Statements: Universal Information Extraction from Tables with Large Language Models for ESG KPIs

Environment, Social, and Governance (ESG) KPIs assess an organization's performance on issues such as climate change, greenhouse gas emissions, water consumption, waste management, human rights, diversity, and policies. ESG reports convey this valuable quantitative information through tables. Unfortunately, extracting this information is difficult due to high variability in the table structure as well as content. We propose Statements, a novel domain agnostic data structure for extracting quantitative facts and related information. We propose translating tables to statements as a new supervised deep-learning universal information extraction task. We introduce SemTabNet - a dataset of over 100K annotated tables. Investigating a family of T5-based Statement Extraction Models, our best model generates statements which are 82% similar to the ground-truth (compared to baseline of 21%). We demonstrate the advantages of statements by applying our model to over 2700 tables from ESG reports. The homogeneous nature of statements permits exploratory data analysis on expansive information found in large collections of ESG reports.

Uncertainty Quantification for Rule-Based Models

Rule-based classification models described in the language of logic directly predict boolean values, rather than modeling a probability and translating it into a prediction as done in statistical models. The vast majority of existing uncertainty quantification approaches rely on models providing continuous output not available to rule-based models. In this work, we propose an uncertainty quantification framework in the form of a meta-model that takes any binary classifier with binary output as a black box and estimates the prediction accuracy of that base model at a given input along with a level of confidence on that estimation. The confidence is based on how well that input region is explored and is designed to work in any OOD scenario. We demonstrate the usefulness of this uncertainty model by building an abstaining classifier powered by it and observing its performance in various scenarios.

Differentiable Rule Induction with Learned Relational Features

Rule-based decision models are attractive due to their interpretability. However, existing rule induction methods often results in long and consequently less interpretable set of rules. This problem can, in many cases, be attributed to the rule learner's lack of appropriately expressive vocabulary, i.e., relevant predicates. Most existing rule induction algorithms presume the availability of predicates used to represent the rules, naturally decoupling the predicate definition and the rule learning phases. In contrast, we propose the Relational Rule Network (RRN), a neural architecture that learns relational predicates that represent a linear relationship among attributes along with the rules that use them. This approach opens the door to increasing the expressiveness of induced decision models by coupling predicate learning directly with rule learning in an end to end differentiable fashion. On benchmark tasks, we show that these relational predicates are simple enough to retain interpretability, yet improve prediction accuracy and provide sets of rules that are more concise compared to state of the art rule induction algorithms.