A Cautionary Tale About "Neutrally" Informative AI Tools Ahead of the 2025 Federal Elections in Germany

In this study, we examine the reliability of AI-based Voting Advice Applications (VAAs) and large language models (LLMs) in providing objective political information. Our analysis is based upon a comparison with party responses to 38 statements of the Wahl-O-Mat, a well-established German online tool that helps inform voters by comparing their views with political party positions. For the LLMs, we identify significant biases. They exhibit a strong alignment (over 75% on average) with left-wing parties and a substantially lower alignment with center-right (smaller 50%) and right-wing parties (around 30%). Furthermore, for the VAAs, intended to objectively inform voters, we found substantial deviations from the parties' stated positions in Wahl-O-Mat: While one VAA deviated in 25% of cases, another VAA showed deviations in more than 50% of cases. For the latter, we even observed that simple prompt injections led to severe hallucinations, including false claims such as non-existent connections between political parties and right-wing extremist ties.

Exploring the Impact of Outlier Variability on Anomaly Detection Evaluation Metrics

Anomaly detection is a dynamic field, in which the evaluation of models plays a critical role in understanding their effectiveness. The selection and interpretation of the evaluation metrics are pivotal, particularly in scenarios with varying amounts of anomalies. This study focuses on examining the behaviors of three widely used anomaly detection metrics under different conditions: F1 score, Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under Curve (ROC AUC), and Precision-Recall Curve Area Under Curve (AUCPR). Our study critically analyzes the extent to which these metrics provide reliable and distinct insights into model performance, especially considering varying levels of outlier fractions and contamination thresholds in datasets. Through a comprehensive experimental setup involving widely recognized algorithms for anomaly detection, we present findings that challenge the conventional understanding of these metrics and reveal nuanced behaviors under varying conditions. We demonstrated that while the F1 score and AUCPR are sensitive to outlier fractions, the ROC AUC maintains consistency and is unaffected by such variability. Additionally, under conditions of a fixed outlier fraction in the test set, we observe an alignment between ROC AUC and AUCPR, indicating that the choice between these two metrics may be less critical in such scenarios. The results of our study contribute to a more refined understanding of metric selection and interpretation in anomaly detection, offering valuable insights for both researchers and practitioners in the field.

About Test-time training for outlier detection

In this paper, we introduce DOUST, our method applying test-time training for outlier detection, significantly improving the detection performance. After thoroughly evaluating our algorithm on common benchmark datasets, we discuss a common problem and show that it disappears with a large enough test set. Thus, we conclude that under reasonable conditions, our algorithm can reach almost supervised performance even when no labeled outliers are given.

On the Effectiveness of Heterogeneous Ensemble Methods for Re-identification

In this contribution, we introduce a novel ensemble method for the re-identification of industrial entities, using images of chipwood pallets and galvanized metal plates as dataset examples. Our algorithms replace commonly used, complex siamese neural networks with an ensemble of simplified, rudimentary models, providing wider applicability, especially in hardware-restricted scenarios. Each ensemble sub-model uses different types of extracted features of the given data as its input, allowing for the creation of effective ensembles in a fraction of the training duration needed for more complex state-of-the-art models. We reach state-of-the-art performance at our task, with a Rank-1 accuracy of over 77% and a Rank-10 accuracy of over 99%, and introduce five distinct feature extraction approaches, and study their combination using different ensemble methods.

On the Consistency and Robustness of Saliency Explanations for Time Series Classification

Interpretable machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence have become essential in many applications. The trade-off between interpretability and model performance is the traitor to developing intrinsic and model-agnostic interpretation methods. Although model explanation approaches have achieved significant success in vision and natural language domains, explaining time series remains challenging. The complex pattern in the feature domain, coupled with the additional temporal dimension, hinders efficient interpretation. Saliency maps have been applied to interpret time series windows as images. However, they are not naturally designed for sequential data, thus suffering various issues. This paper extensively analyzes the consistency and robustness of saliency maps for time series features and temporal attribution. Specifically, we examine saliency explanations from both perturbation-based and gradient-based explanation models in a time series classification task. Our experimental results on five real-world datasets show that they all lack consistent and robust performances to some extent. By drawing attention to the flawed saliency explanation models, we motivate to develop consistent and robust explanations for time series classification.

