Responsible AI for Earth Observation

The convergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and Earth observation (EO) technologies has brought geoscience and remote sensing into an era of unparalleled capabilities. AI's transformative impact on data analysis, particularly derived from EO platforms, holds great promise in addressing global challenges such as environmental monitoring, disaster response and climate change analysis. However, the rapid integration of AI necessitates a careful examination of the responsible dimensions inherent in its application within these domains. In this paper, we represent a pioneering effort to systematically define the intersection of AI and EO, with a central focus on responsible AI practices. Specifically, we identify several critical components guiding this exploration from both academia and industry perspectives within the EO field: AI and EO for social good, mitigating unfair biases, AI security in EO, geo-privacy and privacy-preserving measures, as well as maintaining scientific excellence, open data, and guiding AI usage based on ethical principles. Furthermore, the paper explores potential opportunities and emerging trends, providing valuable insights for future research endeavors.

Taking it further: leveraging pseudo labels for field delineation across label-scarce smallholder regions

Transfer learning allows for resource-efficient geographic transfer of pre-trained field delineation models. However, the scarcity of labeled data for complex and dynamic smallholder landscapes, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa, remains a major bottleneck for large-area field delineation. This study explores opportunities of using sparse field delineation pseudo labels for fine-tuning models across geographies and sensor characteristics. We build on a FracTAL ResUNet trained for crop field delineation in India (median field size of 0.24 ha) and use this pre-trained model to generate pseudo labels in Mozambique (median field size of 0.06 ha). We designed multiple pseudo label selection strategies and compared the quantities, area properties, seasonal distribution, and spatial agreement of the pseudo labels against human-annotated training labels (n = 1,512). We then used the human-annotated labels and the pseudo labels for model fine-tuning and compared predictions against human field annotations (n = 2,199). Our results indicate i) a good baseline performance of the pre-trained model in both field delineation and field size estimation, and ii) the added value of regional fine-tuning with performance improvements in nearly all experiments. Moreover, we found iii) substantial performance increases when using only pseudo labels (up to 77% of the IoU increases and 68% of the RMSE decreases obtained by human labels), and iv) additional performance increases when complementing human annotations with pseudo labels. Pseudo labels can be efficiently generated at scale and thus facilitate domain adaptation in label-scarce settings. The workflow presented here is a stepping stone for overcoming the persisting data gaps in heterogeneous smallholder agriculture of Sub-Saharan Africa, where labels are commonly scarce.