Cognify: Supercharging Gen-AI Workflows With Hierarchical Autotuning

Today's gen-AI workflows that involve multiple ML model calls, tool/API calls, data retrieval, or generic code execution are often tuned manually in an ad-hoc way that is both time-consuming and error-prone. In this paper, we propose a systematic approach for automatically tuning gen-AI workflows. Our key insight is that gen-AI workflows can benefit from structure, operator, and prompt changes, but unique properties of gen-AI workflows require new optimization techniques. We propose AdaSeek, an adaptive hierarchical search algorithm for autotuning gen-AI workflows. AdaSeek organizes workflow tuning methods into different layers based on the user-specified total search budget and distributes the budget across different layers based on the complexity of each layer. During its hierarchical search, AdaSeek redistributes the search budget from less useful to more promising tuning configurations based on workflow-level evaluation results. We implement AdaSeek in a workflow autotuning framework called Cognify and evaluate Cognify using six types of workflows such as RAG-based QA and text-to-SQL transformation. Overall, Cognify improves these workflows' generation quality by up to 2.8x, reduces execution monetary cost by up to 10x, and reduces end-to-end latency by 2.7x.

APIServe: Efficient API Support for Large-Language Model Inferencing

Large language models are increasingly integrated with external tools and APIs like ChatGPT plugins to extend their capability beyond language-centric tasks. However, today's LLM inference systems are designed for standalone LLMs. They treat API calls as new requests, causing unnecessary recomputation of already computed contexts, which accounts for 37-40% of total model forwarding time. This paper presents APIServe, the first LLM inference framework targeting API-augmented LLMs. APISERVE minimizes the GPU resource waste caused by API calls and dedicates saved memory for serving more requests. APISERVE improves the overall serving throughput by 1.6x and completes 2x more requests per second compared to the state-of-the-art LLM inference systems.

The Effect of Model Size on Worst-Group Generalization

Overparameterization is shown to result in poor test accuracy on rare subgroups under a variety of settings where subgroup information is known. To gain a more complete picture, we consider the case where subgroup information is unknown. We investigate the effect of model size on worst-group generalization under empirical risk minimization (ERM) across a wide range of settings, varying: 1) architectures (ResNet, VGG, or BERT), 2) domains (vision or natural language processing), 3) model size (width or depth), and 4) initialization (with pre-trained or random weights). Our systematic evaluation reveals that increasing model size does not hurt, and may help, worst-group test performance under ERM across all setups. In particular, increasing pre-trained model size consistently improves performance on Waterbirds and MultiNLI. We advise practitioners to use larger pre-trained models when subgroup labels are unknown.