Prompting-based Synthetic Data Generation for Few-Shot Question Answering

Although language models (LMs) have boosted the performance of Question Answering, they still need plenty of data. Data annotation, in contrast, is a time-consuming process. This especially applies to Question Answering, where possibly large documents have to be parsed and annotated with questions and their corresponding answers. Furthermore, Question Answering models often only work well for the domain they were trained on. Since annotation is costly, we argue that domain-agnostic knowledge from LMs, such as linguistic understanding, is sufficient to create a well-curated dataset. With this motivation, we show that using large language models can improve Question Answering performance on various datasets in the few-shot setting compared to state-of-the-art approaches. For this, we perform data generation leveraging the Prompting framework, suggesting that language models contain valuable task-agnostic knowledge that can be used beyond the common pre-training/fine-tuning scheme. As a result, we consistently outperform previous approaches on few-shot Question Answering.

Improving Low-Resource Question Answering using Active Learning in Multiple Stages

Neural approaches have become very popular in the domain of Question Answering, however they require a large amount of annotated data. Furthermore, they often yield very good performance but only in the domain they were trained on. In this work we propose a novel approach that combines data augmentation via question-answer generation with Active Learning to improve performance in low resource settings, where the target domains are diverse in terms of difficulty and similarity to the source domain. We also investigate Active Learning for question answering in different stages, overall reducing the annotation effort of humans. For this purpose, we consider target domains in realistic settings, with an extremely low amount of annotated samples but with many unlabeled documents, which we assume can be obtained with little effort. Additionally, we assume sufficient amount of labeled data from the source domain is available. We perform extensive experiments to find the best setup for incorporating domain experts. Our findings show that our novel approach, where humans are incorporated as early as possible in the process, boosts performance in the low-resource, domain-specific setting, allowing for low-labeling-effort question answering systems in new, specialized domains. They further demonstrate how human annotation affects the performance of QA depending on the stage it is performed.

Enabling Reproducibility and Meta-learning Through a Lifelong Database of Experiments (LDE)

Artificial Intelligence (AI) development is inherently iterative and experimental. Over the course of normal development, especially with the advent of automated AI, hundreds or thousands of experiments are generated and are often lost or never examined again. There is a lost opportunity to document these experiments and learn from them at scale, but the complexity of tracking and reproducing these experiments is often prohibitive to data scientists. We present the Lifelong Database of Experiments (LDE) that automatically extracts and stores linked metadata from experiment artifacts and provides features to reproduce these artifacts and perform meta-learning across them. We store context from multiple stages of the AI development lifecycle including datasets, pipelines, how each is configured, and training runs with information about their runtime environment. The standardized nature of the stored metadata allows for querying and aggregation, especially in terms of ranking artifacts by performance metrics. We exhibit the capabilities of the LDE by reproducing an existing meta-learning study and storing the reproduced metadata in our system. Then, we perform two experiments on this metadata: 1) examining the reproducibility and variability of the performance metrics and 2) implementing a number of meta-learning algorithms on top of the data and examining how variability in experimental results impacts recommendation performance. The experimental results suggest significant variation in performance, especially depending on dataset configurations; this variation carries over when meta-learning is built on top of the results, with performance improving when using aggregated results. This suggests that a system that automatically collects and aggregates results such as the LDE not only assists in implementing meta-learning but may also improve its performance.