Loss Gradient Gaussian Width based Generalization and Optimization Guarantees

Generalization and optimization guarantees on the population loss in machine learning often rely on uniform convergence based analysis, typically based on the Rademacher complexity of the predictors. The rich representation power of modern models has led to concerns about this approach. In this paper, we present generalization and optimization guarantees in terms of the complexity of the gradients, as measured by the Loss Gradient Gaussian Width (LGGW). First, we introduce generalization guarantees directly in terms of the LGGW under a flexible gradient domination condition, which we demonstrate to hold empirically for deep models. Second, we show that sample reuse in finite sum (stochastic) optimization does not make the empirical gradient deviate from the population gradient as long as the LGGW is small. Third, focusing on deep networks, we present results showing how to bound their LGGW under mild assumptions. In particular, we show that their LGGW can be bounded (a) by the $L_2$-norm of the loss Hessian eigenvalues, which has been empirically shown to be $\tilde{O}(1)$ for commonly used deep models; and (b) in terms of the Gaussian width of the featurizer, i.e., the output of the last-but-one layer. To our knowledge, our generalization and optimization guarantees in terms of LGGW are the first results of its kind, avoid the pitfalls of predictor Rademacher complexity based analysis, and hold considerable promise towards quantitatively tight bounds for deep models.

Differentially Private Post-Processing for Fair Regression

This paper describes a differentially private post-processing algorithm for learning fair regressors satisfying statistical parity, addressing privacy concerns of machine learning models trained on sensitive data, as well as fairness concerns of their potential to propagate historical biases. Our algorithm can be applied to post-process any given regressor to improve fairness by remapping its outputs. It consists of three steps: first, the output distributions are estimated privately via histogram density estimation and the Laplace mechanism, then their Wasserstein barycenter is computed, and the optimal transports to the barycenter are used for post-processing to satisfy fairness. We analyze the sample complexity of our algorithm and provide fairness guarantee, revealing a trade-off between the statistical bias and variance induced from the choice of the number of bins in the histogram, in which using less bins always favors fairness at the expense of error.