BiMind: A Dual-Head Reasoning Model with Attention-Geometry Adapter for Incorrect Information Detection

Incorrect information poses significant challenges by disrupting content veracity and integrity, yet most detection approaches struggle to jointly balance textual content verification with external knowledge modification under collapsed attention geometries. To address this issue, we propose a dual-head reasoning framework, BiMind, which disentangles content-internal reasoning from knowledge-augmented reasoning. In BiMind, we introduce three core innovations: (i) an attention geometry adapter that reshapes attention logits via token-conditioned offsets and mitigates attention collapse; (ii) a self-retrieval knowledge mechanism, which constructs an in-domain semantic memory through kNN retrieval and injects retrieved neighbors via feature-wise linear modulation; (iii) the uncertainty-aware fusion strategies, including entropy-gated fusion and a trainable agreement head, stabilized by a symmetric Kullback-Leibler agreement regularizer. To quantify the knowledge contributions, we define a novel metric, Value-of-eXperience (VoX), to measure instance-wise logit gains from knowledge-augmented reasoning. Experiment results on public datasets demonstrate that our BiMind model outperforms advanced detection approaches and provides interpretable diagnostics on when and why knowledge matters.

Automated Auditing of Hospital Discharge Summaries for Care Transitions

Incomplete or inconsistent discharge documentation is a primary driver of care fragmentation and avoidable readmissions. Despite its critical role in patient safety, auditing discharge summaries relies heavily on manual review and is difficult to scale. We propose an automated framework for large-scale auditing of discharge summaries using locally deployed Large Language Models (LLMs). Our approach operationalizes core transition-of-care requirements such as follow-up instructions, medication history and changes, patient information and clinical course, etc. into a structured validation checklist of questions based on DISCHARGED framework. Using adult inpatient summaries from the MIMIC-IV database, we utilize a privacy-preserving LLM to identify the presence, absence, or ambiguity of key documentation elements. This work demonstrates the feasibility of scalable, automated clinical auditing and provides a foundation for systematic quality improvement in electronic health record documentation.

ReasonScaffold: A Scaffolded Reasoning-based Annotation Protocol for Human-AI Co-Annotation

Human annotation is central to NLP evaluation, yet subjective tasks often exhibit substantial variability across annotators. While large language models (LLMs) can provide structured reasoning to support annotation, their influence on human annotation behavior remains underexplored. We introduce \textbf{ReasonScaffold}, a scaffolded reasoning annotation protocol that exposes LLM-generated explanations while withholding predicted labels. We study how reasoning affects human annotation behavior in a controlled setting, rather than evaluating annotation accuracy. Using a two-pass protocol inspired by Delphi-style revision, annotators first label instances independently and then revise their decisions after viewing model-generated reasoning. We evaluate the approach on sentiment classification and opinion detection tasks, analyzing changes in inter-annotator agreement and revision behavior. To quantify these effects, we introduce the Annotator Effort Proxy (AEP), a metric capturing the proportion of labels revised after exposure to reasoning. Our results show that exposure to reasoning is associated with increased agreement, along with minimal revision, suggesting that reasoning helps resolve ambiguous cases without inducing widespread changes. These findings provide insight into how reasoning explanations shape annotation consistency and highlight reasoning-based scaffolds as a practical mechanism for human--AI co-annotation workflows.

Evaluating Reasoning-Based Scaffolds for Human-AI Co-Annotation: The ReasonAlign Annotation Protocol

Human annotation is central to NLP evaluation, yet subjective tasks often exhibit substantial variability across annotators. While large language models (LLMs) can provide structured reasoning to support annotation, their influence on human annotation behavior remains unclear. We introduce ReasonAlign, a reasoning-based annotation scaffold that exposes LLM-generated explanations while withholding predicted labels. We frame this as a controlled study of how reasoning affects human annotation behavior, rather than a full evaluation of annotation accuracy. Using a two-pass protocol inspired by Delphi-style revision, annotators first label instances independently and then revise their decisions after viewing model-generated reasoning. We evaluate the approach on sentiment classification and opinion detection tasks, analyzing changes in inter-annotator agreement and revision behavior. To quantify these effects, we introduce the Annotator Effort Proxy (AEP), a metric capturing the proportion of labels revised after exposure to reasoning. Our results show that exposure to reasoning is associated with increased agreement alongside minimal revision, suggesting that reasoning primarily helps resolve ambiguous cases without inducing widespread changes. These findings provide insight into how reasoning explanations shape annotation consistency and highlight reasoning-based scaffolds as a practical mechanism for supporting human-AI annotation workflows.

The Psychology of Falsehood: A Human-Centric Survey of Misinformation Detection

Misinformation remains one of the most significant issues in the digital age. While automated fact-checking has emerged as a viable solution, most current systems are limited to evaluating factual accuracy. However, the detrimental effect of misinformation transcends simple falsehoods; it takes advantage of how individuals perceive, interpret, and emotionally react to information. This underscores the need to move beyond factuality and adopt more human-centered detection frameworks. In this survey, we explore the evolving interplay between traditional fact-checking approaches and psychological concepts such as cognitive biases, social dynamics, and emotional responses. By analyzing state-of-the-art misinformation detection systems through the lens of human psychology and behavior, we reveal critical limitations of current methods and identify opportunities for improvement. Additionally, we outline future research directions aimed at creating more robust and adaptive frameworks, such as neuro-behavioural models that integrate technological factors with the complexities of human cognition and social influence. These approaches offer promising pathways to more effectively detect and mitigate the societal harms of misinformation.