Redundancy-aware unsupervised rankings for collections of gene sets

The biological roles of gene sets are used to group them into collections. These collections are often characterized by being high-dimensional, overlapping, and redundant families of sets, thus precluding a straightforward interpretation and study of their content. Bioinformatics looked for solutions to reduce their dimension or increase their intepretability. One possibility lies in aggregating overlapping gene sets to create larger pathways, but the modified biological pathways are hardly biologically justifiable. We propose to use importance scores to rank the pathways in the collections studying the context from a set covering perspective. The proposed Shapley values-based scores consider the distribution of the singletons and the size of the sets in the families; Furthermore, a trick allows us to circumvent the usual exponential complexity of Shapley values' computation. Finally, we address the challenge of including a redundancy awareness in the obtained rankings where, in our case, sets are redundant if they show prominent intersections. The rankings can be used to reduce the dimension of collections of gene sets, such that they show lower redundancy and still a high coverage of the genes. We further investigate the impact of our selection on Gene Sets Enrichment Analysis. The proposed method shows a practical utility in bioinformatics to increase the interpretability of the collections of gene sets and a step forward to include redundancy into Shapley values computations.

Prototypes as Explanation for Time Series Anomaly Detection

Detecting abnormal patterns that deviate from a certain regular repeating pattern in time series is essential in many big data applications. However, the lack of labels, the dynamic nature of time series data, and unforeseeable abnormal behaviors make the detection process challenging. Despite the success of recent deep anomaly detection approaches, the mystical mechanisms in such black-box models have become a new challenge in safety-critical applications. The lack of model transparency and prediction reliability hinders further breakthroughs in such domains. This paper proposes ProtoAD, using prototypes as the example-based explanation for the state of regular patterns during anomaly detection. Without significant impact on the detection performance, prototypes shed light on the deep black-box models and provide intuitive understanding for domain experts and stakeholders. We extend the widely used prototype learning in classification problems into anomaly detection. By visualizing both the latent space and input space prototypes, we intuitively demonstrate how regular data are modeled and why specific patterns are considered abnormal.

Interpretable Anomaly Detection via Discrete Optimization

Anomaly detection is essential in many application domains, such as cyber security, law enforcement, medicine, and fraud protection. However, the decision-making of current deep learning approaches is notoriously hard to understand, which often limits their practical applicability. To overcome this limitation, we propose a framework for learning inherently interpretable anomaly detectors from sequential data. More specifically, we consider the task of learning a deterministic finite automaton (DFA) from a given multi-set of unlabeled sequences. We show that this problem is computationally hard and develop two learning algorithms based on constraint optimization. Moreover, we introduce novel regularization schemes for our optimization problems that improve the overall interpretability of our DFAs. Using a prototype implementation, we demonstrate that our approach shows promising results in terms of accuracy and F1 score.

RODD: Robust Outlier Detection in Data Cubes

Data cubes are multidimensional databases, often built from several separate databases, that serve as flexible basis for data analysis. Surprisingly, outlier detection on data cubes has not yet been treated extensively. In this work, we provide the first framework to evaluate robust outlier detection methods in data cubes (RODD). We introduce a novel random forest-based outlier detection approach (RODD-RF) and compare it with more traditional methods based on robust location estimators. We propose a general type of test data and examine all methods in a simulation study. Moreover, we apply ROOD-RF to real world data. The results show that RODD-RF can lead to improved outlier detection.

Unsupervised Features Ranking via Coalitional Game Theory for Categorical Data

Not all real-world data are labeled, and when labels are not available, it is often costly to obtain them. Moreover, as many algorithms suffer from the curse of dimensionality, reducing the features in the data to a smaller set is often of great utility. Unsupervised feature selection aims to reduce the number of features, often using feature importance scores to quantify the relevancy of single features to the task at hand. These scores can be based only on the distribution of variables and the quantification of their interactions. The previous literature, mainly investigating anomaly detection and clusters, fails to address the redundancy-elimination issue. We propose an evaluation of correlations among features to compute feature importance scores representing the contribution of single features in explaining the dataset's structure. Based on Coalitional Game Theory, our feature importance scores include a notion of redundancy awareness making them a tool to achieve redundancy-free feature selection. We show that the deriving features' selection outperforms competing methods in lowering the redundancy rate while maximizing the information contained in the data. We also introduce an approximated version of the algorithm to reduce the complexity of Shapley values' computations.