Evaluating Standard and Dialectal Frisian ASR: Multilingual Fine-tuning and Language Identification for Improved Low-resource Performance

Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) performance for low-resource languages is still far behind that of higher-resource languages such as English, due to a lack of sufficient labeled data. State-of-the-art methods deploy self-supervised transfer learning where a model pre-trained on large amounts of data is fine-tuned using little labeled data in a target low-resource language. In this paper, we present and examine a method for fine-tuning an SSL-based model in order to improve the performance for Frisian and its regional dialects (Clay Frisian, Wood Frisian, and South Frisian). We show that Frisian ASR performance can be improved by using multilingual (Frisian, Dutch, English and German) fine-tuning data and an auxiliary language identification task. In addition, our findings show that performance on dialectal speech suffers substantially, and, importantly, that this effect is moderated by the elicitation approach used to collect the dialectal data. Our findings also particularly suggest that relying solely on standard language data for ASR evaluation may underestimate real-world performance, particularly in languages with substantial dialectal variation.

Strategies in Transfer Learning for Low-Resource Speech Synthesis: Phone Mapping, Features Input, and Source Language Selection

We compare using a PHOIBLE-based phone mapping method and using phonological features input in transfer learning for TTS in low-resource languages. We use diverse source languages (English, Finnish, Hindi, Japanese, and Russian) and target languages (Bulgarian, Georgian, Kazakh, Swahili, Urdu, and Uzbek) to test the language-independence of the methods and enhance the findings' applicability. We use Character Error Rates from automatic speech recognition and predicted Mean Opinion Scores for evaluation. Results show that both phone mapping and features input improve the output quality and the latter performs better, but these effects also depend on the specific language combination. We also compare the recently-proposed Angular Similarity of Phone Frequencies (ASPF) with a family tree-based distance measure as a criterion to select source languages in transfer learning. ASPF proves effective if label-based phone input is used, while the language distance does not have expected effects.

The Effects of Input Type and Pronunciation Dictionary Usage in Transfer Learning for Low-Resource Text-to-Speech

We compare phone labels and articulatory features as input for cross-lingual transfer learning in text-to-speech (TTS) for low-resource languages (LRLs). Experiments with FastSpeech 2 and the LRL West Frisian show that using articulatory features outperformed using phone labels in both intelligibility and naturalness. For LRLs without pronunciation dictionaries, we propose two novel approaches: a) using a massively multilingual model to convert grapheme-to-phone (G2P) in both training and synthesizing, and b) using a universal phone recognizer to create a makeshift dictionary. Results show that the G2P approach performs largely on par with using a ground-truth dictionary and the phone recognition approach, while performing generally worse, remains a viable option for LRLs less suitable for the G2P approach. Within each approach, using articulatory features as input outperforms using phone labels.

Resource-Efficient Fine-Tuning Strategies for Automatic MOS Prediction in Text-to-Speech for Low-Resource Languages

We train a MOS prediction model based on wav2vec 2.0 using the open-access data sets BVCC and SOMOS. Our test with neural TTS data in the low-resource language (LRL) West Frisian shows that pre-training on BVCC before fine-tuning on SOMOS leads to the best accuracy for both fine-tuned and zero-shot prediction. Further fine-tuning experiments show that using more than 30 percent of the total data does not lead to significant improvements. In addition, fine-tuning with data from a single listener shows promising system-level accuracy, supporting the viability of one-participant pilot tests. These findings can all assist the resource-conscious development of TTS for LRLs by progressing towards better zero-shot MOS prediction and informing the design of listening tests, especially in early-stage evaluation.