RECAP-KG: Mining Knowledge Graphs from Raw GP Notes for Remote COVID-19 Assessment in Primary Care

Clinical decision-making is a fundamental stage in delivering appropriate care to patients. In recent years several decision-making systems designed to aid the clinician in this process have been developed. However, technical solutions currently in use are based on simple regression models and are only able to take into account simple pre-defined multiple-choice features, such as patient age, pre-existing conditions, smoker status, etc. One particular source of patient data, that available decision-making systems are incapable of processing is the collection of patient consultation GP notes. These contain crucial signs and symptoms - the information used by clinicians in order to make a final decision and direct the patient to the appropriate care. Extracting information from GP notes is a technically challenging problem, as they tend to include abbreviations, typos, and incomplete sentences. This paper addresses this open challenge. We present a framework that performs knowledge graph construction from raw GP medical notes written during or after patient consultations. By relying on support phrases mined from the SNOMED ontology, as well as predefined supported facts from values used in the RECAP (REmote COVID-19 Assessment in Primary Care) patient risk prediction tool, our graph generative framework is able to extract structured knowledge graphs from the highly unstructured and inconsistent format that consultation notes are written in. Our knowledge graphs include information about existing patient symptoms, their duration, and their severity. We apply our framework to consultation notes of COVID-19 patients in the UK COVID-19 Clinical Assesment Servcie (CCAS) patient dataset. We provide a quantitative evaluation of the performance of our framework, demonstrating that our approach has better accuracy than traditional NLP methods when answering questions about patients.

Combining Experts' Causal Judgments

Consider a policymaker who wants to decide which intervention to perform in order to change a currently undesirable situation. The policymaker has at her disposal a team of experts, each with their own understanding of the causal dependencies between different factors contributing to the outcome. The policymaker has varying degrees of confidence in the experts' opinions. She wants to combine their opinions in order to decide on the most effective intervention. We formally define the notion of an effective intervention, and then consider how experts' causal judgments can be combined in order to determine the most effective intervention. We define a notion of two causal models being \emph{compatible}, and show how compatible causal models can be merged. We then use it as the basis for combining experts' causal judgments. We also provide a definition of decomposition for causal models to cater for cases when models are incompatible. We illustrate our approach on a number of real-life examples.

Learning Neural Search Policies for Classical Planning

Heuristic forward search is currently the dominant paradigm in classical planning. Forward search algorithms typically rely on a single, relatively simple variation of best-first search and remain fixed throughout the process of solving a planning problem. Existing work combining multiple search techniques usually aims at supporting best-first search with an additional exploratory mechanism, triggered using a handcrafted criterion. A notable exception is very recent work which combines various search techniques using a trainable policy. It is, however, confined to a discrete action space comprising several fixed subroutines. In this paper, we introduce a parametrized search algorithm template which combines various search techniques within a single routine. The template's parameter space defines an infinite space of search algorithms, including, among others, BFS, local and random search. We further introduce a neural architecture for designating the values of the search parameters given the state of the search. This enables expressing neural search policies that change the values of the parameters as the search progresses. The policies can be learned automatically, with the objective of maximizing the planner's performance on a given distribution of planning problems. We consider a training setting based on a stochastic optimization algorithm known as the cross-entropy method (CEM). Experimental evaluation of our approach shows that it is capable of finding effective distribution-specific search policies, outperforming the relevant baselines.

Learning Classical Planning Strategies with Policy Gradient

A common paradigm in classical planning is heuristic forward search. Forward search planners often rely on relatively simple best-first search algorithm, which remains fixed throughout the search process. In this paper, we introduce a novel search framework capable of alternating between several forward search approaches while solving a particular planning problem. Selection of the approach is performed using a trainable stochastic policy. This enables tailoring the search strategy to a particular distribution of planning problems and a selected performance metric, such as the IPC score or running time. We construct a strategy space using five search algorithms and a two-dimensional representation of the planner's state. Strategies are then trained on randomly generated planning problems using policy gradient. Experimental results show that the learner is able to discover domain-specific search strategies, thus improving the planner's performance with respect to the chosen metric.

Towards learning domain-independent planning heuristics

Automated planning remains one of the most general paradigms in Artificial Intelligence, providing means of solving problems coming from a wide variety of domains. One of the key factors restricting the applicability of planning is its computational complexity resulting from exponentially large search spaces. Heuristic approaches are necessary to solve all but the simplest problems. In this work, we explore the possibility of obtaining domain-independent heuristic functions using machine learning. This is a part of a wider research program whose objective is to improve practical applicability of planning in systems for which the planning domains evolve at run time. The challenge is therefore the learning of (corrections of) domain-independent heuristics that can be reused across different planning domains.