Energy-Based Preference Model Offers Better Offline Alignment than the Bradley-Terry Preference Model

Since the debut of DPO, it has been shown that aligning a target LLM with human preferences via the KL-constrained RLHF loss is mathematically equivalent to a special kind of reward modeling task. Concretely, the task requires: 1) using the target LLM to parameterize the reward model, and 2) tuning the reward model so that it has a 1:1 linear relationship with the true reward. However, we identify a significant issue: the DPO loss might have multiple minimizers, of which only one satisfies the required linearity condition. The problem arises from a well-known issue of the underlying Bradley-Terry preference model: it does not always have a unique maximum likelihood estimator (MLE). Consequently,the minimizer of the RLHF loss might be unattainable because it is merely one among many minimizers of the DPO loss. As a better alternative, we propose an energy-based model (EBM) that always has a unique MLE, inherently satisfying the linearity requirement. To approximate the MLE in practice, we propose a contrastive loss named Energy Preference Alignment (EPA), wherein each positive sample is contrasted against one or more strong negatives as well as many free weak negatives. Theoretical properties of our EBM enable the approximation error of EPA to almost surely vanish when a sufficient number of negatives are used. Empirically, we demonstrate that EPA consistently delivers better performance on open benchmarks compared to DPO, thereby showing the superiority of our EBM.

Uncertainty Sentence Sampling by Virtual Adversarial Perturbation

Active learning for sentence understanding attempts to reduce the annotation cost by identifying the most informative examples. Common methods for active learning use either uncertainty or diversity sampling in the pool-based scenario. In this work, to incorporate both predictive uncertainty and sample diversity, we propose Virtual Adversarial Perturbation for Active Learning (VAPAL) , an uncertainty-diversity combination framework, using virtual adversarial perturbation (Miyato et al., 2019) as model uncertainty representation. VAPAL consistently performs equally well or even better than the strong baselines on four sentence understanding datasets: AGNEWS, IMDB, PUBMED, and SST-2, offering a potential option for active learning on sentence understanding tasks.