Enhancing Interaction Modeling with Agent Selection and Physical Methods for Trajectory Prediction

In this study, we address the limitations inherent in most existing vehicle trajectory prediction methodologies that indiscriminately incorporate all agents within a predetermined proximity when accounting for inter-agent interactions. These approaches commonly employ attention-based architecture or graph neural networks for encoding interactions, which introduces three challenges: (i) The indiscriminate selection of all nearby agents substantially escalates the computational demands of the model, particularly in those interaction-rich scenarios. (ii) Moreover, the simplistic feature extraction of current time agents falls short of adequately capturing the nuanced dynamics of interactions. (iii) Compounded by the inherently low interpretability of attention mechanism and graph neural networks, there is a propensity for the model to allocate unreliable correlation coefficients to certain agents, adversely impacting the accuracy of trajectory predictions. To mitigate these issues, we introduce ASPILin, a novel approach that enhances the selection of interacting agents by considering their current and future lanes, extending this consideration across all historical frames. Utilizing the states of the agents, we estimate the nearest future distance between agents and the time needed to reach this distance. Then, combine these with their current distances to derive a physical correlation coefficient to encode interactions. Experiments conducted on popular trajectory prediction datasets demonstrate that our method is efficient and straightforward, outperforming other state-of-the-art methods.

Continental-scale streamflow modeling of basins with reservoirs: a demonstration of effectiveness and a delineation of challenges

A large fraction of major waterways have dams influencing streamflow, which must be accounted for in large-scale hydrologic modeling. However, daily streamflow prediction for basins with dams is challenging for various modeling approaches, especially at large scales. Here we took a divide-and-conquer approach to examine which types of basins could be well represented by a long short-term memory (LSTM) deep learning model using only readily-available information. We analyzed data from 3557 basins (83% dammed) over the contiguous United States and noted strong impacts of reservoir purposes, capacity-to-runoff ratio (dor), and diversion on streamflow on streamflow modeling. Surprisingly, while the LSTM model trained on a widely-used reference-basin dataset performed poorly for more non-reference basins, the model trained on the whole dataset presented a median test Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE) of 0.74, reaching benchmark-level performance. The zero-dor, small-dor, and large-dor basins were found to have distinct behaviors, so migrating models between categories yielded catastrophic results. However, training with pooled data from different sets yielded optimal median NSEs of 0.73, 0.78, and 0.71 for these groups, respectively, showing noticeable advantages over existing models. These results support a coherent, mixed modeling strategy where smaller dams are modeled as part of rainfall-runoff processes, but dammed basins must not be treated as reference ones and must be included in the training set; then, large-dor reservoirs can be represented explicitly and future work should examine modeling reservoirs for fire protection and irrigation, followed by those for hydroelectric power generation, and flood control, etc.