Failure-tolerant Distributed Learning for Anomaly Detection in Wireless Networks

The analysis of distributed techniques is often focused upon their efficiency, without considering their robustness (or lack thereof). Such a consideration is particularly important when devices or central servers can fail, which can potentially cripple distributed systems. When such failures arise in wireless communications networks, important services that they use/provide (like anomaly detection) can be left inoperable and can result in a cascade of security problems. In this paper, we present a novel method to address these risks by combining both flat- and star-topologies, combining the performance and reliability benefits of both. We refer to this method as "Tol-FL", due to its increased failure-tolerance as compared to the technique of Federated Learning. Our approach both limits device failure risks while outperforming prior methods by up to 8% in terms of anomaly detection AUROC in a range of realistic settings that consider client as well as server failure, all while reducing communication costs. This performance demonstrates that Tol-FL is a highly suitable method for distributed model training for anomaly detection, especially in the domain of wireless networks.

Defending Regression Learners Against Poisoning Attacks

Regression models, which are widely used from engineering applications to financial forecasting, are vulnerable to targeted malicious attacks such as training data poisoning, through which adversaries can manipulate their predictions. Previous works that attempt to address this problem rely on assumptions about the nature of the attack/attacker or overestimate the knowledge of the learner, making them impractical. We introduce a novel Local Intrinsic Dimensionality (LID) based measure called N-LID that measures the local deviation of a given data point's LID with respect to its neighbors. We then show that N-LID can distinguish poisoned samples from normal samples and propose an N-LID based defense approach that makes no assumptions of the attacker. Through extensive numerical experiments with benchmark datasets, we show that the proposed defense mechanism outperforms the state of the art defenses in terms of prediction accuracy (up to 76% lower MSE compared to an undefended ridge model) and running time.