Expanding and Analyzing ODAQ -- the Open Dataset of Audio Quality

The Open Dataset of Audio Quality (ODAQ) was recently introduced to address the scarcity of openly available audio datasets with corresponding subjective quality scores. The dataset, released under permissive licenses, comprises audio material processed using six different signal processing methods operating at five quality levels, along with corresponding subjective test results. To expand the dataset, we provided listener training to university students to conduct further subjective tests and obtained results consistent with previous expert listeners. We also showed how different training approaches affect the use of absolute scales and anchors. The expanded dataset now comprises results from three international laboratories providing a total of 42 listeners and 10080 subjective scores. This paper provides the details of the expansion and an in-depth analysis. As part of this analysis, we initiate the use of ODAQ as a benchmark to evaluate objective audio quality metrics in their ability to predict subjective scores

On the Relation Between Speech Quality and Quantized Latent Representations of Neural Codecs

Neural audio signal codecs have attracted significant attention in recent years. In essence, the impressive low bitrate achieved by such encoders is enabled by learning an abstract representation that captures the properties of encoded signals, e.g., speech. In this work, we investigate the relation between the latent representation of the input signal learned by a neural codec and the quality of speech signals. To do so, we introduce Latent-representation-to-Quantization error Ratio (LQR) measures, which quantify the distance from the idealized neural codec's speech signal model for a given speech signal. We compare the proposed metrics to intrusive measures as well as data-driven supervised methods using two subjective speech quality datasets. This analysis shows that the proposed LQR correlates strongly (up to 0.9 Pearson's correlation) with the subjective quality of speech. Despite being a non-intrusive metric, this yields a competitive performance with, or even better than, other pre-trained and intrusive measures. These results show that LQR is a promising basis for more sophisticated speech quality measures.

ConcateNet: Dialogue Separation Using Local And Global Feature Concatenation

Dialogue separation involves isolating a dialogue signal from a mixture, such as a movie or a TV program. This can be a necessary step to enable dialogue enhancement for broadcast-related applications. In this paper, ConcateNet for dialogue separation is proposed, which is based on a novel approach for processing local and global features aimed at better generalization for out-of-domain signals. ConcateNet is trained using a noise reduction-focused, publicly available dataset and evaluated using three datasets: two noise reduction-focused datasets (in-domain), which show competitive performance for ConcateNet, and a broadcast-focused dataset (out-of-domain), which verifies the better generalization performance for the proposed architecture compared to considered state-of-the-art noise-reduction methods.

Speech Loudness in Broadcasting and Streaming

The introduction and regulation of loudness in broadcasting and streaming brought clear benefits to the audience, e.g., a level of uniformity across programs and channels. Yet, speech loudness is frequently reported as being too low in certain passages, which can hinder the full understanding and enjoyment of movies and TV programs. This paper proposes expanding the set of loudness-based measures typically used in the industry. We focus on speech loudness, and we show that, when clean speech is not available, Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) can be used to isolate the speech signal and so to accurately estimate speech loudness, providing a more precise estimate compared to speech-gated loudness. Moreover, we define critical passages, i.e., passages in which speech is likely to be hard to understand. Critical passages are defined based on the local Speech Loudness Deviation (SLD) and the local Speech-to-Background Loudness Difference (SBLD), as SLD and SBLD significantly contribute to intelligibility and listening effort. In contrast to other more comprehensive measures of intelligibility and listening effort, SLD and SBLD can be straightforwardly measured, are intuitive, and, most importantly, can be easily controlled by adjusting the speech level in the mix or by enabling personalization at the user's end. Finally, examples are provided that show how the detection of critical passages can support the evaluation and control of the speech signal during and after content production.

ODAQ: Open Dataset of Audio Quality

Research into the prediction and analysis of perceived audio quality is hampered by the scarcity of openly available datasets of audio signals accompanied by corresponding subjective quality scores. To address this problem, we present the Open Dataset of Audio Quality (ODAQ), a new dataset containing the results of a MUSHRA listening test conducted with expert listeners from 2 international laboratories. ODAQ contains 240 audio samples and corresponding quality scores. Each audio sample is rated by 26 listeners. The audio samples are stereo audio signals sampled at 44.1 or 48 kHz and are processed by a total of 6 method classes, each operating at different quality levels. The processing method classes are designed to generate quality degradations possibly encountered during audio coding and source separation, and the quality levels for each method class span the entire quality range. The diversity of the processing methods, the large span of quality levels, the high sampling frequency, and the pool of international listeners make ODAQ particularly suited for further research into subjective and objective audio quality. The dataset is released with permissive licenses, and the software used to conduct the listening test is also made publicly available.

