Adaptive Sampling for Private Worst-Case Group Optimization

Models trained by minimizing the average loss often fail to be accurate on small or hard-to-learn groups of the data. Various methods address this issue by optimizing a weighted objective that focuses on the worst-performing groups. However, this approach becomes problematic when learning with differential privacy, as unequal data weighting can result in inhomogeneous privacy guarantees, in particular weaker privacy for minority groups. In this work, we introduce a new algorithm for differentially private worst-case group optimization called ASC (Adaptively Sampled and Clipped Worst-case Group Optimization). It adaptively controls both the sampling rate and the clipping threshold of each group. Thereby, it allows for harder-to-learn groups to be sampled more often while ensuring consistent privacy guarantees across all groups. Comparing ASC to prior work, we show that it results in lower-variance gradients, tighter privacy guarantees, and substantially higher worst-case group accuracy without sacrificing overall average accuracy.

Demystifying amortized causal discovery with transformers

Supervised learning approaches for causal discovery from observational data often achieve competitive performance despite seemingly avoiding explicit assumptions that traditional methods make for identifiability. In this work, we investigate CSIvA (Ke et al., 2023), a transformer-based model promising to train on synthetic data and transfer to real data. First, we bridge the gap with existing identifiability theory and show that constraints on the training data distribution implicitly define a prior on the test observations. Consistent with classical approaches, good performance is achieved when we have a good prior on the test data, and the underlying model is identifiable. At the same time, we find new trade-offs. Training on datasets generated from different classes of causal models, unambiguously identifiable in isolation, improves the test generalization. Performance is still guaranteed, as the ambiguous cases resulting from the mixture of identifiable causal models are unlikely to occur (which we formally prove). Overall, our study finds that amortized causal discovery still needs to obey identifiability theory, but it also differs from classical methods in how the assumptions are formulated, trading more reliance on assumptions on the noise type for fewer hypotheses on the mechanisms.

PriorCVAE: scalable MCMC parameter inference with Bayesian deep generative modelling

In applied fields where the speed of inference and model flexibility are crucial, the use of Bayesian inference for models with a stochastic process as their prior, e.g. Gaussian processes (GPs) is ubiquitous. Recent literature has demonstrated that the computational bottleneck caused by GP priors or their finite realizations can be encoded using deep generative models such as variational autoencoders (VAEs), and the learned generators can then be used instead of the original priors during Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) inference in a drop-in manner. While this approach enables fast and highly efficient inference, it loses information about the stochastic process hyperparameters, and, as a consequence, makes inference over hyperparameters impossible and the learned priors indistinct. We propose to resolve this issue and disentangle the learned priors by conditioning the VAE on stochastic process hyperparameters. This way, the hyperparameters are encoded alongside GP realisations and can be explicitly estimated at the inference stage. We believe that the new method, termed PriorCVAE, will be a useful tool among approximate inference approaches and has the potential to have a large impact on spatial and spatiotemporal inference in crucial real-life applications. Code showcasing PriorCVAE can be found on GitHub: https://github.com/elizavetasemenova/PriorCVAE