Solution for SMART-101 Challenge of CVPR Multi-modal Algorithmic Reasoning Task 2024

In this paper, the solution of HYU MLLAB KT Team to the Multimodal Algorithmic Reasoning Task: SMART-101 CVPR 2024 Challenge is presented. Beyond conventional visual question-answering problems, the SMART-101 challenge aims to achieve human-level multimodal understanding by tackling complex visio-linguistic puzzles designed for children in the 6-8 age group. To solve this problem, we suggest two main ideas. First, to utilize the reasoning ability of a large-scale language model (LLM), the given visual cues (images) are grounded in the text modality. For this purpose, we generate highly detailed text captions that describe the context of the image and use these captions as input for the LLM. Second, due to the nature of puzzle images, which often contain various geometric visual patterns, we utilize an object detection algorithm to ensure these patterns are not overlooked in the captioning process. We employed the SAM algorithm, which can detect various-size objects, to capture the visual features of these geometric patterns and used this information as input for the LLM. Under the puzzle split configuration, we achieved an option selection accuracy Oacc of 29.5 on the test set and a weighted option selection accuracy (WOSA) of 27.1 on the challenge set.

Chain-of-Feedback: Mitigating the Effects of Inconsistency in Responses

Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently suffer from knowledge-intensive questions, often being inconsistent by providing different outputs despite given the same input. The response quality worsens when the user expresses a firm opposing stance which causes the LLMs to adjust its response despite the correct initial one. These behaviors decrease the reliability and validity of the responses provided by these models. In this paper, we attempt to 1) raise awareness of the inherent risks that follow from overly relying on AI agents like ChatGPT by showing how Chain-of-Feedback (CoF) triggers LLMs to deviate more from the actual answer and 2) suggest a novel prompting method, Recursive Chain of Feedback (R-CoF), that we are conducting further study. The CoF system takes in an open-ended multi-step question. Then, we repetitively provide meaningless feedback requesting another attempt. Our preliminary experiments show that such feedback only decreases the quality of the response. On the other hand, to mitigate the effects of the aforementioned inconsistencies, we present a novel method of recursively revising the initial incorrect reasoning provided by the LLM by repetitively breaking down each incorrect step into smaller individual problems.

Goal Driven Discovery of Distributional Differences via Language Descriptions

Mining large corpora can generate useful discoveries but is time-consuming for humans. We formulate a new task, D5, that automatically discovers differences between two large corpora in a goal-driven way. The task input is a problem comprising a research goal "$\textit{comparing the side effects of drug A and drug B}$" and a corpus pair (two large collections of patients' self-reported reactions after taking each drug). The output is a language description (discovery) of how these corpora differ (patients taking drug A "$\textit{mention feelings of paranoia}$" more often). We build a D5 system, and to quantitatively measure its performance, we 1) contribute a meta-dataset, OpenD5, aggregating 675 open-ended problems ranging across business, social sciences, humanities, machine learning, and health, and 2) propose a set of unified evaluation metrics: validity, relevance, novelty, and significance. With the dataset and the unified metrics, we confirm that language models can use the goals to propose more relevant, novel, and significant candidate discoveries. Finally, our system produces discoveries previously unknown to the authors on a wide range of applications in OpenD5, including temporal and demographic differences in discussion topics, political stances and stereotypes in speech, insights in commercial reviews, and error patterns in NLP models.