Abstract:This work aims efficiently estimating the posterior distribution of kinetic parameters for dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) imaging given a measurement of time of activity curve. Considering the inherent information loss from parametric imaging to measurement space with the forward kinetic model, the inverse mapping is ambiguous. The conventional (but expensive) solution can be the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling, which is known to produce unbiased asymptotical estimation. We propose a deep-learning-based framework for efficient posterior estimation. Specifically, we counteract the information loss in the forward process by introducing latent variables. Then, we use a conditional variational autoencoder (CVAE) and optimize its evidence lower bound. The well-trained decoder is able to infer the posterior with a given measurement and the sampled latent variables following a simple multivariate Gaussian distribution. We validate our CVAE-based method using unbiased MCMC as the reference for low-dimensional data (a single brain region) with the simplified reference tissue model.
Abstract:Background: In medical imaging, images are usually treated as deterministic, while their uncertainties are largely underexplored. Purpose: This work aims at using deep learning to efficiently estimate posterior distributions of imaging parameters, which in turn can be used to derive the most probable parameters as well as their uncertainties. Methods: Our deep learning-based approaches are based on a variational Bayesian inference framework, which is implemented using two different deep neural networks based on conditional variational auto-encoder (CVAE), CVAE-dual-encoder and CVAE-dual-decoder. The conventional CVAE framework, i.e., CVAE-vanilla, can be regarded as a simplified case of these two neural networks. We applied these approaches to a simulation study of dynamic brain PET imaging using a reference region-based kinetic model. Results: In the simulation study, we estimated posterior distributions of PET kinetic parameters given a measurement of time-activity curve. Our proposed CVAE-dual-encoder and CVAE-dual-decoder yield results that are in good agreement with the asymptotically unbiased posterior distributions sampled by Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). The CVAE-vanilla can also be used for estimating posterior distributions, although it has an inferior performance to both CVAE-dual-encoder and CVAE-dual-decoder. Conclusions: We have evaluated the performance of our deep learning approaches for estimating posterior distributions in dynamic brain PET. Our deep learning approaches yield posterior distributions, which are in good agreement with unbiased distributions estimated by MCMC. All these neural networks have different characteristics and can be chosen by the user for specific applications. The proposed methods are general and can be adapted to other problems.