UnPaSt: unsupervised patient stratification by differentially expressed biclusters in omics data

Most complex diseases, including cancer and non-malignant diseases like asthma, have distinct molecular subtypes that require distinct clinical approaches. However, existing computational patient stratification methods have been benchmarked almost exclusively on cancer omics data and only perform well when mutually exclusive subtypes can be characterized by many biomarkers. Here, we contribute with a massive evaluation attempt, quantitatively exploring the power of 22 unsupervised patient stratification methods using both, simulated and real transcriptome data. From this experience, we developed UnPaSt (https://apps.cosy.bio/unpast/) optimizing unsupervised patient stratification, working even with only a limited number of subtype-predictive biomarkers. We evaluated all 23 methods on real-world breast cancer and asthma transcriptomics data. Although many methods reliably detected major breast cancer subtypes, only few identified Th2-high asthma, and UnPaSt significantly outperformed its closest competitors in both test datasets. Essentially, we showed that UnPaSt can detect many biologically insightful and reproducible patterns in omic datasets.

Privacy-Preserving Multi-Center Differential Protein Abundance Analysis with FedProt

Quantitative mass spectrometry has revolutionized proteomics by enabling simultaneous quantification of thousands of proteins. Pooling patient-derived data from multiple institutions enhances statistical power but raises significant privacy concerns. Here we introduce FedProt, the first privacy-preserving tool for collaborative differential protein abundance analysis of distributed data, which utilizes federated learning and additive secret sharing. In the absence of a multicenter patient-derived dataset for evaluation, we created two, one at five centers from LFQ E.coli experiments and one at three centers from TMT human serum. Evaluations using these datasets confirm that FedProt achieves accuracy equivalent to DEqMS applied to pooled data, with completely negligible absolute differences no greater than $\text{$4 \times 10^{-12}$}$. In contrast, -log10(p-values) computed by the most accurate meta-analysis methods diverged from the centralized analysis results by up to 25-27. FedProt is available as a web tool with detailed documentation as a FeatureCloud App.