CV-Probes: Studying the interplay of lexical and world knowledge in visually grounded verb understanding

This study investigates the ability of various vision-language (VL) models to ground context-dependent and non-context-dependent verb phrases. To do that, we introduce the CV-Probes dataset, designed explicitly for studying context understanding, containing image-caption pairs with context-dependent verbs (e.g., "beg") and non-context-dependent verbs (e.g., "sit"). We employ the MM-SHAP evaluation to assess the contribution of verb tokens towards model predictions. Our results indicate that VL models struggle to ground context-dependent verb phrases effectively. These findings highlight the challenges in training VL models to integrate context accurately, suggesting a need for improved methodologies in VL model training and evaluation.

Beyond Image-Text Matching: Verb Understanding in Multimodal Transformers Using Guided Masking

The dominant probing approaches rely on the zero-shot performance of image-text matching tasks to gain a finer-grained understanding of the representations learned by recent multimodal image-language transformer models. The evaluation is carried out on carefully curated datasets focusing on counting, relations, attributes, and others. This work introduces an alternative probing strategy called guided masking. The proposed approach ablates different modalities using masking and assesses the model's ability to predict the masked word with high accuracy. We focus on studying multimodal models that consider regions of interest (ROI) features obtained by object detectors as input tokens. We probe the understanding of verbs using guided masking on ViLBERT, LXMERT, UNITER, and VisualBERT and show that these models can predict the correct verb with high accuracy. This contrasts with previous conclusions drawn from image-text matching probing techniques that frequently fail in situations requiring verb understanding. The code for all experiments will be publicly available https://github.com/ivana-13/guided_masking.

In-Depth Look at Word Filling Societal Bias Measures

Many measures of societal bias in language models have been proposed in recent years. A popular approach is to use a set of word filling prompts to evaluate the behavior of the language models. In this work, we analyze the validity of two such measures -- StereoSet and CrowS-Pairs. We show that these measures produce unexpected and illogical results when appropriate control group samples are constructed. Based on this, we believe that they are problematic and using them in the future should be reconsidered. We propose a way forward with an improved testing protocol. Finally, we also introduce a new gender bias dataset for Slovak.