Abstract:To investigate how the auditory system processes natural speech, models have been created to relate the electroencephalography (EEG) signal of a person listening to speech to various representations of the speech. Mainly the speech envelope has been used, but also phonetic representations. We investigated to which degree of granularity phonetic representations can be related to the EEG signal. We used recorded EEG signals from 105 subjects while they listened to fairy tale stories. We utilized speech representations, including onset of any phone, vowel-consonant onsets, broad phonetic class (BPC) onsets, and narrow phonetic class (NPC) onsets, and related them to EEG using forward modeling and match-mismatch tasks. In forward modeling, we used a linear model to predict EEG from speech representations. In the match-mismatch task, we trained a long short term memory (LSTM) based model to determine which of two candidate speech segments matches with a given EEG segment. Our results show that vowel-consonant onsets outperform onsets of any phone in both tasks, which suggests that neural tracking of the vowel vs. consonant exists in the EEG to some degree. We also observed that vowel (syllable nucleus) onsets are better related to EEG compared to syllable onsets. Finally, our findings suggest that neural tracking previously thought to be associated with broad phonetic classes might actually originate from vowel-consonant onsets rather than the differentiation between different phonetic classes.
Abstract:Objective. When a person listens to continuous speech, a corresponding response is elicited in the brain and can be recorded using electroencephalography (EEG). Linear models are presently used to relate the EEG recording to the corresponding speech signal. The ability of linear models to find a mapping between these two signals is used as a measure of neural tracking of speech. Such models are limited as they assume linearity in the EEG-speech relationship, which omits the nonlinear dynamics of the brain. As an alternative, deep learning models have recently been used to relate EEG to continuous speech, especially in auditory attention decoding (AAD) and single-speech-source paradigms. Approach. This paper reviews and comments on deep-learning-based studies that relate EEG to continuous speech in AAD and single-speech-source paradigms. We point out recurrent methodological pitfalls and the need for a standard benchmark of model analysis. Main results. We gathered 28 studies. The main methodological issues we found are biased cross-validations, data leakage leading to over-fitted models, or disproportionate data size compared to the model's complexity. In addition, we address requirements for a standard benchmark model analysis, such as public datasets, common evaluation metrics, and good practices for the match-mismatch task. Significance. We are the first to present a review paper summarizing the main deep-learning-based studies that relate EEG to speech while addressing methodological pitfalls and important considerations for this newly expanding field. Our study is particularly relevant given the growing application of deep learning in EEG-speech decoding.
Abstract:Decoding the speech signal that a person is listening to from the human brain via electroencephalography (EEG) can help us understand how our auditory system works. Linear models have been used to reconstruct the EEG from speech or vice versa. Recently, Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) such as Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) based architectures have outperformed linear models in modeling the relation between EEG and speech. Before attempting to use these models in real-world applications such as hearing tests or (second) language comprehension assessment we need to know what level of speech information is being utilized by these models. In this study, we aim to analyze the performance of an LSTM-based model using different levels of speech features. The task of the model is to determine which of two given speech segments is matched with the recorded EEG. We used low- and high-level speech features including: envelope, mel spectrogram, voice activity, phoneme identity, and word embedding. Our results suggest that the model exploits information about silences, intensity, and broad phonetic classes from the EEG. Furthermore, the mel spectrogram, which contains all this information, yields the highest accuracy (84%) among all the features.
Abstract:Objective: Currently, only behavioral speech understanding tests are available, which require active participation of the person. As this is infeasible for certain populations, an objective measure of speech intelligibility is required. Recently, brain imaging data has been used to establish a relationship between stimulus and brain response. Linear models have been successfully linked to speech intelligibility but require per-subject training. We present a deep-learning-based model incorporating dilated convolutions that can be used to predict speech intelligibility without subject-specific (re)training. Methods: We evaluated the performance of the model as a function of input segment length, EEG frequency band and receptive field size while comparing it to a baseline model. Next, we evaluated performance on held-out data and finetuning. Finally, we established a link between the accuracy of our model and the state-of-the-art behavioral MATRIX test. Results: The model significantly outperformed the baseline for every input segment length (p$\leq10^{-9}$), for all EEG frequency bands except the theta band (p$\leq0.001$) and for receptive field sizes larger than 125 ms (p$\leq0.05$). Additionally, finetuning significantly increased the accuracy (p$\leq0.05$) on a held-out dataset. Finally, a significant correlation (r=0.59, p=0.0154) was found between the speech reception threshold estimated using the behavioral MATRIX test and our objective method. Conclusion: Our proposed dilated convolutional model can be used as a proxy for speech intelligibility. Significance: Our method is the first to predict the speech reception threshold from EEG for unseen subjects, contributing to objective measures of speech intelligibility.