EchoTracker: Advancing Myocardial Point Tracking in Echocardiography

Tissue tracking in echocardiography is challenging due to the complex cardiac motion and the inherent nature of ultrasound acquisitions. Although optical flow methods are considered state-of-the-art (SOTA), they struggle with long-range tracking, noise occlusions, and drift throughout the cardiac cycle. Recently, novel learning-based point tracking techniques have been introduced to tackle some of these issues. In this paper, we build upon these techniques and introduce EchoTracker, a two-fold coarse-to-fine model that facilitates the tracking of queried points on a tissue surface across ultrasound image sequences. The architecture contains a preliminary coarse initialization of the trajectories, followed by reinforcement iterations based on fine-grained appearance changes. It is efficient, light, and can run on mid-range GPUs. Experiments demonstrate that the model outperforms SOTA methods, with an average position accuracy of 67% and a median trajectory error of 2.86 pixels. Furthermore, we show a relative improvement of 25% when using our model to calculate the global longitudinal strain (GLS) in a clinical test-retest dataset compared to other methods. This implies that learning-based point tracking can potentially improve performance and yield a higher diagnostic and prognostic value for clinical measurements than current techniques. Our source code is available at: https://github.com/riponazad/echotracker/.

Cardiac valve event timing in echocardiography using deep learning and triplane recordings

Cardiac valve event timing plays a crucial role when conducting clinical measurements using echocardiography. However, established automated approaches are limited by the need of external electrocardiogram sensors, and manual measurements often rely on timing from different cardiac cycles. Recent methods have applied deep learning to cardiac timing, but they have mainly been restricted to only detecting two key time points, namely end-diastole (ED) and end-systole (ES). In this work, we propose a deep learning approach that leverages triplane recordings to enhance detection of valve events in echocardiography. Our method demonstrates improved performance detecting six different events, including valve events conventionally associated with ED and ES. Of all events, we achieve an average absolute frame difference (aFD) of maximum 1.4 frames (29 ms) for start of diastasis, down to 0.6 frames (12 ms) for mitral valve opening when performing a ten-fold cross-validation with test splits on triplane data from 240 patients. On an external independent test consisting of apical long-axis data from 180 other patients, the worst performing event detection had an aFD of 1.8 (30 ms). The proposed approach has the potential to significantly impact clinical practice by enabling more accurate, rapid and comprehensive event detection, leading to improved clinical measurements.

LU-Net: a multi-task network to improve the robustness of segmentation of left ventriclular structures by deep learning in 2D echocardiography

Segmentation of cardiac structures is one of the fundamental steps to estimate volumetric indices of the heart. This step is still performed semi-automatically in clinical routine, and is thus prone to inter- and intra-observer variability. Recent studies have shown that deep learning has the potential to perform fully automatic segmentation. However, the current best solutions still suffer from a lack of robustness. In this work, we introduce an end-to-end multi-task network designed to improve the overall accuracy of cardiac segmentation while enhancing the estimation of clinical indices and reducing the number of outliers. Results obtained on a large open access dataset show that our method outperforms the current best performing deep learning solution and achieved an overall segmentation accuracy lower than the intra-observer variability for the epicardial border (i.e. on average a mean absolute error of 1.5mm and a Hausdorff distance of 5.1mm) with 11% of outliers. Moreover, we demonstrate that our method can closely reproduce the expert analysis for the end-diastolic and end-systolic left ventricular volumes, with a mean correlation of 0.96 and a mean absolute error of 7.6ml. Concerning the ejection fraction of the left ventricle, results are more contrasted with a mean correlation coefficient of 0.83 and an absolute mean error of 5.0%, producing scores that are slightly below the intra-observer margin. Based on this observation, areas for improvement are suggested.