Abstract:Many remote sensing applications employ masking of pixels in satellite imagery for subsequent measurements. For example, estimating water quality variables, such as Suspended Sediment Concentration (SSC) requires isolating pixels depicting water bodies unaffected by clouds, their shadows, terrain shadows, and snow and ice formation. A significant bottleneck is the reliance on a variety of data products (e.g., satellite imagery, elevation maps), and a lack of precision in individual steps affecting estimation accuracy. We propose to improve both the accuracy and computational efficiency of masking by developing a system that predicts all required masks from Harmonized Landsat and Sentinel (HLS) imagery. Our model employs multi-tasking to share computation and enable higher accuracy across tasks. We experiment with recent advances in deep network architectures and show that masking models can benefit from these, especially when combined with pre-training on large satellite imagery datasets. We present a collection of models offering different speed/accuracy trade-offs for masking. MobileNet variants are the fastest, and perform competitively with larger architectures. Transformer-based architectures are the slowest, but benefit the most from pre-training on large satellite imagery datasets. Our models provide a 9% F1 score improvement compared to previous work on water pixel identification. When integrated with an SSC estimation system, our models result in a 30x speedup while reducing estimation error by 2.64 mg/L, allowing for global-scale analysis. We also evaluate our model on a recently proposed cloud and cloud shadow estimation benchmark, where we outperform the current state-of-the-art model by at least 6% in F1 score.
Abstract:Modeling and visualizing relationships between tasks or datasets is an important step towards solving various meta-tasks such as dataset discovery, multi-tasking, and transfer learning. However, many relationships, such as containment and transferability, are naturally asymmetric and current approaches for representation and visualization (e.g., t-SNE) do not readily support this. We propose Task2Box, an approach to represent tasks using box embeddings -- axis-aligned hyperrectangles in low dimensional spaces -- that can capture asymmetric relationships between them through volumetric overlaps. We show that Task2Box accurately predicts unseen hierarchical relationships between nodes in ImageNet and iNaturalist datasets, as well as transferability between tasks in the Taskonomy benchmark. We also show that box embeddings estimated from task representations (e.g., CLIP, Task2Vec, or attribute based) can be used to predict relationships between unseen tasks more accurately than classifiers trained on the same representations, as well as handcrafted asymmetric distances (e.g., KL divergence). This suggests that low-dimensional box embeddings can effectively capture these task relationships and have the added advantage of being interpretable. We use the approach to visualize relationships among publicly available image classification datasets on popular dataset hosting platform called Hugging Face.
Abstract:We present a set of metrics that utilize vision priors to effectively assess the performance of saliency methods on image classification tasks. To understand behavior in deep learning models, many methods provide visual saliency maps emphasizing image regions that most contribute to a model prediction. However, there is limited work on analyzing the reliability of saliency methods in explaining model decisions. We propose the metric COnsistency-SEnsitivity (COSE) that quantifies the equivariant and invariant properties of visual model explanations using simple data augmentations. Through our metrics, we show that although saliency methods are thought to be architecture-independent, most methods could better explain transformer-based models over convolutional-based models. In addition, GradCAM was found to outperform other methods in terms of COSE but was shown to have limitations such as lack of variability for fine-grained datasets. The duality between consistency and sensitivity allow the analysis of saliency methods from different angles. Ultimately, we find that it is important to balance these two metrics for a saliency map to faithfully show model behavior.