DeMod: A Holistic Tool with Explainable Detection and Personalized Modification for Toxicity Censorship

Although there have been automated approaches and tools supporting toxicity censorship for social posts, most of them focus on detection. Toxicity censorship is a complex process, wherein detection is just an initial task and a user can have further needs such as rationale understanding and content modification. For this problem, we conduct a needfinding study to investigate people's diverse needs in toxicity censorship and then build a ChatGPT-based censorship tool named DeMod accordingly. DeMod is equipped with the features of explainable Detection and personalized Modification, providing fine-grained detection results, detailed explanations, and personalized modification suggestions. We also implemented the tool and recruited 35 Weibo users for evaluation. The results suggest DeMod's multiple strengths like the richness of functionality, the accuracy of censorship, and ease of use. Based on the findings, we further propose several insights into the design of content censorship systems.

RAH! RecSys-Assistant-Human: A Human-Central Recommendation Framework with Large Language Models

The recommendation ecosystem involves interactions between recommender systems(Computer) and users(Human). Orthogonal to the perspective of recommender systems, we attempt to utilize LLMs from the perspective of users and propose a more human-central recommendation framework named RAH, which consists of Recommender system, Assistant and Human. The assistant is a LLM-based and personal proxy for a human to achieve user satisfaction. The assistant plays a non-invasion role and the RAH framework can adapt to different recommender systems and user groups. Subsequently, we implement and evaluate the RAH framework for learning user personalities and proxy human feedback. The experiment shows that (1) using learn-action-critic and reflection mechanisms can lead more aligned personality and (2) our assistant can effectively proxy human feedback and help adjust recommender systems. Finally, we discuss further strategies in the RAH framework to address human-central concerns including user control, privacy and fairness.