Enhancing Interpretability of Vertebrae Fracture Grading using Human-interpretable Prototypes

Vertebral fracture grading classifies the severity of vertebral fractures, which is a challenging task in medical imaging and has recently attracted Deep Learning (DL) models. Only a few works attempted to make such models human-interpretable despite the need for transparency and trustworthiness in critical use cases like DL-assisted medical diagnosis. Moreover, such models either rely on post-hoc methods or additional annotations. In this work, we propose a novel interpretable-by-design method, ProtoVerse, to find relevant sub-parts of vertebral fractures (prototypes) that reliably explain the model's decision in a human-understandable way. Specifically, we introduce a novel diversity-promoting loss to mitigate prototype repetitions in small datasets with intricate semantics. We have experimented with the VerSe'19 dataset and outperformed the existing prototype-based method. Further, our model provides superior interpretability against the post-hoc method. Importantly, expert radiologists validated the visual interpretability of our results, showing clinical applicability.

Grading Loss: A Fracture Grade-based Metric Loss for Vertebral Fracture Detection

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures have a severe impact on patients' overall well-being but are severely under-diagnosed. These fractures present themselves at various levels of severity measured using the Genant's grading scale. Insufficient annotated datasets, severe data-imbalance, and minor difference in appearances between fractured and healthy vertebrae make naive classification approaches result in poor discriminatory performance. Addressing this, we propose a representation learning-inspired approach for automated vertebral fracture detection, aimed at learning latent representations efficient for fracture detection. Building on state-of-art metric losses, we present a novel Grading Loss for learning representations that respect Genant's fracture grading scheme. On a publicly available spine dataset, the proposed loss function achieves a fracture detection F1 score of 81.5%, a 10% increase over a naive classification baseline.