How To Segment in 3D Using 2D Models: Automated 3D Segmentation of Prostate Cancer Metastatic Lesions on PET Volumes Using Multi-Angle Maximum Intensity Projections and Diffusion Models

Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging provides a tremendously exciting frontier in visualization of prostate cancer (PCa) metastatic lesions. However, accurate segmentation of metastatic lesions is challenging due to low signal-to-noise ratios and variable sizes, shapes, and locations of the lesions. This study proposes a novel approach for automated segmentation of metastatic lesions in PSMA PET/CT 3D volumetric images using 2D denoising diffusion probabilistic models (DDPMs). Instead of 2D trans-axial slices or 3D volumes, the proposed approach segments the lesions on generated multi-angle maximum intensity projections (MA-MIPs) of the PSMA PET images, then obtains the final 3D segmentation masks from 3D ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction of 2D MA-MIPs segmentations. Our proposed method achieved superior performance compared to state-of-the-art 3D segmentation approaches in terms of accuracy and robustness in detecting and segmenting small metastatic PCa lesions. The proposed method has significant potential as a tool for quantitative analysis of metastatic burden in PCa patients.

Comprehensive Evaluation and Insights into the Use of Deep Neural Networks to Detect and Quantify Lymphoma Lesions in PET/CT Images

This study performs comprehensive evaluation of four neural network architectures (UNet, SegResNet, DynUNet, and SwinUNETR) for lymphoma lesion segmentation from PET/CT images. These networks were trained, validated, and tested on a diverse, multi-institutional dataset of 611 cases. Internal testing (88 cases; total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) range [0.52, 2300] ml) showed SegResNet as the top performer with a median Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.76 and median false positive volume (FPV) of 4.55 ml; all networks had a median false negative volume (FNV) of 0 ml. On the unseen external test set (145 cases with TMTV range: [0.10, 2480] ml), SegResNet achieved the best median DSC of 0.68 and FPV of 21.46 ml, while UNet had the best FNV of 0.41 ml. We assessed reproducibility of six lesion measures, calculated their prediction errors, and examined DSC performance in relation to these lesion measures, offering insights into segmentation accuracy and clinical relevance. Additionally, we introduced three lesion detection criteria, addressing the clinical need for identifying lesions, counting them, and segmenting based on metabolic characteristics. We also performed expert intra-observer variability analysis revealing the challenges in segmenting ``easy'' vs. ``hard'' cases, to assist in the development of more resilient segmentation algorithms. Finally, we performed inter-observer agreement assessment underscoring the importance of a standardized ground truth segmentation protocol involving multiple expert annotators. Code is available at: https://github.com/microsoft/lymphoma-segmentation-dnn

Semi-supervised learning towards automated segmentation of PET images with limited annotations: Application to lymphoma patients

The time-consuming task of manual segmentation challenges routine systematic quantification of disease burden. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) hold significant promise to reliably identify locations and boundaries of tumors from PET scans. We aimed to leverage the need for annotated data via semi-supervised approaches, with application to PET images of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL). We analyzed 18F-FDG PET images of 292 patients with PMBCL (n=104) and DLBCL (n=188) (n=232 for training and validation, and n=60 for external testing). We employed FCM and MS losses for training a 3D U-Net with different levels of supervision: i) fully supervised methods with labeled FCM (LFCM) as well as Unified focal and Dice loss functions, ii) unsupervised methods with Robust FCM (RFCM) and Mumford-Shah (MS) loss functions, and iii) Semi-supervised methods based on FCM (RFCM+LFCM), as well as MS loss in combination with supervised Dice loss (MS+Dice). Unified loss function yielded higher Dice score (mean +/- standard deviation (SD)) (0.73 +/- 0.03; 95% CI, 0.67-0.8) compared to Dice loss (p-value<0.01). Semi-supervised (RFCM+alpha*LFCM) with alpha=0.3 showed the best performance, with a Dice score of 0.69 +/- 0.03 (95% CI, 0.45-0.77) outperforming (MS+alpha*Dice) for any supervision level (any alpha) (p<0.01). The best performer among (MS+alpha*Dice) semi-supervised approaches with alpha=0.2 showed a Dice score of 0.60 +/- 0.08 (95% CI, 0.44-0.76) compared to another supervision level in this semi-supervised approach (p<0.01). Semi-supervised learning via FCM loss (RFCM+alpha*LFCM) showed improved performance compared to supervised approaches. Considering the time-consuming nature of expert manual delineations and intra-observer variabilities, semi-supervised approaches have significant potential for automated segmentation workflows.