Can recurrent neural networks learn process model structure?

Various methods using machine and deep learning have been proposed to tackle different tasks in predictive process monitoring, forecasting for an ongoing case e.g. the most likely next event or suffix, its remaining time, or an outcome-related variable. Recurrent neural networks (RNNs), and more specifically long short-term memory nets (LSTMs), stand out in terms of popularity. In this work, we investigate the capabilities of such an LSTM to actually learn the underlying process model structure of an event log. We introduce an evaluation framework that combines variant-based resampling and custom metrics for fitness, precision and generalization. We evaluate 4 hypotheses concerning the learning capabilities of LSTMs, the effect of overfitting countermeasures, the level of incompleteness in the training set and the level of parallelism in the underlying process model. We confirm that LSTMs can struggle to learn process model structure, even with simplistic process data and in a very lenient setup. Taking the correct anti-overfitting measures can alleviate the problem. However, these measures did not present themselves to be optimal when selecting hyperparameters purely on predicting accuracy. We also found that decreasing the amount of information seen by the LSTM during training, causes a sharp drop in generalization and precision scores. In our experiments, we could not identify a relationship between the extent of parallelism in the model and the generalization capability, but they do indicate that the process' complexity might have impact.

Enhancing Stochastic Petri Net-based Remaining Time Prediction using k-Nearest Neighbors

Reliable remaining time prediction of ongoing business processes is a highly relevant topic. One example is order delivery, a key competitive factor in e.g. retailing as it is a main driver of customer satisfaction. For realising timely delivery, an accurate prediction of the remaining time of the delivery process is crucial. Within the field of process mining, a wide variety of remaining time prediction techniques have already been proposed. In this work, we extend remaining time prediction based on stochastic Petri nets with generally distributed transitions with k-nearest neighbors. The k-nearest neighbors algorithm is performed on simple vectors storing the time passed to complete previous activities. By only taking a subset of instances, a more representative and stable stochastic Petri Net is obtained, leading to more accurate time predictions. We discuss the technique and its basic implementation in Python and use different real world data sets to evaluate the predictive power of our extension. These experiments show clear advantages in combining both techniques with regard to predictive power.

Can deep neural networks learn process model structure? An assessment framework and analysis

Predictive process monitoring concerns itself with the prediction of ongoing cases in (business) processes. Prediction tasks typically focus on remaining time, outcome, next event or full case suffix prediction. Various methods using machine and deep learning havebeen proposed for these tasks in recent years. Especially recurrent neural networks (RNNs) such as long short-term memory nets (LSTMs) have gained in popularity. However, no research focuses on whether such neural network-based models can truly learn the structure of underlying process models. For instance, can such neural networks effectively learn parallel behaviour or loops? Therefore, in this work, we propose an evaluation scheme complemented with new fitness, precision, and generalisation metrics, specifically tailored towards measuring the capacity of deep learning models to learn process model structure. We apply this framework to several process models with simple control-flow behaviour, on the task of next-event prediction. Our results show that, even for such simplistic models, careful tuning of overfitting countermeasures is required to allow these models to learn process model structure.