supervision for Dynamic Robot Manipulation

Learning to produce contact-rich, dynamic behaviors from raw sensory data has been a longstanding challenge in robotics. Prominent approaches primarily focus on using visual or tactile sensing, where unfortunately one fails to capture high-frequency interaction, while the other can be too delicate for large-scale data collection. In this work, we propose a data-centric approach to dynamic manipulation that uses an often ignored source of information: sound. We first collect a dataset of 25k interaction-sound pairs across five dynamic tasks using commodity contact microphones. Then, given this data, we leverage self-supervised learning to accelerate behavior prediction from sound. Our experiments indicate that this self-supervised 'pretraining' is crucial to achieving high performance, with a 34.5% lower MSE than plain supervised learning and a 54.3% lower MSE over visual training. Importantly, we find that when asked to generate desired sound profiles, online rollouts of our models on a UR10 robot can produce dynamic behavior that achieves an average of 11.5% improvement over supervised learning on audio similarity metrics.

RB2: Robotic Manipulation Benchmarking with a Twist

Benchmarks offer a scientific way to compare algorithms using objective performance metrics. Good benchmarks have two features: (a) they should be widely useful for many research groups; (b) and they should produce reproducible findings. In robotic manipulation research, there is a trade-off between reproducibility and broad accessibility. If the benchmark is kept restrictive (fixed hardware, objects), the numbers are reproducible but the setup becomes less general. On the other hand, a benchmark could be a loose set of protocols (e.g. object sets) but the underlying variation in setups make the results non-reproducible. In this paper, we re-imagine benchmarking for robotic manipulation as state-of-the-art algorithmic implementations, alongside the usual set of tasks and experimental protocols. The added baseline implementations will provide a way to easily recreate SOTA numbers in a new local robotic setup, thus providing credible relative rankings between existing approaches and new work. However, these local rankings could vary between different setups. To resolve this issue, we build a mechanism for pooling experimental data between labs, and thus we establish a single global ranking for existing (and proposed) SOTA algorithms. Our benchmark, called Ranking-Based Robotics Benchmark (RB2), is evaluated on tasks that are inspired from clinically validated Southampton Hand Assessment Procedures. Our benchmark was run across two different labs and reveals several surprising findings. For example, extremely simple baselines like open-loop behavior cloning, outperform more complicated models (e.g. closed loop, RNN, Offline-RL, etc.) that are preferred by the field. We hope our fellow researchers will use RB2 to improve their research's quality and rigor.

Context is Everything: Implicit Identification for Dynamics Adaptation

Understanding environment dynamics is necessary for robots to act safely and optimally in the world. In realistic scenarios, dynamics are non-stationary and the causal variables such as environment parameters cannot necessarily be precisely measured or inferred, even during training. We propose Implicit Identification for Dynamics Adaptation (IIDA), a simple method to allow predictive models to adapt to changing environment dynamics. IIDA assumes no access to the true variations in the world and instead implicitly infers properties of the environment from a small amount of contextual data. We demonstrate IIDA's ability to perform well in unseen environments through a suite of simulated experiments on MuJoCo environments and a real robot dynamic sliding task. In general, IIDA significantly reduces model error and results in higher task performance over commonly used methods. Our code and robot videos are at https://bennevans.github.io/iida/