Generating Critical Scenarios for Testing Automated Driving Systems

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) have demonstrated significant potential in revolutionizing transportation, yet ensuring their safety and reliability remains a critical challenge, especially when exposed to dynamic and unpredictable environments. Real-world testing of an Autonomous Driving System (ADS) is both expensive and risky, making simulation-based testing a preferred approach. In this paper, we propose AVASTRA, a Reinforcement Learning (RL)-based approach to generate realistic critical scenarios for testing ADSs in simulation environments. To capture the complexity of driving scenarios, AVASTRA comprehensively represents the environment by both the internal states of an ADS under-test (e.g., the status of the ADS's core components, speed, or acceleration) and the external states of the surrounding factors in the simulation environment (e.g., weather, traffic flow, or road condition). AVASTRA trains the RL agent to effectively configure the simulation environment that places the AV in dangerous situations and potentially leads it to collisions. We introduce a diverse set of actions that allows the RL agent to systematically configure both environmental conditions and traffic participants. Additionally, based on established safety requirements, we enforce heuristic constraints to ensure the realism and relevance of the generated test scenarios. AVASTRA is evaluated on two popular simulation maps with four different road configurations. Our results show AVASTRA's ability to outperform the state-of-the-art approach by generating 30% to 115% more collision scenarios. Compared to the baseline based on Random Search, AVASTRA achieves up to 275% better performance. These results highlight the effectiveness of AVASTRA in enhancing the safety testing of AVs through realistic comprehensive critical scenario generation.

Mixed Effects Deep Learning for the interpretable analysis of single cell RNA sequencing data by quantifying and visualizing batch effects

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data are often confounded by technical or biological batch effects. Existing deep learning models mitigate these effects but often discard batch-specific information, potentially losing valuable biological insights. We propose a Mixed Effects Deep Learning (MEDL) autoencoder framework that separately models batch-invariant (fixed effects) and batch-specific (random effects) components. By decoupling batch-invariant biological states from batch variations, our framework integrates both into predictive models. Our approach also generates 2D visualizations of how the same cell appears across batches, enhancing interpretability. Retaining both fixed and random effect latent spaces improves classification accuracy. We applied our framework to three datasets spanning the cardiovascular system (Healthy Heart), Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). With 147 batches in the Healthy Heart dataset, far exceeding typical numbers, we tested our framework's ability to handle many batches. In the ASD dataset, our approach captured donor heterogeneity between autistic and healthy individuals. In the AML dataset, it distinguished donor heterogeneity despite missing cell types and diseased donors exhibiting both healthy and malignant cells. These results highlight our framework's ability to characterize fixed and random effects, enhance batch effect visualization, and improve prediction accuracy across diverse datasets.

An Empirical Study on Capability of Large Language Models in Understanding Code Semantics

Large Language Models for Code (code LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across various software engineering (SE) tasks, increasing the application of code LLMs in software development. Despite the success of code LLMs, there remain significant concerns about the actual capabilities and reliability of these models, "whether these models really learn the semantics of code from the training data and leverage the learned knowledge to perform the SE tasks". In this paper, we introduce EMPICA, a comprehensive framework designed to systematically and empirically evaluate the capabilities of code LLMs in understanding code semantics. Specifically, EMPICA systematically introduces controlled modifications/transformations into the input code and examines the models' responses. Generally, code LLMs must be robust to semantically equivalent code inputs and be sensitive to non-equivalent ones for all SE tasks. Specifically, for every SE task, given an input code snippet c and its semantic equivalent variants, code LLMs must robustly produce consistent/equivalent outputs while they are expected to generate different outputs for c and its semantic non-equivalent variants. Our experimental results on three representative code understanding tasks, including code summarization, method name prediction, and output prediction, reveal that the robustness and sensitivity of the state-of-the-art code LLMs to code transformations vary significantly across tasks and transformation operators. In addition, the code LLMs exhibit better robustness to the semantic preserving transformations than their sensitivity to the semantic non-preserving transformations. These results highlight a need to enhance the model's capabilities of understanding code semantics, especially the sensitivity property.

