The Machine Vision Iceberg Explained: Advancing Dynamic Testing by Considering Holistic Environmental Circumstances

Are we heading for an iceberg with the current testing of machine vision? This work delves into the landscape of Machine Vision (MV) testing, which is heavily required in Highly Automated Driving (HAD) systems. Utilizing the metaphorical notion of navigating towards an iceberg, we discuss the potential shortcomings concealed within current testing strategies. We emphasize the urgent need for a deeper understanding of how to deal with the opaque functions of MV in development processes. As overlooked considerations can cost lives. Our main contribution is the hierarchical level model, which we call Granularity Grades. The model encourages a refined exploration of the multi-scaled depths of understanding about the circumstances of environments in which MV is intended to operate. This model aims to provide a holistic overview of all entities that may impact MV functions, ranging from relations of individual entities like object attributes to entire environmental scenes. The application of our model delivers a structured exploration of entities in a specific domain, their relationships and assigning results of a MV-under-test to construct an entity-relationship graph. Through clustering patterns of relations in the graph general MV deficits are arguable. In Summary, our work contributes to a more nuanced and systematized identification of deficits of a MV test object in correlation to holistic circumstances in HAD operating domains.

1001 Ways of Scenario Generation for Testing of Self-driving Cars: A Survey

Scenario generation is one of the essential steps in scenario-based testing and, therefore, a significant part of the verification and validation of driver assistance functions and autonomous driving systems. However, the term scenario generation is used for many different methods, e.g., extraction of scenarios from naturalistic driving data or variation of scenario parameters. This survey aims to give a systematic overview of different approaches, establish different categories of scenario acquisition and generation, and show that each group of methods has typical input and output types. It shows that although the term is often used throughout literature, the evaluated methods use different inputs and the resulting scenarios differ in abstraction level and from a systematical point of view. Additionally, recent research and literature examples are given to underline this categorization.