It's Simplex! Disaggregating Measures to Improve Certified Robustness

Certified robustness circumvents the fragility of defences against adversarial attacks, by endowing model predictions with guarantees of class invariance for attacks up to a calculated size. While there is value in these certifications, the techniques through which we assess their performance do not present a proper accounting of their strengths and weaknesses, as their analysis has eschewed consideration of performance over individual samples in favour of aggregated measures. By considering the potential output space of certified models, this work presents two distinct approaches to improve the analysis of certification mechanisms, that allow for both dataset-independent and dataset-dependent measures of certification performance. Embracing such a perspective uncovers new certification approaches, which have the potential to more than double the achievable radius of certification, relative to current state-of-the-art. Empirical evaluation verifies that our new approach can certify $9\%$ more samples at noise scale $\sigma = 1$, with greater relative improvements observed as the difficulty of the predictive task increases.

Enhancing the Antidote: Improved Pointwise Certifications against Poisoning Attacks

Poisoning attacks can disproportionately influence model behaviour by making small changes to the training corpus. While defences against specific poisoning attacks do exist, they in general do not provide any guarantees, leaving them potentially countered by novel attacks. In contrast, by examining worst-case behaviours Certified Defences make it possible to provide guarantees of the robustness of a sample against adversarial attacks modifying a finite number of training samples, known as pointwise certification. We achieve this by exploiting both Differential Privacy and the Sampled Gaussian Mechanism to ensure the invariance of prediction for each testing instance against finite numbers of poisoned examples. In doing so, our model provides guarantees of adversarial robustness that are more than twice as large as those provided by prior certifications.

Failure-tolerant Distributed Learning for Anomaly Detection in Wireless Networks

The analysis of distributed techniques is often focused upon their efficiency, without considering their robustness (or lack thereof). Such a consideration is particularly important when devices or central servers can fail, which can potentially cripple distributed systems. When such failures arise in wireless communications networks, important services that they use/provide (like anomaly detection) can be left inoperable and can result in a cascade of security problems. In this paper, we present a novel method to address these risks by combining both flat- and star-topologies, combining the performance and reliability benefits of both. We refer to this method as "Tol-FL", due to its increased failure-tolerance as compared to the technique of Federated Learning. Our approach both limits device failure risks while outperforming prior methods by up to 8% in terms of anomaly detection AUROC in a range of realistic settings that consider client as well as server failure, all while reducing communication costs. This performance demonstrates that Tol-FL is a highly suitable method for distributed model training for anomaly detection, especially in the domain of wireless networks.

Exploiting Certified Defences to Attack Randomised Smoothing

In guaranteeing that no adversarial examples exist within a bounded region, certification mechanisms play an important role in neural network robustness. Concerningly, this work demonstrates that the certification mechanisms themselves introduce a new, heretofore undiscovered attack surface, that can be exploited by attackers to construct smaller adversarial perturbations. While these attacks exist outside the certification region in no way invalidate certifications, minimising a perturbation's norm significantly increases the level of difficulty associated with attack detection. In comparison to baseline attacks, our new framework yields smaller perturbations more than twice as frequently as any other approach, resulting in an up to $34 \%$ reduction in the median perturbation norm. That this approach also requires $90 \%$ less computational time than approaches like PGD. That these reductions are possible suggests that exploiting this new attack vector would allow attackers to more frequently construct hard to detect adversarial attacks, by exploiting the very systems designed to defend deployed models.

Double Bubble, Toil and Trouble: Enhancing Certified Robustness through Transitivity

In response to subtle adversarial examples flipping classifications of neural network models, recent research has promoted certified robustness as a solution. There, invariance of predictions to all norm-bounded attacks is achieved through randomised smoothing of network inputs. Today's state-of-the-art certifications make optimal use of the class output scores at the input instance under test: no better radius of certification (under the $L_2$ norm) is possible given only these score. However, it is an open question as to whether such lower bounds can be improved using local information around the instance under test. In this work, we demonstrate how today's "optimal" certificates can be improved by exploiting both the transitivity of certifications, and the geometry of the input space, giving rise to what we term Geometrically-Informed Certified Robustness. By considering the smallest distance to points on the boundary of a set of certifications this approach improves certifications for more than $80\%$ of Tiny-Imagenet instances, yielding an on average $5 \%$ increase in the associated certification. When incorporating training time processes that enhance the certified radius, our technique shows even more promising results, with a uniform $4$ percentage point increase in the achieved certified radius.