Inference-Time Computations for LLM Reasoning and Planning: A Benchmark and Insights

We examine the reasoning and planning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in solving complex tasks. Recent advances in inference-time techniques demonstrate the potential to enhance LLM reasoning without additional training by exploring intermediate steps during inference. Notably, OpenAI's o1 model shows promising performance through its novel use of multi-step reasoning and verification. Here, we explore how scaling inference-time techniques can improve reasoning and planning, focusing on understanding the tradeoff between computational cost and performance. To this end, we construct a comprehensive benchmark, known as Sys2Bench, and perform extensive experiments evaluating existing inference-time techniques on eleven diverse tasks across five categories, including arithmetic reasoning, logical reasoning, common sense reasoning, algorithmic reasoning, and planning. Our findings indicate that simply scaling inference-time computation has limitations, as no single inference-time technique consistently performs well across all reasoning and planning tasks.

A Hierarchical Language Model For Interpretable Graph Reasoning

Large language models (LLMs) are being increasingly explored for graph tasks. Despite their remarkable success in text-based tasks, LLMs' capabilities in understanding explicit graph structures remain limited, particularly with large graphs. In this work, we introduce Hierarchical Language Model for Graph (HLM-G), which employs a two-block architecture to capture node-centric local information and interaction-centric global structure, effectively enhancing graph structure understanding abilities. The proposed scheme allows LLMs to address various graph queries with high efficacy, efficiency, and robustness, while reducing computational costs on large-scale graph tasks. Furthermore, we demonstrate the interpretability of our model using intrinsic attention weights and established explainers. Comprehensive evaluations across diverse graph reasoning and real-world tasks of node, link, and graph-levels highlight the superiority of our method, marking a significant advancement in the application of LLMs to graph understanding.