Can the accuracy bias by facial hairstyle be reduced through balancing the training data?

Appearance of a face can be greatly altered by growing a beard and mustache. The facial hairstyles in a pair of images can cause marked changes to the impostor distribution and the genuine distribution. Also, different distributions of facial hairstyle across demographics could cause a false impression of relative accuracy across demographics. We first show that, even though larger training sets boost the recognition accuracy on all facial hairstyles, accuracy variations caused by facial hairstyles persist regardless of the size of the training set. Then, we analyze the impact of having different fractions of the training data represent facial hairstyles. We created balanced training sets using a set of identities available in Webface42M that both have clean-shaven and facial hair images. We find that, even when a face recognition model is trained with a balanced clean-shaven / facial hair training set, accuracy variation on the test data does not diminish. Next, data augmentation is employed to further investigate the effect of facial hair distribution in training data by manipulating facial hair pixels with the help of facial landmark points and a facial hair segmentation model. Our results show facial hair causes an accuracy gap between clean-shaven and facial hair images, and this impact can be significantly different between African-Americans and Caucasians.

Beard Segmentation and Recognition Bias

A person's facial hairstyle, such as presence and size of beard, can significantly impact face recognition accuracy. There are publicly-available deep networks that achieve reasonable accuracy at binary attribute classification, such as beard / no beard, but few if any that segment the facial hair region. To investigate the effect of facial hair in a rigorous manner, we first created a set of fine-grained facial hair annotations to train a segmentation model and evaluate its accuracy across African-American and Caucasian face images. We then use our facial hair segmentations to categorize image pairs according to the degree of difference or similarity in the facial hairstyle. We find that the False Match Rate (FMR) for image pairs with different categories of facial hairstyle varies by a factor of over 10 for African-American males and over 25 for Caucasian males. To reduce the bias across image pairs with different facial hairstyles, we propose a scheme for adaptive thresholding based on facial hairstyle similarity. Evaluation on a subject-disjoint set of images shows that adaptive similarity thresholding based on facial hairstyles of the image pair reduces the ratio between the highest and lowest FMR across facial hairstyle categories for African-American from 10.7 to 1.8 and for Caucasians from 25.9 to 1.3. Facial hair annotations and facial hair segmentation model will be publicly available.