On the Role of Memory in Robust Opinion Dynamics

We investigate opinion dynamics in a fully-connected system, consisting of $n$ identical and anonymous agents, where one of the opinions (which is called correct) represents a piece of information to disseminate. In more detail, one source agent initially holds the correct opinion and remains with this opinion throughout the execution. The goal for non-source agents is to quickly agree on this correct opinion, and do that robustly, i.e., from any initial configuration. The system evolves in rounds. In each round, one agent chosen uniformly at random is activated: unless it is the source, the agent pulls the opinions of $\ell$ random agents and then updates its opinion according to some rule. We consider a restricted setting, in which agents have no memory and they only revise their opinions on the basis of those of the agents they currently sample. As restricted as it is, this setting encompasses very popular opinion dynamics, such as the voter model and best-of-$k$ majority rules. Qualitatively speaking, we show that lack of memory prevents efficient convergence. Specifically, we prove that no dynamics can achieve correct convergence in an expected number of steps that is sub-quadratic in $n$, even under a strong version of the model in which activated agents have complete access to the current configuration of the entire system, i.e., the case $\ell=n$. Conversely, we prove that the simple voter model (in which $\ell=1$) correctly solves the problem, while almost matching the aforementioned lower bound. These results suggest that, in contrast to symmetric consensus problems (that do not involve a notion of correct opinion), fast convergence on the correct opinion using stochastic opinion dynamics may indeed require the use of memory. This insight may reflect on natural information dissemination processes that rely on a few knowledgeable individuals.

On the Multidimensional Random Subset Sum Problem

In the Random Subset Sum Problem, given $n$ i.i.d. random variables $X_1, ..., X_n$, we wish to approximate any point $z \in [-1,1]$ as the sum of a suitable subset $X_{i_1(z)}, ..., X_{i_s(z)}$ of them, up to error $\varepsilon$. Despite its simple statement, this problem is of fundamental interest to both theoretical computer science and statistical mechanics. More recently, it gained renewed attention for its implications in the theory of Artificial Neural Networks. An obvious multidimensional generalisation of the problem is to consider $n$ i.i.d.\ $d$-dimensional random vectors, with the objective of approximating every point $\mathbf{z} \in [-1,1]^d$. Rather surprisingly, after Lueker's 1998 proof that, in the one-dimensional setting, $n=O(\log \frac 1\varepsilon)$ samples guarantee the approximation property with high probability, little progress has been made on achieving the above generalisation. In this work, we prove that, in $d$ dimensions, $n = O(d^3\log \frac 1\varepsilon \cdot (\log \frac 1\varepsilon + \log d))$ samples suffice for the approximation property to hold with high probability. As an application highlighting the potential interest of this result, we prove that a recently proposed neural network model exhibits \emph{universality}: with high probability, the model can approximate any neural network within a polynomial overhead in the number of parameters.

Biological Random Walks: integrating heterogeneous data in disease gene prioritization

This work proposes a unified framework to leverage biological information in network propagation-based gene prioritization algorithms. Preliminary results on breast cancer data show significant improvements over state-of-the-art baselines, such as the prioritization of genes that are not identified as potential candidates by interactome-based algorithms, but that appear to be involved in/or potentially related to breast cancer, according to a functional analysis based on recent literature.

Principal Fairness: \\ Removing Bias via Projections

Reducing hidden bias in the data and ensuring fairness in algorithmic data analysis has recently received significant attention. We complement several recent papers in this line of research by introducing a general method to reduce bias in the data through random projections in a ``fair'' subspace. We apply this method to densest subgraph and $k$-means. For densest subgraph, our approach based on fair projections allows to recover both theoretically and empirically an almost optimal, fair, dense subgraph hidden in the input data. We also show that, under the small set expansion hypothesis, approximating this problem beyond a factor of $2$ is NP-hard and we show a polynomial time algorithm with a matching approximation bound. We further apply our method to $k$-means. In a previous paper, Chierichetti et al.~[NIPS 2017] showed that problems such as $k$-means can be approximated up to a constant factor while ensuring that none of two protected class (e.g., gender, ethnicity) is disparately impacted. We show that fair projections generalize the concept of fairlet introduced by Chierichietti et al. to any number of protected attributes and improve empirically the quality of the resulting clustering. We also present the first constant-factor approximation for an arbitrary number of protected attributes thus settling an open problem recently addressed in several works.