Abstract:In the problem of cache-aided multiuser private information retrieval (MuPIR), a set of $K_{\rm u}$ cache-equipped users wish to privately download a set of messages from $N$ distributed databases each holding a library of $K$ messages. The system works in two phases: {\it cache placement (prefetching) phase} in which the users fill up their cache memory, and {\it private delivery phase} in which the users' demands are revealed and they download an answer from each database so that the their desired messages can be recovered while each individual database learns nothing about the identities of the requested messages. The goal is to design the placement and the private delivery phases such that the \emph{load}, which is defined as the total number of downloaded bits normalized by the message size, is minimized given any user memory size. This paper considers the MuPIR problem with two messages, arbitrary number of users and databases where uncoded prefetching is assumed, i.e., the users directly copy some bits from the library as their cached contents. We propose a novel MuPIR scheme inspired by the Maddah-Ali and Niesen (MAN) coded caching scheme. The proposed scheme achieves lower load than any existing schemes, especially the product design (PD), and is shown to be optimal within a factor of $8$ in general and exactly optimal at very high or low memory regime.
Abstract:In the robust secure aggregation problem, a server wishes to learn and only learn the sum of the inputs of a number of users while some users may drop out (i.e., may not respond). The identity of the dropped users is not known a priori and the server needs to securely recover the sum of the remaining surviving users. We consider the following minimal two-round model of secure aggregation. Over the first round, any set of no fewer than $U$ users out of $K$ users respond to the server and the server wants to learn the sum of the inputs of all responding users. The remaining users are viewed as dropped. Over the second round, any set of no fewer than $U$ users of the surviving users respond (i.e., dropouts are still possible over the second round) and from the information obtained from the surviving users over the two rounds, the server can decode the desired sum. The security constraint is that even if the server colludes with any $T$ users and the messages from the dropped users are received by the server (e.g., delayed packets), the server is not able to infer any additional information beyond the sum in the information theoretic sense. For this information theoretic secure aggregation problem, we characterize the optimal communication cost. When $U \leq T$, secure aggregation is not feasible, and when $U > T$, to securely compute one symbol of the sum, the minimum number of symbols sent from each user to the server is $1$ over the first round, and $1/(U-T)$ over the second round.