Semantic scene descriptions as an objective of human vision

Interpreting the meaning of a visual scene requires not only identification of its constituent objects, but also a rich semantic characterization of object interrelations. Here, we study the neural mechanisms underlying visuo-semantic transformations by applying modern computational techniques to a large-scale 7T fMRI dataset of human brain responses elicited by complex natural scenes. Using semantic embeddings obtained by applying linguistic deep learning models to human-generated scene descriptions, we identify a widely distributed network of brain regions that encode semantic scene descriptions. Importantly, these semantic embeddings better explain activity in these regions than traditional object category labels. In addition, they are effective predictors of activity despite the fact that the participants did not actively engage in a semantic task, suggesting that visuo-semantic transformations are a default mode of vision. In support of this view, we then show that highly accurate reconstructions of scene captions can be directly linearly decoded from patterns of brain activity. Finally, a recurrent convolutional neural network trained on semantic embeddings further outperforms semantic embeddings in predicting brain activity, providing a mechanistic model of the brain's visuo-semantic transformations. Together, these experimental and computational results suggest that transforming visual input into rich semantic scene descriptions may be a central objective of the visual system, and that focusing efforts on this new objective may lead to improved models of visual information processing in the human brain.

The risk of bias in denoising methods

Experimental datasets are growing rapidly in size, scope, and detail, but the value of these datasets is limited by unwanted measurement noise. It is therefore tempting to apply analysis techniques that attempt to reduce noise and enhance signals of interest. In this paper, we draw attention to the possibility that denoising methods may introduce bias and lead to incorrect scientific inferences. To present our case, we first review the basic statistical concepts of bias and variance. Denoising techniques typically reduce variance observed across repeated measurements, but this can come at the expense of introducing bias to the average expected outcome. We then conduct three simple simulations that provide concrete examples of how bias may manifest in everyday situations. These simulations reveal several findings that may be surprising and counterintuitive: (i) different methods can be equally effective at reducing variance but some incur bias while others do not, (ii) identifying methods that better recover ground truth does not guarantee the absence of bias, (iii) bias can arise even if one has specific knowledge of properties of the signal of interest. We suggest that researchers should consider and possibly quantify bias before deploying denoising methods on important research data.

NeuroGen: activation optimized image synthesis for discovery neuroscience

Functional MRI (fMRI) is a powerful technique that has allowed us to characterize visual cortex responses to stimuli, yet such experiments are by nature constructed based on a priori hypotheses, limited to the set of images presented to the individual while they are in the scanner, are subject to noise in the observed brain responses, and may vary widely across individuals. In this work, we propose a novel computational strategy, which we call NeuroGen, to overcome these limitations and develop a powerful tool for human vision neuroscience discovery. NeuroGen combines an fMRI-trained neural encoding model of human vision with a deep generative network to synthesize images predicted to achieve a target pattern of macro-scale brain activation. We demonstrate that the reduction of noise that the encoding model provides, coupled with the generative network's ability to produce images of high fidelity, results in a robust discovery architecture for visual neuroscience. By using only a small number of synthetic images created by NeuroGen, we demonstrate that we can detect and amplify differences in regional and individual human brain response patterns to visual stimuli. We then verify that these discoveries are reflected in the several thousand observed image responses measured with fMRI. We further demonstrate that NeuroGen can create synthetic images predicted to achieve regional response patterns not achievable by the best-matching natural images. The NeuroGen framework extends the utility of brain encoding models and opens up a new avenue for exploring, and possibly precisely controlling, the human visual system.

Fractional ridge regression: a fast, interpretable reparameterization of ridge regression

Ridge regression (RR) is a regularization technique that penalizes the L2-norm of the coefficients in linear regression. One of the challenges of using RR is the need to set a hyperparameter ($\alpha$) that controls the amount of regularization. Cross-validation is typically used to select the best $\alpha$ from a set of candidates. However, efficient and appropriate selection of $\alpha$ can be challenging, particularly where large amounts of data are analyzed. Because the selected $\alpha$ depends on the scale of the data and predictors, it is not straightforwardly interpretable. Here, we propose to reparameterize RR in terms of the ratio $\gamma$ between the L2-norms of the regularized and unregularized coefficients. This approach, called fractional RR (FRR), has several benefits: the solutions obtained for different $\gamma$ are guaranteed to vary, guarding against wasted calculations, and automatically span the relevant range of regularization, avoiding the need for arduous manual exploration. We provide an algorithm to solve FRR, as well as open-source software implementations in Python and MATLAB (https://github.com/nrdg/fracridge). We show that the proposed method is fast and scalable for large-scale data problems, and delivers results that are straightforward to interpret and compare across models and datasets.