Venomancer: Towards Imperceptible and Target-on-Demand Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning

Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning approach that maintains data privacy by training on decentralized data sources. Similar to centralized machine learning, FL is also susceptible to backdoor attacks. Most backdoor attacks in FL assume a predefined target class and require control over a large number of clients or knowledge of benign clients' information. Furthermore, they are not imperceptible and are easily detected by human inspection due to clear artifacts left on the poison data. To overcome these challenges, we propose Venomancer, an effective backdoor attack that is imperceptible and allows target-on-demand. Specifically, imperceptibility is achieved by using a visual loss function to make the poison data visually indistinguishable from the original data. Target-on-demand property allows the attacker to choose arbitrary target classes via conditional adversarial training. Additionally, experiments showed that the method is robust against state-of-the-art defenses such as Norm Clipping, Weak DP, Krum, and Multi-Krum. The source code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Venomancer-3426.

H-Fac: Memory-Efficient Optimization with Factorized Hamiltonian Descent

In this study, we introduce a novel adaptive optimizer, H-Fac, which incorporates a factorized approach to momentum and scaling parameters. Our algorithm demonstrates competitive performances on both ResNets and Vision Transformers, while achieving sublinear memory costs through the use of rank-1 parameterizations for moment estimators. We develop our algorithms based on principles derived from Hamiltonian dynamics, providing robust theoretical underpinnings. These optimization algorithms are designed to be both straightforward and adaptable, facilitating easy implementation in diverse settings.

Instance Segmentation under Occlusions via Location-aware Copy-Paste Data Augmentation

Occlusion is a long-standing problem in computer vision, particularly in instance segmentation. ACM MMSports 2023 DeepSportRadar has introduced a dataset that focuses on segmenting human subjects within a basketball context and a specialized evaluation metric for occlusion scenarios. Given the modest size of the dataset and the highly deformable nature of the objects to be segmented, this challenge demands the application of robust data augmentation techniques and wisely-chosen deep learning architectures. Our work (ranked 1st in the competition) first proposes a novel data augmentation technique, capable of generating more training samples with wider distribution. Then, we adopt a new architecture - Hybrid Task Cascade (HTC) framework with CBNetV2 as backbone and MaskIoU head to improve segmentation performance. Furthermore, we employ a Stochastic Weight Averaging (SWA) training strategy to improve the model's generalization. As a result, we achieve a remarkable occlusion score (OM) of 0.533 on the challenge dataset, securing the top-1 position on the leaderboard. Source code is available at this https://github.com/nguyendinhson-kaist/MMSports23-Seg-AutoID.

Fairness-enhancing mixed effects deep learning improves fairness on in- and out-of-distribution clustered (non-iid) data

Traditional deep learning (DL) suffers from two core problems. Firstly, it assumes training samples are independent and identically distributed. However, numerous real-world datasets group samples by shared measurements (e.g., study participants or cells), violating this assumption. In these scenarios, DL can show compromised performance, limited generalization, and interpretability issues, coupled with cluster confounding causing Type 1 and 2 errors. Secondly, models are typically trained for overall accuracy, often neglecting underrepresented groups and introducing biases in crucial areas like loan approvals or determining health insurance rates, such biases can significantly impact one's quality of life. To address both of these challenges simultaneously, we present a mixed effects deep learning (MEDL) framework. MEDL separately quantifies cluster-invariant fixed effects (FE) and cluster-specific random effects (RE) through the introduction of: 1) a cluster adversary which encourages the learning of cluster-invariant FE, 2) a Bayesian neural network which quantifies the RE, and a mixing function combining the FE an RE into a mixed-effect prediction. We marry this MEDL with adversarial debiasing, which promotes equality-of-odds fairness across FE, RE, and ME predictions for fairness-sensitive variables. We evaluated our approach using three datasets: two from census/finance focusing on income classification and one from healthcare predicting hospitalization duration, a regression task. Our framework notably enhances fairness across all sensitive variables-increasing fairness up to 82% for age, 43% for race, 86% for sex, and 27% for marital-status. Besides promoting fairness, our method maintains the robust performance and clarity of MEDL. It's versatile, suitable for various dataset types and tasks, making it broadly applicable. Our GitHub repository houses the implementation.

