Introducing Milabench: Benchmarking Accelerators for AI

AI workloads, particularly those driven by deep learning, are introducing novel usage patterns to high-performance computing (HPC) systems that are not comprehensively captured by standard HPC benchmarks. As one of the largest academic research centers dedicated to deep learning, Mila identified the need to develop a custom benchmarking suite to address the diverse requirements of its community, which consists of over 1,000 researchers. This report introduces Milabench, the resulting benchmarking suite. Its design was informed by an extensive literature review encompassing 867 papers, as well as surveys conducted with Mila researchers. This rigorous process led to the selection of 26 primary benchmarks tailored for procurement evaluations, alongside 16 optional benchmarks for in-depth analysis. We detail the design methodology, the structure of the benchmarking suite, and provide performance evaluations using GPUs from NVIDIA, AMD, and Intel. The Milabench suite is open source and can be accessed at github.com/mila-iqia/milabench.

Accounting for Variance in Machine Learning Benchmarks

Strong empirical evidence that one machine-learning algorithm A outperforms another one B ideally calls for multiple trials optimizing the learning pipeline over sources of variation such as data sampling, data augmentation, parameter initialization, and hyperparameters choices. This is prohibitively expensive, and corners are cut to reach conclusions. We model the whole benchmarking process, revealing that variance due to data sampling, parameter initialization and hyperparameter choice impact markedly the results. We analyze the predominant comparison methods used today in the light of this variance. We show a counter-intuitive result that adding more sources of variation to an imperfect estimator approaches better the ideal estimator at a 51 times reduction in compute cost. Building on these results, we study the error rate of detecting improvements, on five different deep-learning tasks/architectures. This study leads us to propose recommendations for performance comparisons.