Towards smart and adaptive agents for active sensing on edge devices

TinyML has made deploying deep learning models on low-power edge devices feasible, creating new opportunities for real-time perception in constrained environments. However, the adaptability of such deep learning methods remains limited to data drift adaptation, lacking broader capabilities that account for the environment's underlying dynamics and inherent uncertainty. Deep learning's scaling laws, which counterbalance this limitation by massively up-scaling data and model size, cannot be applied when deploying on the Edge, where deep learning limitations are further amplified as models are scaled down for deployment on resource-constrained devices. This paper presents a smart agentic system capable of performing on-device perception and planning, enabling active sensing on the edge. By incorporating active inference into our solution, our approach extends beyond deep learning capabilities, allowing the system to plan in dynamic environments while operating in real time with a modest total model size of 2.3 MB. We showcase our proposed system by creating and deploying a saccade agent connected to an IoT camera with pan and tilt capabilities on an NVIDIA Jetson embedded device. The saccade agent controls the camera's field of view following optimal policies derived from the active inference principles, simulating human-like saccadic motion for surveillance and robotics applications.

Multi-channel MR Reconstruction (MC-MRRec) Challenge -- Comparing Accelerated MR Reconstruction Models and Assessing Their Genereralizability to Datasets Collected with Different Coils

The 2020 Multi-channel Magnetic Resonance Reconstruction (MC-MRRec) Challenge had two primary goals: 1) compare different MR image reconstruction models on a large dataset and 2) assess the generalizability of these models to datasets acquired with a different number of receiver coils (i.e., multiple channels). The challenge had two tracks: Track 01 focused on assessing models trained and tested with 12-channel data. Track 02 focused on assessing models trained with 12-channel data and tested on both 12-channel and 32-channel data. While the challenge is ongoing, here we describe the first edition of the challenge and summarise submissions received prior to 5 September 2020. Track 01 had five baseline models and received four independent submissions. Track 02 had two baseline models and received two independent submissions. This manuscript provides relevant comparative information on the current state-of-the-art of MR reconstruction and highlights the challenges of obtaining generalizable models that are required prior to clinical adoption. Both challenge tracks remain open and will provide an objective performance assessment for future submissions. Subsequent editions of the challenge are proposed to investigate new concepts and strategies, such as the integration of potentially available longitudinal information during the MR reconstruction process. An outline of the proposed second edition of the challenge is presented in this manuscript.