Abstract:We compare using a PHOIBLE-based phone mapping method and using phonological features input in transfer learning for TTS in low-resource languages. We use diverse source languages (English, Finnish, Hindi, Japanese, and Russian) and target languages (Bulgarian, Georgian, Kazakh, Swahili, Urdu, and Uzbek) to test the language-independence of the methods and enhance the findings' applicability. We use Character Error Rates from automatic speech recognition and predicted Mean Opinion Scores for evaluation. Results show that both phone mapping and features input improve the output quality and the latter performs better, but these effects also depend on the specific language combination. We also compare the recently-proposed Angular Similarity of Phone Frequencies (ASPF) with a family tree-based distance measure as a criterion to select source languages in transfer learning. ASPF proves effective if label-based phone input is used, while the language distance does not have expected effects.
Abstract:We compare phone labels and articulatory features as input for cross-lingual transfer learning in text-to-speech (TTS) for low-resource languages (LRLs). Experiments with FastSpeech 2 and the LRL West Frisian show that using articulatory features outperformed using phone labels in both intelligibility and naturalness. For LRLs without pronunciation dictionaries, we propose two novel approaches: a) using a massively multilingual model to convert grapheme-to-phone (G2P) in both training and synthesizing, and b) using a universal phone recognizer to create a makeshift dictionary. Results show that the G2P approach performs largely on par with using a ground-truth dictionary and the phone recognition approach, while performing generally worse, remains a viable option for LRLs less suitable for the G2P approach. Within each approach, using articulatory features as input outperforms using phone labels.
Abstract:We train a MOS prediction model based on wav2vec 2.0 using the open-access data sets BVCC and SOMOS. Our test with neural TTS data in the low-resource language (LRL) West Frisian shows that pre-training on BVCC before fine-tuning on SOMOS leads to the best accuracy for both fine-tuned and zero-shot prediction. Further fine-tuning experiments show that using more than 30 percent of the total data does not lead to significant improvements. In addition, fine-tuning with data from a single listener shows promising system-level accuracy, supporting the viability of one-participant pilot tests. These findings can all assist the resource-conscious development of TTS for LRLs by progressing towards better zero-shot MOS prediction and informing the design of listening tests, especially in early-stage evaluation.