ARIST: An Effective API Argument Recommendation Approach

Learning and remembering to use APIs are difficult. Several techniques have been proposed to assist developers in using APIs. Most existing techniques focus on recommending the right API methods to call, but very few techniques focus on recommending API arguments. In this paper, we propose ARIST, a novel automated argument recommendation approach which suggests arguments by predicting developers' expectations when they define and use API methods. To implement this idea in the recommendation process, ARIST combines program analysis (PA), language models (LMs), and several features specialized for the recommendation task which consider the functionality of formal parameters and the positional information of code elements (e.g., variables or method calls) in the given context. In ARIST, the LMs and the recommending features are used to suggest the promising candidates identified by PA. Meanwhile, PA navigates the LMs and the features working on the set of the valid candidates which satisfy syntax, accessibility, and type-compatibility constraints defined by the programming language in use. Our evaluation on a large dataset of real-world projects shows that ARIST improves the state-of-the-art approach by 19% and 18% in top-1 precision and recall for recommending arguments of frequently-used libraries. For general argument recommendation task, i.e., recommending arguments for every method call, ARIST outperforms the baseline approaches by up to 125% top-1 accuracy. Moreover, for newly-encountered projects, ARIST achieves more than 60% top-3 accuracy when evaluating on a larger dataset. For working/maintaining projects, with a personalized LM to capture developers' coding practice, ARIST can productively rank the expected arguments at the top-1 position in 7/10 requests.

TLETA: Deep Transfer Learning and Integrated Cellular Knowledge for Estimated Time of Arrival Prediction

Vehicle arrival time prediction has been studied widely. With the emergence of IoT devices and deep learning techniques, estimated time of arrival (ETA) has become a critical component in intelligent transportation systems. Though many tools exist for ETA, ETA for special vehicles, such as ambulances, fire engines, etc., is still challenging due to the limited amount of traffic data for special vehicles. Existing works use one model for all types of vehicles, which can lead to low accuracy. To tackle this, as the first in the field, we propose a deep transfer learning framework TLETA for the driving time prediction. TLETA constructs cellular spatial-temporal knowledge grids for extracting driving patterns, combined with the road network structure embedding to build a deep neural network for ETA. TLETA contains transferable layers to support knowledge transfer between different categories of vehicles. Importantly, our transfer models only train the last layers to map the transferred knowledge, that reduces the training time significantly. The experimental studies show that our model predicts travel time with high accuracy and outperforms many state-of-the-art approaches.

AI Personification: Estimating the Personality of Language Models

Technology for open-ended language generation, a key application of artificial intelligence, has advanced to a great extent in recent years. Large-scale language models, which are trained on large corpora of text, are being used in a wide range of applications everywhere, from virtual assistants to conversational bots. While these language models output fluent text, existing research shows that these models can and do capture human biases. Many of these biases, especially those that could potentially cause harm, are being well investigated. On the other hand, studies that infer and change personality traits inherited by these models have been scarce or non-existent. In this work, we explore the personality traits of several large-scale language models designed for open-ended text generation and the datasets used for training them. Our work builds on the popular Big Five factors and develops robust methods that quantify the personality traits of these models and their underlying datasets. In particular, we trigger the models with a questionnaire designed for personality assessment and subsequently classify the text responses into quantifiable traits using a Zero-shot classifier. Our classification sheds light on an important anthropomorphic element found in such AI models and can help stakeholders decide how they should be applied and how society could perceive them. We augment our analysis by studying approaches that can alter these personalities.