Enhancing In-Hospital Mortality Prediction Using Multi-Representational Learning with LLM-Generated Expert Summaries

In-hospital mortality (IHM) prediction for ICU patients is critical for timely interventions and efficient resource allocation. While structured physiological data provides quantitative insights, clinical notes offer unstructured, context-rich narratives. This study integrates these modalities with Large Language Model (LLM)-generated expert summaries to improve IHM prediction accuracy. Using the MIMIC-III database, we analyzed time-series physiological data and clinical notes from the first 48 hours of ICU admission. Clinical notes were concatenated chronologically for each patient and transformed into expert summaries using Med42-v2 70B. A multi-representational learning framework was developed to integrate these data sources, leveraging LLMs to enhance textual data while mitigating direct reliance on LLM predictions, which can introduce challenges in uncertainty quantification and interpretability. The proposed model achieved an AUPRC of 0.6156 (+36.41%) and an AUROC of 0.8955 (+7.64%) compared to a time-series-only baseline. Expert summaries outperformed clinical notes or time-series data alone, demonstrating the value of LLM-generated knowledge. Performance gains were consistent across demographic groups, with notable improvements in underrepresented populations, underscoring the framework's equitable application potential. By integrating LLM-generated summaries with structured and unstructured data, the framework captures complementary patient information, significantly improving predictive performance. This approach showcases the potential of LLMs to augment critical care prediction models, emphasizing the need for domain-specific validation and advanced integration strategies for broader clinical adoption.

LoDIP: Low light phase retrieval with deep image prior

Phase retrieval (PR) is a fundamental challenge in scientific imaging, enabling nanoscale techniques like coherent diffractive imaging (CDI). Imaging at low radiation doses becomes important in applications where samples are susceptible to radiation damage. However, most PR methods struggle in low dose scenario due to the presence of very high shot noise. Advancements in the optical data acquisition setup, exemplified by in-situ CDI, have shown potential for low-dose imaging. But these depend on a time series of measurements, rendering them unsuitable for single-image applications. Similarly, on the computational front, data-driven phase retrieval techniques are not readily adaptable to the single-image context. Deep learning based single-image methods, such as deep image prior, have been effective for various imaging tasks but have exhibited limited success when applied to PR. In this work, we propose LoDIP which combines the in-situ CDI setup with the power of implicit neural priors to tackle the problem of single-image low-dose phase retrieval. Quantitative evaluations demonstrate the superior performance of LoDIP on this task as well as applicability to real experimental scenarios.

Explain Variance of Prediction in Variational Time Series Models for Clinical Deterioration Prediction

Missingness and measurement frequency are two sides of the same coin. How frequent should we measure clinical variables and conduct laboratory tests? It depends on many factors such as the stability of patient conditions, diagnostic process, treatment plan and measurement costs. The utility of measurements varies disease by disease, patient by patient. In this study we propose a novel view of clinical variable measurement frequency from a predictive modeling perspective, namely the measurements of clinical variables reduce uncertainty in model predictions. To achieve this goal, we propose variance SHAP with variational time series models, an application of Shapley Additive Expanation(SHAP) algorithm to attribute epistemic prediction uncertainty. The prediction variance is estimated by sampling the conditional hidden space in variational models and can be approximated deterministically by delta's method. This approach works with variational time series models such as variational recurrent neural networks and variational transformers. Since SHAP values are additive, the variance SHAP of binary data imputation masks can be directly interpreted as the contribution to prediction variance by measurements. We tested our ideas on a public ICU dataset with deterioration prediction task and study the relation between variance SHAP and measurement time intervals.

A Kalman Filter Based Framework for Monitoring the Performance of In-Hospital Mortality Prediction Models Over Time

Unlike in a clinical trial, where researchers get to determine the least number of positive and negative samples required, or in a machine learning study where the size and the class distribution of the validation set is static and known, in a real-world scenario, there is little control over the size and distribution of incoming patients. As a result, when measured during different time periods, evaluation metrics like Area under the Receiver Operating Curve (AUCROC) and Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve(AUCPR) may not be directly comparable. Therefore, in this study, for binary classifiers running in a long time period, we proposed to adjust these performance metrics for sample size and class distribution, so that a fair comparison can be made between two time periods. Note that the number of samples and the class distribution, namely the ratio of positive samples, are two robustness factors which affect the variance of AUCROC. To better estimate the mean of performance metrics and understand the change of performance over time, we propose a Kalman filter based framework with extrapolated variance adjusted for the total number of samples and the number of positive samples during different time periods. The efficacy of this method is demonstrated first on a synthetic dataset and then retrospectively applied to a 2-days ahead in-hospital mortality prediction model for COVID-19 patients during 2021 and 2022. Further, we conclude that our prediction model is not significantly affected by the evolution of the disease, improved treatments and changes in hospital operational plans.

Which Modality should I use -- Text, Motif, or Image? : Understanding Graphs with Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) are revolutionizing various fields by leveraging large text corpora for context-aware intelligence. Due to the context size, however, encoding an entire graph with LLMs is fundamentally limited. This paper explores how to better integrate graph data with LLMs and presents a novel approach using various encoding modalities (e.g., text, image, and motif) and approximation of global connectivity of a graph using different prompting methods to enhance LLMs' effectiveness in handling complex graph structures. The study also introduces GraphTMI, a new benchmark for evaluating LLMs in graph structure analysis, focusing on factors such as homophily, motif presence, and graph difficulty. Key findings reveal that image modality, supported by advanced vision-language models like GPT-4V, is more effective than text in managing token limits while retaining critical information. The research also examines the influence of different factors on each encoding modality's performance. This study highlights the current limitations and charts future directions for LLMs in graph understanding and reasoning tasks.