Predicting Preferred Dialogue-to-Background Loudness Difference in Dialogue-Separated Audio

Dialogue Enhancement (DE) enables the rebalancing of dialogue and background sounds to fit personal preferences and needs in the context of broadcast audio. When individual audio stems are unavailable from production, Dialogue Separation (DS) can be applied to the final audio mixture to obtain estimates of these stems. This work focuses on Preferred Loudness Differences (PLDs) between dialogue and background sounds. While previous studies determined the PLD through a listening test employing original stems from production, stems estimated by DS are used in the present study. In addition, a larger variety of signal classes is considered. PLDs vary substantially across individuals (average interquartile range: 5.7 LU). Despite this variability, PLDs are found to be highly dependent on the signal type under consideration, and it is shown that median PLDs can be predicted using objective intelligibility metrics. Two existing baseline prediction methods - intended for use with original stems - displayed a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 7.5 LU and 5 LU, respectively. A modified baseline (MAE: 3.2 LU) and an alternative approach (MAE: 2.5 LU) are proposed. Results support the viability of processing final broadcast mixtures with DS and offering an alternative remixing that accounts for median PLDs.

Better Together: Dialogue Separation and Voice Activity Detection for Audio Personalization in TV

In TV services, dialogue level personalization is key to meeting user preferences and needs. When dialogue and background sounds are not separately available from the production stage, Dialogue Separation (DS) can estimate them to enable personalization. DS was shown to provide clear benefits for the end user. Still, the estimated signals are not perfect, and some leakage can be introduced. This is undesired, especially during passages without dialogue. We propose to combine DS and Voice Activity Detection (VAD), both recently proposed for TV audio. When their combination suggests dialogue inactivity, background components leaking in the dialogue estimate are reassigned to the background estimate. A clear improvement of the audio quality is shown for dialogue-free signals, without performance drops when dialogue is active. A post-processed VAD estimate with improved detection accuracy is also generated. It is concluded that DS and VAD can improve each other and are better used together.

Dialogue Enhancement and Listening Effort in Broadcast Audio: A Multimodal Evaluation

Dialogue enhancement (DE) plays a vital role in broadcasting, enabling the personalization of the relative level between foreground speech and background music and effects. DE has been shown to improve the quality of experience, intelligibility, and self-reported listening effort (LE). A physiological indicator of LE known from audiology studies is pupil size. The relation between pupil size and LE is typically studied using artificial sentences and background noises not encountered in broadcast content. This work evaluates the effect of DE on LE in a multimodal manner that includes pupil size (tracked by a VR headset) and real-world audio excerpts from TV. Under ideal listening conditions, 28 normal-hearing participants listened to 30 audio excerpts presented in random order and processed by conditions varying the relative level between foreground and background audio. One of these conditions employed a recently proposed source separation system to attenuate the background given the original mixture as the sole input. After listening to each excerpt, subjects were asked to repeat the heard sentence and self-report the LE. Mean pupil dilation and peak pupil dilation were analyzed and compared with the self-report and the word recall rate. The multimodal evaluation shows a consistent trend of decreasing LE along with decreasing background level. DE, also when enabled by source separation, significantly reduces the pupil size as well as the self-reported LE. This highlights the benefit of personalization functionalities at the user's end.

Geometrically-Motivated Primary-Ambient Decomposition With Center-Channel Extraction

A geometrically-motivated method for primary-ambient decomposition is proposed and evaluated in an up-mixing application. The method consists of two steps, accommodating a particularly intuitive explanation. The first step consists of signal-adaptive rotations applied on the input stereo scene, which translate the primary sound sources into the center of the rotated scene. The second step applies a center-channel extraction method, based on a simple signal model and optimal in the mean-squared-error sense. The performance is evaluated by using the estimated ambient component to enable surround sound starting from real-world stereo signals. The participants in the reported listening test are asked to adjust the audio scene envelopment and find the audio settings that pleases them the most. The possibility for up-mixing enabled by the proposed method is used extensively, and the user satisfaction is significantly increased compared to the original stereo mix.

Sampling Frequency Independent Dialogue Separation

In some DNNs for audio source separation, the relevant model parameters are independent of the sampling frequency of the audio used for training. Considering the application of dialogue separation, this is shown for two DNN architectures: a U-Net and a fully-convolutional model. The models are trained with audio sampled at 8 kHz. The learned parameters are transferred to models for processing audio at 48 kHz. The separated audio sources are compared with the ones produced by the same model architectures trained with 48 kHz versions of the same training data. A listening test and computational measures show that there is no significant perceptual difference between the models trained with 8 kHz or with 48 kHz. This transferability of the learned parameters allows for a faster and computationally less costly training. It also enables using training datasets available at a lower sampling frequency than the one needed by the application at hand, or using data collections with multiple sampling frequencies.