Zero-resource Speech Translation and Recognition with LLMs

Despite recent advancements in speech processing, zero-resource speech translation (ST) and automatic speech recognition (ASR) remain challenging problems. In this work, we propose to leverage a multilingual Large Language Model (LLM) to perform ST and ASR in languages for which the model has never seen paired audio-text data. We achieve this by using a pre-trained multilingual speech encoder, a multilingual LLM, and a lightweight adaptation module that maps the audio representations to the token embedding space of the LLM. We perform several experiments both in ST and ASR to understand how to best train the model and what data has the most impact on performance in previously unseen languages. In ST, our best model is capable to achieve BLEU scores over 23 in CoVoST2 for two previously unseen languages, while in ASR, we achieve WERs of up to 28.2\%. We finally show that the performance of our system is bounded by the ability of the LLM to output text in the desired language.

Generalized zero-shot audio-to-intent classification

Spoken language understanding systems using audio-only data are gaining popularity, yet their ability to handle unseen intents remains limited. In this study, we propose a generalized zero-shot audio-to-intent classification framework with only a few sample text sentences per intent. To achieve this, we first train a supervised audio-to-intent classifier by making use of a self-supervised pre-trained model. We then leverage a neural audio synthesizer to create audio embeddings for sample text utterances and perform generalized zero-shot classification on unseen intents using cosine similarity. We also propose a multimodal training strategy that incorporates lexical information into the audio representation to improve zero-shot performance. Our multimodal training approach improves the accuracy of zero-shot intent classification on unseen intents of SLURP by 2.75% and 18.2% for the SLURP and internal goal-oriented dialog datasets, respectively, compared to audio-only training.